• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | DC AUTHORS | What’s the Fuss Over Committee People in Philadelphia?

What’s the Fuss Over Committee People in Philadelphia?

March 15, 2014 by Stephanie Singer Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Committee People in Philadelphia

by City Commissioner of Philadelphia Stephanie Singer

How do you measure the importance of an election contest? Count how much money is spent? How many TV commercials you’ve seen? How many articles and blogs talk about the contest? By these measures, Governor is the most important contest on the Pennsylvania ballot this year, along with the races for US Congress.

If you measure by the number of people involved in passing petitions and the number of court challenges, you might come to a different conclusion. On March 11 there was a scene in City Hall that probably won’t be equalled for another four years — the crowd of candidates submitting nomination petitions for election to their local Democratic and Republican ward committees. My office had one of its busiest and happiest days as candidates stopped by to show us their signed petitions and signature receipts.

Committee People in PhiladelphiaNot tens, not hundreds, but thousands of Philadelphians are running for these micro local party offices. There will be tens, if not hundreds, of court cases fought before the ballots are finalized.

Why the fuss? These positions don’t come with salaries, staff or even a desk. Committee People in Philadelphia (as the members of the party ward committees are often called) are expected to work hard organizing their neighbors politically. And while they do typically receive some money around Election Day, it’s not enough to explain the hullabaloo or the lawyers’ fees. So why the fuss?

An effective Committee Person has the power to influence her neighbors’ votes and, as a consequence, to demand attention from elected officials more effectively than a single citizen speaking for herself. But this power is due to the relationships the Committee Person maintains, not due to the title. A person could choose to do that work and reap that reward without ever officially running. So why the fuss about these elections?

Here’s the key power of an elected Committee Person: to cast a vote for Ward Leader. Shortly after the May 20 election, each elected Committee Person will be invited to a meeting with all the Committee People from the same party and the same ward — a group of about 30-60 people usually — to choose one Ward Leader. And Ward Leaders have a lot of power within the Philadelphia Democratic and Republican Parties. Ward Leaders alone vote for the Chairman and Treasurer of the parties. Ward Leaders alone decide who will be put on the ballot in a special election. Ward Leaders alone decide how much patronage will be paid to whom within their wards.

Most of the time, it’s the Ward Leaders who have power over the Committee People. Once every four years, the Committee People have power over the Ward Leaders. That time is now. That’s why the fuss.

In just the same way, it’s only once every four years that the voters have power over the Committee People — in the May 20 Primary Election, where voters who are registered as Democrats or Republicans vote for Committee People. Between now and then, one key question to ask the candidates for Committee Person in your neighborhood is whom they support for Ward Leader and why.

 

–

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American Local Elections, American State Elections, Money Politics

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Stephanie Singer

Stephanie Singer is a former City Commissioner of Philadelphia and worked to modernize the office, introducing improved hiring practices, encouraging digital distribution of public elections data, and promoting free and fair elections.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago