• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / An End to the Dangerous Corruption of Gerrymandering

An End to the Dangerous Corruption of Gerrymandering

June 19, 2012 by Michael Ossipoff Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Corruption of Gerrymandering Polls

Gerrymandering can be made impossible by using a specific unchanging district-drawing rule that has no human input. Typically it’s automated, but not necessarily.  I’ll briefly describe two: Shortest-Splitline, and Band-Rectangle.

Shortest-Splitline:

Divide the state into two parts, each with a whole number of district populations, and with those two whole numbers as nearly equal to eachother as possible.  Do so in the way that uses the shortest possible straight dividing-line. I’ll call that process “halving”.  Then halve those two halves. Continue repeating the halving until none of the resulting subdivisions contain more than one district.

What I mean, above, by a straight line is a great-circle on a reference-sphere approximation of the Earth (an assumed exactly spherical earth). That line is also a straight line on a gnomonic projection based on that reference sphere.  A great circle on a sphere is the intersection of that sphere with a plane passing through the sphere’s center.

Band-Rectangle:

Map the state, on any map projection. A cylindrical projection would be best, but any will do.

Definitions:

Lines and measurements referred to are lines and measurements on the map. “Horizontal” means in some certain unchanging pre-decided direction (at least roughly) east-west on the map. “Vertical” means perpendicular to horizontal.  “Top” or “Topmost” means most northerly in the vertical dimension. “Bottom” or “bottom-most” means the opposite.  “District population” (sometimes abbreviated “district”) means a population of the size intended for districts. That’s the state  population divided by the number of districts. Divide the state into bands, and the bands into districts as follows:

Starting at the topmost end of the state, successively draw each band by drawing a horizontal straight line on the map, to define the bottom edge of the band. The vertical position of that horizontal line is chosen so that: 1) The band contains a whole number of districts; and 2) When the band is divided into districts, by vertical straight lines, the following quantity will be as close to 1 as possible:

The number of districts in the band, multiplied by the average of the band’s greatest and least vertical measurements, divided by the average of the lengths of the band’s top and bottom straight lines.  Continue till the desired number of districts have been drawn, and the entire state is districted. Those two things will happen at the same time.

Effects of some map projections on the state’s internal district boundaries: 

If the map on which the band-rectangle districting is based is cylindrical, then the internal district boundaries will all be either north-south or east-west. They’ll all be parallels or meridians.  If the map on which the band-rectangle districting is based is gnomonic, then the internal district boundaries will all be great circles (defined above) on an assumed spherical Earth.Those lines will be nearly identical with straight lines as measured on the Earth.

Shortest-splitline is due to Warren Smith. Band-rectangle is my proposal. But I don’t claim either of those proposals was never proposed before. As simple and obvious as they are, they probably have been proposed before.  Shortest-Splitline is more briefly defined. Band-Rectangle is much easier to implement, and needn’t require a computer.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American Corruption, Redistricting

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Michael Ossipoff

Michael Ossipoff writes for Democracy Chronicles from Miami, Florida and is one of our earliest and most prolific authors and creators. His writing covers the world of election method reform verifiable election counts and the importance of independent and third party candidates.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Press freedom groups condemn hearing, demand...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 12 minutes ago
  • Free 2025 Supplement To Laycock & Hasen,...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “Jan. 6 Rioters Are the New Hot Event in Town...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • “Clarence Thomas has long tried to undercut t...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • “Leader of pro-Eric Adams super PAC banking o...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago