• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Michigan’s Unusually Strict Ban On Voter Transportation

Michigan’s Unusually Strict Ban On Voter Transportation

May 26, 2021 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Michigan’s Unusually Strict Ban On Voter TransportationMichigan has voted to ban ubering to polls. This adds to the slew of voter suppression measures across the country. This information is from Democracy Docket. Here is an excerpt:

Voter suppression laws are not unique to 2021. For decades, Republican state legislatures have written, passed and defended disenfranchising laws for every step of the voting process. In Michigan, a challenge to the state’s voter transportation ban—originally brought in 2019 —is still being litigated. Here’s what you need to know about Priorities USA v. Nessel.

How did we get here?

A full year ahead of the 2020 election, progressive advocacy organization Priorities USA sued Michigan over two specific election laws: the voter transportation ban and the absentee ballot organizing ban. Both of these restrictions create unnecessary hurdles for eligible voters to cast their ballots, and particularly affect people without access to private transportation. In January, 2020, student group Rise, Inc. and labor group A. Philip Randolph Institute joined the lawsuit.

Michigan’s voter transportation ban prohibits anyone from hiring transportation for bringing voters to the polls unless the voters are physically unable to walk. The possible penalty for helping someone get a ride to the polls is a $500 fine and up to 90 days in prison.This ban severely hinders get-out-the-vote campaigns that often include initiatives that focus on giving rides to disabled voters, Black church communities, and other groups who do not have easy access to transportation. This ban is unique to Michigan. For example, in 2018 Uber and Lyft provided promotions to help voters in every other state to get to the polls, but Michiganders could not take part.

Read the full article here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: American State Elections, Voter Access, Voter Suppression

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “‘We’re going to beat you to death with audits’: Brad Raffensperger gears up to oversee his final election in Georgia”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • Roger Marshall’s complicated history of blurring the line between taxpayer dollars and campaign cash”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 hours ago
  • “Who Won the Redistricting War?”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 hours ago
  • “Unaggrandizing the Partisan Gerrymander”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 hours ago
  • “Trump Has Cast Doubt on Elections on 440 Days in His Second Term”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago