• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Let’s Play: “What’s The Best Voting Method?”

Let’s Play: “What’s The Best Voting Method?”

April 22, 2014 by George Sanders 2 Comments

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Direct Democracy Best Voting Method

After seeing Democracy Chronicles’ excellent kickstarter trailer for Design of a Broken System, and hearing John Amaruso’s smart ‘plea’ for electoral reform as the #1 overarching issue that will engender all the other major issues we face, I couldn’t help but come up with the following simple example (below) to provoke a thoughtful discussion on voting-method reform.

Thanks …and good luck with the documentary!

——————————————————

Let’s play: “What’s the best voting method?”

Instructions: Please answer the simple Question #1 before tackling the difficult Question #2

Question #1:
Three friends want to select one of thirty nearby restaurants that will most likely provide them with the greatest overall satisfaction as a group. What voting method should they use?

Question #2:
Three-hundred million people want to select one of thirty candidates who will most likely provide them with the greatest overall satisfaction as a collective group (the very essence of “democracy”). What voting method should they use?

Conundrum?:
If your answer to Question #2 is different from your answer to Question #1, please explain at what point (the precise # of voters in the electorate) that you changed your voting method, and changed it to what method, and WHY?

What is the Best Voting Method to You?

ANSWER BELOW…

 

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election Methods

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About George Sanders

George Sanders writes for Democracy Chronicles from New York. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Adrian Tawfik says

    April 22, 2014 at 3:51 pm

    Question 1: I think with three people, consensus is the best option and no one should be totally against the decision.

    Question 2: I really am not an expert here but from what I have learned in last few years, there are supporters of different methods all of whom are convinced they are correct. Clearly the quest for “the best voting method” continues. Its seems most of these people agree that plurality is the worst system though.

    Conundrum: Small groups have a better chance at pleasing everyone but not 100% of the time. Often even a married couple can’t pick a good place to eat easily. They can be politically different people and sometimes it would be impossible to come to a consensus agreement. But with large groups and nations where thousands must decide, there will have to be people who disagree with the final decision, especially in controversial topics. Yet clearly a vote is the best way to make a decision in big groups, giving everyone an equal say and making sure that by representing everyone’s view, there is less likely to be decisions made that harm everyone. This is a big plus when compared to non-democracies where a few people can make decisions for thousands – even leading a nation to war without any support from the public.

    Reply
  2. Richard Fobes says

    April 27, 2014 at 3:27 pm

    The words “Three-hundred million people want to select one of thirty candidates” are unclear. If there is no election linkage between the 30 representatives — which is what the question seems to imply — then there is no way to conduct fair elections.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “Supreme Court Orders Maine House to Restore...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • EU decision on Israel must turn into action,...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 12 hours ago
  • “The Arizona Fellows Model: Developing the Ne...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 16 hours ago
  • “Musk to step back from political spending: ‘...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 17 hours ago
  • Sudanese photojournalist Al-Shykh Al-Samany S...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 18 hours ago