The Judgement Stand: Stereotyping Poverty

“A critique does not consist in saying that things aren’t good the way they are.
It consists in seeing on just what type of assumptions, of familiar notions,
of established and unexamined ways of thinking the accepted practices are based.”

-Michel Foucault

by Aydasara Ortega

In social psychology, a stereotype is a thought that can be adopted about specific types of individuals or certain ways of doing things. These thoughts and beliefs, this perception, may or may not accurately reflect reality. That is, stereotypes could be a result of incomplete or distorted information accepted as fact without question.  Due to the process of over-generalization within social perception, stereotyping leads to a great deal of inaccuracy in perception.

Let’s take the example of stereotyping poverty of individuals that receive food stamps: lazy, vicious, with low morals, without dignity and work ethic. That they are in a big way responsible of the economic crisis; as, for example, the “middle class” believes that they work for the “low class”. That the contributions they pay go towards feeding the receivers of food stamps.

Yet, rigorous sociological and economic studies indicate that these stereotypes and conclusions lend themselves to a superficial perception of the issue. Everything is perception but some are more informed than others. These studies show that the welfare system was not invented by the poor. It is meant to be a response to the state of poverty produced by the financial crisis characteristic of capitalist economies. 

The workforce reduction in an economic crisis automatically and inevitably produces a level of unemployment that is not accidental but necessary to keep the system running. It is the one that permits to keep the workforce cheap. This reveals itself as strategy of the state and a systematic one.

There are two situations that the state has to control in times of economic crisis:

1. the possible revolts that could come out of a shortage situation, out of the desperation of these people. The state needs to be in charge of this.
2. that if money doesn’t circulate somehow and this population stops consuming, it also affects the economy, the commercial interest of corporations. There would be a population that is not consuming

Therefore, the food stamps money returns to the ark of those who have money: the commerce. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is a way of keeping the economy working; working for some, at least.

This is the focus based on the theories of Keynesian economics. The concept of welfare where the state supplies to the sector that stays marginalized by the same economy. This strategy is to conjure the effects of capitalistic over-exploitation alleviating a situation produced not by the “low class” but by the same nature of the economic system that has been adopted.

Stereotyping Poverty and Wealth

There are different ways of perceiving this issue, but the data and the facts are there. There is a big breach between the poor and the rich. This is an empirical reality, perceived by all.

Given that it’s not the poor that have control of the media, but the ones that exercise power, they have control of how we represent reality to ourselves. And the result is that we see the ones in power as successful, capable, divinely determined to be there … A mediated fascination that all sectors (“high class”, “middle class” and “low class”) aspire to.

The outcome? When reality bites us during economic difficulties and we want to put one culprit on the judgment stand, it’s easier to use the “low class” as the scapegoat and perceive them as the ones responsible for this reality. Here is when prejudices happen; something that has historically led to discrimination, persecutions… and exterminium.