• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / Democracy in America / How a Jim Crow Law Stacks the Deck Against Mississippi Democrats

How a Jim Crow Law Stacks the Deck Against Mississippi Democrats

February 7, 2019 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Stacks the Deck Against Mississippi DemocratsFrom Jeff Singer at Daily Kos:

Democratic Attorney General Jim Hood is running for governor of Mississippi this year, and as we’ve noted before, a Jim Crow-era law means that Hood could lose even if he wins the most votes on Election Day.​ That’s because the state’s 1890 constitution requires gubernatorial candidates to win both a majority of the statewide vote and a majority of the 122 districts that make up the state House.

How a Jim Crow Law Stacks the Deck Against Mississippi Democrats
Attorney General Jim Hood – Image source

If no candidate wins both the popular vote and a majority of districts, the state House, where Republicans hold a wide 74-48 majority, then picks a winner from the top two finishers. Given the GOP’s shamelessness in embracing undemocratic outcomes, it’s unlikely they’d choose Hood, even if he wins the most votes. And thanks to Mississippi’s gerrymandered map, which the GOP drew up in 2012, we know it’ll be difficult for Hood to carry 62 House seats. But just how difficult?

To answer that, we can look to the results of Mississippi’s 2015 statewide contests broken down by state House district, which the state has calculated. Because of serious insufficiencies in the data available from the state, Daily Kos Elections has not yet calculated the results of the 2016 presidential race by legislative district, and the state has not published results for the 2015 contests by state Senate district.

Thanks to Mississippi's 1890 Jim Crow constitution, Jim Hood (D) may need to win the popular vote for governor by >10% this fall to avoid having the gerrymandered GOP state House seat his opponent instead. This law's origin was racist & it should be challenged as unconstitutional https://t.co/dvMpsRwzNl

— Stephen Wolf @stephenwolf.bsky.social (@PoliticsWolf) February 4, 2019

Read that full report at Daily Kos. A great overview of the history of Jim Crow laws is provided by who note that, “Jim Crow was a derisive slang term for a black man. It came to mean any state law passed in the South that established different rules for blacks and whites.” That article also notes some of the specific Jim Crow laws that were the law of the land for decades in many states:

By 1914, Texas had six entire towns in which blacks could not live. Mobile passed a Jim Crow curfew: Blacks could not leave their homes after 10 p.m. Signs marked “Whites Only” or “Colored” hung over doors, ticket windows, and drinking fountains. Georgia had black and white parks. Oklahoma had black and white phone booths. Prisons, hospitals, and orphanages were segregated as were schools and colleges. In North Carolina, black and white students had to use separate sets of textbooks. In Florida, the books couldn’t even be stored together.

What do you think about the Mississippi law in question? Add you comment below…

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: African-Americans and Democracy, American State Elections, Election History, Racism and Prejudice

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “Jan. 6 Rioters Are the New Hot Event in Town...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Clarence Thomas has long tried to undercut t...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Leader of pro-Eric Adams super PAC banking o...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Musk says he wants a new political party, an...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Lawsuit on Alleged “Irregularities” in Rockla...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago