• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Battle over the Thomas Hofeller gerrymandering files

Battle over the Thomas Hofeller gerrymandering files

September 8, 2019 by DC Editors 1 Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Battle over the Thomas Hofeller gerrymandering filesThe Thomas B. Hofeller gerrymandering files have led to some legal battles raging, with Republicans doing all to have them thrown out of court. Michael Wines has written an interesting new article in the New York Times about the battles around the Thomas B. Hofeller gerrymandering files. Used as evidence to sue for Republican gerrymandering, the Republicans are doing everything to have the files thrown out from court. According to Wines,

At the heart of a decisive court ruling on Tuesday striking down North Carolina’s state legislative maps was evidence culled from the computer backups of the man who drew them: Thomas B. Hofeller, the Republican strategist and master of gerrymandering, who died last year.

Documents from the backups, which surfaced after his death, were also central to the legal battle over adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census. An enormous stash of digital files, covering Mr. Hofeller’s work in almost every state, has yet to be examined.

But in a state court in Raleigh, N.C., another courtroom battle is underway. Its aim is to ensure that those files are never publicly scrutinized.

Republican political figures filed a flurry of motions on Friday in the same court that issued the gerrymandering decision, all seeking to seal or destroy the 75,000-plus files that contain more than 100,000 documents and thousands of maps. Among them were a South Carolina lawyer, Dalton L. Oldham, who was a partner with Mr. Hofeller in a consultancy, Geographic Strategies L.L.C., that advised the Republican Party and party leaders nationwide on redistricting.

See full story here

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Redistricting, Republicans

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Deborah S Alexander says

    September 16, 2019 at 10:34 am

    The NY Times’ link – and your [apparently never scrutinized] link to the
    ” flurry of motions [filed] on Friday” links not to the subset of Motions filed on a Friday in September – but to the entire prior Gerrymandering Trial.

    FInding the new Motion and scheduled hearing for the Hofeller matter has been a lengthy and frustrating excercise – leading so far – to nothing relating to the Motion Brief mentioned, nor to the “scheduling” order for opposing briefs – nor to anything that I could locate.

    PLEASE ASSIST READERS WITH A MORE SELECTIVE LINK – perhaps consider linking to a PDF copy of the Motion FIling?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago