• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | ALL NEWS | WORLD | Bilash terms of release demonstrate Kazakhstan’s Contempt for Rights

Bilash terms of release demonstrate Kazakhstan’s Contempt for Rights

August 23, 2019 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Bilash terms of release demonstrate Kazakhstan’s Contempt for Rights

Kazakhstan gained independence when the Soviet Union collapsed. It however remained a repressive dictatorship and its first leadership alternation, albeit organised in an undemocratic fashion, took place only in mid-2019. The new authorities have however pursued repression of basic civil and political rights.

The most recent victim of this system is Serikzhan Bilash, an activist who was been very vocal about China’s crimes against Turkic muslim minorities. Detained earlier this year on the demeaning charge of “sowing discord”, Bilash has been freed following a hearing on August 16.

However, the terms of his release are unambiguously meant to silence the activist. In an article in Human Rights Watch (HRW), Hugh Williamson argues that the terms of release of Bilash are a demonstration of Kazakhstan’s contempt of rights. According to Williamson,

When Serikzhan Bilash, a well-known rights activist in Kazakhstan, was freed from jail after a hearing late on August 16, 2019, he was very clear about the terms of his release: Cease all activism against China.

“It was that or seven years in jail. I had no choice,” said Bilash, who has exposed human rights violations against Turkic Muslim minorities, including ethnic Kazakhs in China’s Xinjiang region.

The harsh terms imposed by the Almaty court show how willing Kazakhstan is to repress the rights of courageous activists like Bilash. Under the conditions of his release he had to concede guilt to bogus incitement charges, give up peaceful activism, pay a $300 fine, and cannot leave Almaty, Kazakhstan’s largest city, for three months.

See full story here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: International Democracy Tagged With: Asia, Central Asia, China, Dictatorships

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ, CIVICUS urge Indonesian president to stop undermining press freedom ahead of 2-year mark in office
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 hours ago
  • DOJ’s Threat Letter to California Voting Officials with a 48-Hour Deadline is Amateurish Political Theater Aimed at Sowing Chaos, Not to Mention a Demand That Likely Violates Federal Law and Election Security Practices
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • October 16 Cato Webinar: “Could the White House Pull the Plug on Voting Machines?”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago
  • Hasan Minhaj Interview Michael Beckel About Big Money in the Midterm Elections
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago
  • Supreme Court, Over Noted Dissents of Two Justices, Again Sides with Republicans in Fight over Lowest Advertising Rates for Political Ads
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago