• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Capitalist Principles Cannot Apply to Health Care

Capitalist Principles Cannot Apply to Health Care

August 29, 2016 by Amy Seon Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Capitalist Principles

Our current health care system is deeply flawed.  It is costly, inefficient, and it doesn’t even cover everybody.  Free-market principles have failed with Obamacare because the demand, that is, being sick, has been too high, and private for-profit insurers have been losing money since the cost of providing the service of insuring sick people has been much more than they anticipated.  Major private insurers have therefore decided to drop out of the health exchanges in many states across the country.  Hopefully, this will force lawmakers to finally take a serious look at a single-payer health insurance system, also known as Medicare for all.

Health care should be viewed as a public service, not as an industry, since the way that for-profit insurers make money is by denying health care to the very people who need it. In fact, the reason why Obamacare is failing is because it has not allowed for a public option and has relied primarily on private for-profit insurers.  When the Affordable Care Act was being written, private insurers and the pharmaceutical industry rejected the idea for a public government-run plan to be offered alongside theirs because they knew it would hurt their bottom line.

The current uproar over the price gouging of the anti-allergy and potentially life-saving drug vehicle EpiPen further highlights the inadequacies of our health care system.  Heather Bresch, CEO of Mylan, during a recent interview was unapologetic for her actions of raising the price of the EpiPen, stating that she is “running a for-profit business”.  The very fact that private enterprise is exploiting people’s dependencies on products that keep them alive to make a profit is wrong and inherently in moral conflict.

Capitalist PrinciplesEven with the elimination of its primary competitor last year, free-market defenders argue that Mylan had every right to jack up the price and blamed too much regulation for hampering competition.  Those who don’t believe in regulations and who are blaming the FDA for blocking competition are completely insane.  We are talking about people’s health.  The FDA is not blocking competition.  It is a federal agency, and is there to make sure the drugs that are prescribed to patients are safe.  This type of “regulation” is necessary to make sure the drugs that we take will cure us, not kill us.

Proponents for the pharmaceutical industry argue that drugs are expensive to create, and a lot of funding needs to go into the research and development of creating new drugs, but the EpiPen device was developed by taxpayer funding from our own government.  All Mylan has done is acquire EpiPen from Merck in 2007 and repackaged and marketed it to increase the price by roughly 400 percent.

Capitalism is about having a choice on whether to buy a product or not.  People who need life-saving medications like the EpiPen have no choice.  In countries like Canada, prices are regulated and are therefore much cheaper and are actually affordable.  We need to do the same here.

The answer:  Single Payer.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Canada, Capitalism and Big Business, Socialism and Labor

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Amy Seon

Amy Seon writes for Democracy Chronicles from her home in New York City. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Breaking: Eighth Circuit, on 2-1 Vote, Holds...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 hour ago
  • “As Trump Courts Gifts and Dangles Access, Co...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “When are big-money contributions to super PA...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “The End of the Rule of Law in America”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “The Neutral Criteria Myth”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 4 hours ago