• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / American Democracy Originals / North Dakota Voter ID Law to Harm Native American Voters

North Dakota Voter ID Law to Harm Native American Voters

October 11, 2018 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Supreme Court Rejects North Dakota’s New ID Law
North Dakota – Image link

As part of the last minute court election law rulings that are taking place, the U.S Supreme Court recently refused to intervene in a case related to the contentious North Dakota voter ID laws. Their decision has put the votes of tens of thousands of Native Americans and other locals in jeopardy.

On October 9th the Supreme Court refused to intervene in a challenge order that was presented in April by the Federal District Court of North Dakota. The North Dakota voter ID law in question permits the state to allow voters to cast their ballot only if they are able to show ID’s that have current street address or mailing address. The order was by followed the June primaries but the Appeal Courts for the 8th Circuit put the order on hold in September.

Last week the issue as taken to the Supreme Court. The Justices refused to step in and take action. The results of the North Dakota law being upheld at this late date will be in preventing thousands of Native Americans voters from casting their ballot in the coming November elections. Local activists are furious. Their lawyers argued in court that adding the new ID requirements “so close to the election—after voting has actually started—will irreparably injure Native American voters and cause serious voter confusion.”

At stake in this decision are the actual election results in a closely fought election year. Democrats are hoping to win a key Senate race between where Republican Kevin Cramer is trying to unseat Democrat Heidi Heitkamp. It is widely believed the voter ID law would harm Democratic voters more than Republican who are more likely to already have ID. Native American voters in particular have expressed their worries that the presentation of identification bearing street address as demanded by the new law will pose an obstacle to them in several ways.

This is due to the fact that most Native Americans live in rural areas where addresses are often not available and are therefore not frequently found on tribal ID. Native Americans in that area also suffer from an extreme epidemic of homeless. Two Supreme Court Justices who voted against the majority decision, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan, were pointed in their dissent, as pointed out in a post on Supreme Court journalism outfit Scotus Blog:

Ginsburg complained that the “risk of voter confusion appears severe here because the injunction against requiring residential-address identification was in force during the primary election and because the Secretary of State’s website announced for months the identification requirements as they existed under that injunction.” Ginsburg acknowledged that, as the 8th Circuit had emphasized, the elections are still a month away.

However, Ginsburg stressed, tens of thousands of North Dakotans don’t have an ID bearing their residential street address. As a result, she warned, the 8th Circuit’s order “may lead to voters finding out at the polling place that they cannot vote because their formerly valid ID is now insufficient.”

As the midterm elections draw near, many states are quickly trying to ready their election administrations. North Dakota has proven its priorities in this regard for 2018. They passed a law and fought for it that will stop homeless Native Americans from voting due to lack of proof of residency. The whole episode is a tragedy.

North Dakota Voter ID Law

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: American Democracy Originals, Democracy in America Tagged With: American State Elections, Minority Voting Rights, Native American Voting Rights, New York City and State Elections, Supreme Court, Voter Access, Voter ID

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 5 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 months ago