• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / The Republican’s American Health Care Act Explained

The Republican’s American Health Care Act Explained

June 5, 2017 by Hassan Elhage Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
American Health Care Act Explained
link

Earlier this month, the American Health Care Act (AHCA) passed in the House of Representatives, moving it forward to the Senate.

If passed, the changes it brings would result in less people insured, impacting the accessibility to proper care and the ability of physicians to provide services. The law would also lower subsidies for those purchasing insurance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges, reduce Medicaid coverage, and higher premiums for older individuals. Ultimately, the expansion of Medicaid to those at the poverty level will be halted and millions of low-income individuals will lose coverage.

The AHCA also influences local policy, allowing states to excuse insurance companies from covering services, which forces more payments to come directly from patients. Those with preexisting health conditions are most disadvantaged, as coverage can more easily be denied.

American Health Care Act Explained
link

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has started the process of dismantling the policies in the Affordable Care Act by trimming and slowing down mandatory payments.

Unlike the Affordable Care Act, the AHCA seeks to reduce the federal government’s involvement in providing healthcare. In fact, the AHCA plans to cut federal spending by $1.15 trillion through limitations on expenditures and subsidies.

The main theoretical framework of the AHCA relies on the concept of personal responsibility for healthcare. Essentially, it is the belief that when a patient oversees their own bills, they will avoid unnecessary services, thus, decreasing inflation in healthcare. To assist patients in their responsibility to pay out-of-pocket for healthcare, the bill establishes tax-free health savings accounts (HSAs), which patients fund themselves to pay for services. Those with low incomes, however, will not have the means to support these accounts.

Yet despite the AHCA’s goal to remove federal regulations, it also forces people who did not have insurance for at least 63 days but then sought coverage to pay a premium that is 30% higher than normal—which is a stricter penalty than the tax penalty under the Affordable Care Act. Such a penalty serves as a disincentive for enrollment.

Another key distinction between the AHCA and the ACA involves their approach in covering the unhealthy. The AHCA disadvantages the less healthy by shielding healthier patients from contributing to the costs of unhealthy patients, while the ACA collectivized every patient in the system to give one standard regardless of health status. Likewise, those who seek access to special services, such as maternity benefits or mental health coverage, would be the only ones responsible for paying for such services.

Those with preexisting conditions are also discouraged under the AHCA from accessing normal insurance plans. Not only will healthcare costs rise substantially for these patients, they can be denied insurance altogether.

Meanwhile, the bill disadvantages the old as well, allowing insurers to charge older adults five times more than younger adults—which is an increase from the three times more that is currently in place by the ACA.

Ultimately, physicians and other healthcare providers will endure providing more uncompensated care. CBO analysis of the bill predicts that the number of uninsured will nearly double, increasing the percentage from 10% to 19% of Americans.

It is important to note that while the AHCA allows federal savings by removing healthcare expenses, it eliminates hundreds of billions of tax money provided by drug companies, device-makers, and high-income Americans. The net deficit of the bill, thus, would be only $150 billion, as $1 trillion in revenues is lost to tax cuts.

In terms of support from mainstream medical groups, the AHCA is left without backing. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Physicians, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American Medical Association have all released statements of disapproval, mainly due to the immense loss of coverage for millions of Americans.

Ultimately, the American Health Care Act does not partake in measures to resolve the main criticisms the medical community have, which deal with the intrusiveness of current policy from allowing practices to provide care. Yet the AHCA does manage to strip healthcare access from the most vulnerable populations who need it most—individuals with preexisting conditions, the mentally ill, the old, the sick and the poor. And unfortunately, any federal savings from cutting off care are made practically obsolete—transferring billions of dollars in tax cuts to the rich.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Disability and Democracy, Republicans

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Hassan Elhage

Hassan Elhage is an undergraduate student at New York University with a strong interest in human rights, political ideology, and American and international politics. He currently writes for the Democracy Chronicles from New York City. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well!

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Lloyd Mayer on the Johnson Amendment
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 23 hours ago
  • VoteBeat on Texas Redistricting
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago
  • Preliminary Injunction Against Maine Foreign...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago
  • Expand Democracy Roundup
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago
  • Brennan Center Releases Local Election Offici...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago