• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Against Arizona’s Proposition 121, a Flawed “Top-Two” Primary

by Richard Fobes - October 16, 2012

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Richard Fobes Arizona's Proposition 121 Top-Two Primary

Election Method Expert Richard Fobes Urges No Vote on Arizona Top-Two Primary

by Richard Fobes

Arizona’s ballot contains Proposition 121, which would create what its supporters claim is a top-two primary election.  The idea is to allow all the voters to vote in the primary election for all the candidates, including both Republican and Democratic candidates.  Then the two most popular candidates would move on to compete in the general election. That’s the intent, but alas, the details of what’s proposed would not work the way it’s intended.

Two candidates Top-Two election voters
Two candidates from the same party could easily win such a “Top-Two” election, even if the voters are balanced

This top-two primary election idea is emotionally appealing because it seems to convey the message “we don’t like how primary elections are done now.”  Unfortunately the top-two primary approach is like rolling loaded dice.  The top two approach favors whichever party offers fewer candidates. The Wikipedia article titled Vote Splitting explains this concept.

For a specific scenario of vote-splitting in a top-two primary, suppose that 55 percent of the voters prefer Republican candidates and the other 45 percent prefer Democratic candidates.  If the ballot lists four Republican candidates and just two Democratic candidates, both of the Democratic candidates will win both spots in the primary election. This occurs even though intuitively everyone would expect that the two winners should be one Republican candidate and one Democratic candidate, or possibly two Republican candidates.  This kind of outcome is wildly unfair, yet very likely for this scenario.

Those of us who do the math for election methods know that the candidate with the most votes is not necessarily the most popular. (As a related point, the candidate with the fewest votes is not necessarily the least popular.)

The top-two primary approach is based on the mistaken belief that the candidate with the most votes is the most popular, and that the candidate with the second-most votes is second-most popular.  Anyone who bothers doing the math can verify that this belief is wildly mistaken.  While it is possible to have a top-two primary in a way that produces fair results, Arizona’s Proposition 121—although it is called a top-two primary—is not really a top-two primary.

Arizona’s Proposition 121 and Single-Mark Ballots

The problem with existing primary elections is that they use single-mark ballots.  These ballots only allow a voter to mark a single candidate.  Unfortunately the top-two approach in Arizona’s Proposition 121 uses the same kind of flawed ballot.

Arizona's Proposition 121 Top-Two Primary
A push for a similarly flawed “Top-Two” Primary in Oregon was defeated

The only way to get fairer results is to allow voters to mark more than one choice.  In my opinion the best way to do so is to use 1-2-3 ballots and pairwise counting.  Some voting method experts prefer the simplicity of something called approval voting, which uses ballots that look like single-mark ballots, but which allow a voter to mark more than one choice.  Regardless of the choice, the point is that better ballots are needed.

As the author of a how-to book on creative problem-solving, I certainly like innovation.  Yet having a degree in physics, which includes studying mathematics, I know how to do the math behind voting.  Here in Oregon we had a proposition for top-two primary similar to Arizona’s Proposition 121, and we defeated it.  After that defeat I talked to a major supporter of the proposition, and he lacked the knowledge about the flawed math that underlies this flawed idea.

Anyone in Arizona who wants fairer election results should vote against Arizona’s Proposition 121, learn about vote-splitting, and look at the Declaration of Election-Method Reform Advocates at www.BanSingleMarkBallots.org to see which election-method reforms are supported by election-method experts who analyze the math behind different voting methods.

 

 

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American State Elections, Election Methods, Independent Politicians, Third Party

About Richard Fobes

Richard Fobes is a longtime DC writer and helped us immensely from the start. He is the author of "Creative Problem Solver's Toolbox: A Complete Course in the Art of Creating Solutions to Problems of Any Kind" and "Ending The Hidden Unfairness In U.S. Elections".

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Frank Henry says

    October 19, 2012 at 1:11 am

    A YES vote for Prop 121 is supported by a move to support voter’s “Full
    Voting Rights”.

    Voting methods that recognize “the most votes” wins is one of the aspects
    of “Full Voting Rights”. 121 supports this methode.

    Also a YES vote for 121 will:

    1. Allow all voters equal access to be placed on every balolots.

    2. Allow all voters equal access to vote on every ballots.

    3. Allows all political parties to work hard in supporting the questions
    and candidates, without the use of taxpayers tax monies.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Against Arizona’s Proposition 121, a Flawed “Top-Two” Primary

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy