• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Trump’s Proposals Won’t Fix the Affordable Care Act

by Joan Krickellas - January 27, 2017

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin
Fix the Affordable Care Act
https://www.flickr.com/photos/taedc/19150066405

President Trump threatened during his campaign that there would be “full repeal of Obamacare” on “day one of the Trump Administration.”  But, rather than an across-the-board dismantling of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), President Trump should consider preserving some of its foundational components, and build upon those instead.  The ACA, if improved upon, has the potential to reduce healthcare disparities among Americans by broadening access to high-quality care and expanded insurance coverage.

President Trump’s healthcare reform agenda involves the systematic deconstruction of the ACA.  His first step will be the elimination of the individual mandate.  He deems that “no person should be required to buy [health] insurance unless he or she wants to.” I firmly disagree with him; I think everyone should have healthcare coverage, regardless of whether they want it or not.  Medical care is a basic human need, and healthcare should be mandatorily appropriated to every individual.

Affordable Care ActHow each individual’s healthcare coverage is paid for is the real focus of this problem.  I think those who can afford coverage should be required to purchase it.  If they decide not to–because they think they won’t get sick or that “the state” (ie, taxpayers) would take care of their medical expenses if they did—they should be subject to the economic penalties currently imposed by the ACA. The ACA, however, also penalizes the working poor whose income is marginally above the Medicaid cut-off threshold, and who cannot afford healthcare. So there really should be some tax law changes that ease the financial burden put on lower-income individuals.

While President Trump wants to prevent people from being financially penalized for making what he believes should be a choice, he risks the possibility that millions of Americans would live without healthcare coverage.  He does not, with this thinking, give consideration to what the devastating personal financial implications would be for such an individual should he/she develop a catastrophic illness.

Also, without mandatory health insurance, it is possible, or even likely, that fewer people would spend money to undergo preventive health measures, such as screening tests like the mammogram, the PAP test, or the screening colonoscopy. It is known that disease detection in its early stage costs less to treat. If voluntary healthcare deniers present with advanced disease that could have been found earlier on, it would place an avoidable heavy financial burden on the healthcare system–not to mention, and perhaps even more importantly, it would worsen the prognosis of the individual, and there would be a lesser likelihood of cure.

Thus, instead of a focus on optional healthcare policies, President Trump should set multiple parameters to individualize a person’s or family’s financial ability to contribute to their healthcare insurance premiums.  It could be modeled after the process of how families apply for college financial aid.  If people believe that their healthcare contribution would be determined after all other important financial obligations were carefully considered, I expect they would less reluctant to submit to mandatory healthcare coverage, and would see that it would be in their best interest to be financially protected should they get sick.

I also disagree with his proposal to allow for the sale of health insurance across state lines.  Can anything be more confusing than that?

While President Trump states this would further expand the scope of competition amongst health insurance companies that could drive down insurance premiums, it could only further ridiculously confuse how doctors and hospitals would put in claims for payment.  It could definitely risk denial or compromise of payments from state to state given the differential in the cost of healthcare amongst the states.  It could even conceivably lead to the denial of certain tests or treatments in more “expensive” states than in less expensive states.

If Congress were to pass a law enabling New Yorkers to buy healthcare coverage from Montana, would that mean these people would be somehow penalized by the private health insurance company for “electing” to receive their care in New York?

In addition, the number of “options” an individual would have to sift through—and understand—would be daunting.  It takes to search out and differentiate the healthcare coverage choices, and if you are ill, you may not have this time.

Finally, this proposal does not inform of a clear ACA replacement plan. That’s because there is no clear plan, and this is extremely problematic, especially since he stated in mid-January that the ACA would be repealed by the end of the month.  Under such time constraints, it was difficult for Congress to craft a comprehensive, effective reform bill.  This may be why the plan announced recently, on January 23rd, by four Republican senators appears confusing and questionable. The plan allows for individual states decide whether or not they’d keep the ACA in place. But, wouldn’t such a plan lead to disunity among the states?

And wouldn’t that actually not be considered a full repeal, but more like a weak compromise that would upset both the Republicans, who want to entirely rid of the ACA, and the Democrats, who conversely want it in its entirety?

As I finish writing this, I realize that there is one thing though that is crystal clear to me—that the future of healthcare currently looks like a murky mess under the Trump administration.

 

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Republicans

About Joan Krickellas

Joan Krickellas is a student at Vassar College majoring in environmental studies, with particular emphasis in biology and women’s studies. Social issues she finds to be of particular interest include those that pertain to human rights, migration/immigration, discrimination, and climate change. She firmly believes that everyone should have the right to voice their opinions. Democracy Chronicles is where she feels comfortable in voicing her own.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Trump’s Proposals Won’t Fix the Affordable Care Act

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy