• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Echo Chambers

Echo Chambers

June 14, 2021 by Aydasara Ortega Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPin2TweetShares2

Have you tried to explain the rise of political polarization? Or have you not? One explanation is psychological:

We exhibit reasoning biases that lead us to strengthen our ideas on a subject matter. We tend to interpret conflicting evidence as supportive of our thoughts, and seek out arguments that confirm our beliefs, becoming more confident of the opinions we share with our groups: echo chambers.

Another explanation is sociological:

The age of information has made it easier for us to fall into informational traps. We are able to use social media to curate our interlocutors, customizing our web browsers to consume news that reinforce our views: echo chambers.

Have you looked into this? Or have you not?

Now, are these “reasoning biases” biases? Or could these tendencies result from rational processes? What if they arise when rational people are sensitive to the fact that some forms of evidence are systematically more ambiguous than others. What if we can locate the problem not in our choices as individuals but in the structure of our interaction: echo chambers.

Have you thought about this? Or have you not?

“We should think of political polarization less as a health epidemic and more as a tragedy of the commons. That means two things. First, it means focusing less on changing the choices people make, and more on changing the options they’re given. And second, it means recognizing just how smart the “other side” is: that those who disagree with you may do so for reasons that are subtly—exquisitely—rational.”

Echo chambers.

FacebookLinkedInPin2TweetShares2

Filed Under: DC Authors

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Aydasara Ortega

Aydasara Ortega Torres writes for Democracy Chronicles from New York. She is a Faculty Member of Psychology at the College of Mount Saint Vincent. Also take a look at her website for more of her work.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • “5th Circuit May Have Sidelined Supreme Court...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Federal Court Says Jeffrey Clark Cannot Remov...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Wisconsin: “Secret impeachment advisory panel...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Poll: Majority of voters would support disqu...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 4 hours ago
  • Morocco expels French journalists Quentin Mül...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 5 hours ago