• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Common Sense for Uniting America

by Ted Getschman - November 28, 2021

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Common Sense for Uniting America

Min voting divides us.  Max voting unites us.

We are now and always have been politically divided as families, communities, and as a nation: Only about 1 in 5 Trump and Biden supporters say they share the same core American values and goals (Pew Research 8 Oct 2020). People avoid romantic relationships with those who voted for the other party’s presidential candidate (Pew Research 4 Mar 2020). My wife and her brother no longer speak to each other due to political differences. My mom believes our liberal U.S. government is killing off our elderly and babies to manage our population. The U.S. had a civil war that killed 500,000 Americans with muskets and swords, and we don’t use muskets and swords anymore.

What is min voting?

A min voting method is any voting method where each voter picks one candidate (min voter input). This mechanic applies even if the “picking” iteratively happens as it does with instant runoff voting, preferential voting, ranked-choice voting, top-four-top-five voting, or single transfer vote voting.  Min voting divides a population by percentages of votes, pluralities, majorities, and minorities.

What is max voting?

A max voting method is any voting method where each voter evaluates each candidate independently of other candidates (max voter input).  Max voting methods produce high scores or high average scores but do not divide a population into percentages, pluralities, majorities, or minorities.

Why does min voting divide use?

If a candidate wins with a 51% majority they have demonstrated two things.  First, they know they can safely ignore the minority 49% and get elected, and, second, they must keep faith with the 51% if they want to be re-elected. As voters can only vote for one candidate, they will tend to vote for the candidate politically closest to them. In placing their political platform, candidates need to balance the number of voters near their political position (the largest mass of voters forming the majority opinion) with political distance to other candidates. Due to this, min voting creates two power positions, one to the left of the majority opinion and one to the right. The political fringes are weaker due to fewer voters; the majority opinion location is weaker due to proximity to other candidates.

Why does max voting unite us?

Because voters can demonstrate support to every candidate independent of others, all candidates have an incentive to place their political platforms as close to the majority opinion as possible.  As candidate platforms converge, party differences blur, party affiliation becomes inconsequential, collaboration increases, gridlock disappears, and gerrymandering ends.  Finding the majority opinion requires candidates to listen to all of their voters, but voters are not required to change their views, come to a consensus, or have more civil dialogue.  We unite in spite of ourselves.

How do we get max voting?

  • Learn more here.
  • Register your support to institute some form of max voting method here.
  • When we reach supporter level 7 (~3% of the population), you will decide the type of max voting you want (range, runoffs, & “no opinions”—different configurations create approval voting, or STAR voting, etc.)
  • When we reach supporter level 9 (~13% of the population), we will initiate the signature campaign for ballot measures and/or state legislative actions to institute your form of max voting.

Min voting divides us, but max voting unites us without needing to change us.  Do you have a reason not to unite?

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election Methods, Thomas Paine

About Ted Getschman

Ted Getschman has spent years examining the challenges of American polarization from an international viewpoint as he worked with U.S. ally and partner nations during his service as a U.S. Naval Officer.

His personal studies of election methods and voting theory, as well as his work in boardgame design led to his conclusion that solving our national division requires seeing political candidates as players and our election methods as defining their winning strategy and the driver of their actions, either to tear the nation apart or bring it together.

He holds a Master’s of Science in International Relations from Troy State University and developed the Swarm Age on-line tool which he continues to refine for the nation-wide Score Voting Movement. Those interested can find there a draft of his upcoming book, Solving America: How America’s Voting Methods Create Political Polarization, Government Gridlock, and Ignored Voters, and How Score Voting Methods Solve These Problems (and Why Ranked Choice Voting Can’t).

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Common Sense for Uniting America

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

A Dangerous Reprise Of American Exceptionalism In Ukraine

By Jamie Lampidis May 15, 2022

The stakes are too high to cave into Putin’s phantasmatic imperial play, and too high to believe that this war can be won by arming Ukrainians.

On The Coming End Of Roe v. Wade

By Peter J. Dellolio May 11, 2022

Anyone who says that the evolution of law has nothing to do with politics is either very corrupt or very stupid. Laws evolved through the centuries.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

Goodbye Roe v. Wade, Goodbye Rule Of Law

By Andrew Straw May 5, 2022

Congress should impeach judges who act like that because it is not good behavior, and they were asked not to act that way when they were confirmed.

PODCAST: Debating The Future Of Debates

By Jenna Spinelle May 4, 2022

We love a good debate — and have certainly had plenty of them on this show. But how effective are they in today’s media and political landscape?

What “Pro-Palestine” Student Groups Get Wrong

By David Anderson, J.D. May 3, 2022

Back then – as now – this fit into a “colonialist” narrative of European Jews oppressing Arabs – an easy, eye pleasing but intellectually lazy fit.

Examining Government As A “Necessary Evil”

By Gary Berton April 29, 2022

Thomas Paine defines government as separate from society, and indeed if society functioned perfectly there would be no need for government.

Ukrainian And Polish History: Fighting The Empires

By Maxim Sidorenko April 26, 2022

On February 24th, Russia started an unprovoked war against Ukraine. It has become one more attempt of the empire to demolish the Ukrainian state.

PODCAST: What Student Debt Says About Democratic Institutions

By Jenna Spinelle April 26, 2022

In a new book, Josh Mitchell draws alarming parallels to the housing crisis, showing the catastrophic consequences student debt has had on families.

Aging White Men Who Commit Voter Fraud Have Nothing To Fear

By Steve Schneider April 22, 2022

The sentences stand in contrast with the actions of the Governor who recently got the state legislature to create an election integrity police force.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Kenyan 'Cartooning For Peace' To Draw Africa Towards Democracy

Kenyan ‘Cartooning For Peace’ To Draw Africa Towards Democracy

May 17, 2022

Cartooning is an art that has been playing a major role in illustrating stories in different ways, from health to politics, and even sports.

Anxious Leaders Influence Their Followers' Anxiety, Even Online

Anxious Leaders Influence Their Followers’ Anxiety, Even Online

May 17, 2022

Organizational leader’s tweets can influence employee anxieties and this effect is more prominent since the rise of COVID-19, study.

North Korea Cracks Down On 'Capitalist' Pop Culture

North Korea Cracks Down On ‘Capitalist’ Pop Culture

May 6, 2022

North Korea has increased its campaign against “capitalist” style clothing, others, in broader crackdown on foreign pop culture.

DiCaprio, Ruffalo Urge Brazilians To Vote, Irking Bolsonaro

DiCaprio, Ruffalo Urge Brazilians To Vote, Irking Bolsonaro

May 6, 2022

Hollywood stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo joined other celebrities making a final push for voters in Brazil to register to vote.

Mock M&M Election Teaches Alaskans About Ranked Voting

Mock M&M Election Teaches Alaskans About Ranked Voting

April 26, 2022

There are paper cups with eight different kinds of M&M near the entrance to Amalga Distillery in Juneau for a mock ranked choice vote.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy