• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Debate over how to elect NC judges gets uglier

By DC Editors - December 16, 2017 Leave a Comment

FacebookTweetLinkedInPinShare1

The voting wars continue in North Carolina. The following is from an excerpt from the article ‘Debate over how to select NC judges gets uglier’ by Mark Barrett of the Citizen-Times. Continue reading here:

Democratic senators walked out of a legislative study committee meeting Wednesday on judicial selection after the committee chairman refused to let Gov. Roy Cooper’s representative speak at the meeting, according to accounts by The News & Observer of Raleigh and others.

Critics responded that it is important for judges to be independent from the General Assembly precisely because they are asked to pass on the constitutionality of laws it passes. Of course governors, who appoint judges in many states, have a stake in judges’ decisions too. But GOP legislators appear to be particularly stung by several court rulings that have overturned laws they passed after Republicans took control of the General Assembly in 2011.

The following is the latest news an article House leader: Judicial deal may not be ready in January from the Associated Press. Continue reading here:

Chances may be fading for approving dramatic changes to how and from where judges are selected in North Carolina when the General Assembly reconvenes briefly in a few weeks, a key state legislator said Friday.

Senate leaders have since created a panel to scrutinize the maps as well as alternatives to the head-to-head judicial elections the state has used for 150 years. Many lawyers, including Chief Justice Mark Martin, have said the election system should be replaced. Senate Republicans have suggested judicial redistricting could be passed in tandem with judicial selection overhaul pushed by the House.

The panel has met three times, but its members, particularly the majority Republicans, don’t yet sound unified on whether they want to make a change, let alone what change they’d prefer.

A great analysis of the debate on both sides can be found at a new article “Democrats sue to try to restore 2018 judicial primaries“. The following is from an excerpt from the article written by Gary D. Robertson of the Charlotte Observer, showing the Republican point of view:

GOP lawmakers have said the judicial primary cancellation would give them more time to study potential changes to judicial election districts and possible “merit selection” of judges. But party attorneys John Wallace and Eddie Speas wrote in the complaint that “no compelling or important regulatory interest justifies” the elimination.

Senate leader Phil Berger, one of the lawsuit’s defendants, said in a release that Cooper and the Democratic Party were the ones trying to manipulate partisan outcomes by going yet again to court because they are “unable to win control of the legislature at the ballot box or to sustain the governor’s veto of legislation that doesn’t serve their political goals.”

FacebookTweetLinkedInPinShare1

Filed Under: American Democracy Originals Tagged With: American State Elections, Judicial Elections

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Syria Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | American Democracy Originals | Debate over how to elect NC judges gets uglier

Primary Sidebar

donate button

America After Trump

By Jenny Oak Tree

Our country must grieve and we must understand the trauma that has been created by Trumpism. Only then can the United States rise again.

Teaching Voting Theory With a Card-Based Voting Game

By Steve Cobb

This uniquely inventive new game’s name ‘Concurrence’ is a play on words: it means “agreement” in English and “competition” in Russian.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

U

By Aydasara Ortega

Data governance surfaces as key terrain on which to regulate firms engaged in datafication by responding to the injustices of informational capitalism.

On The Dynamics of Abortion. And Argentina.

By David Anderson, J.D.

There’s big news from Argentina lately. By a fair margin abortion was finally legalized there last month after decades of grassroots activism.

An Expat American in the Middle East Discusses Trump Concerns

By Steve Schneider

Democracy Chronicles author Steve Schneider interviews ex-pat American Jason Meursault who shares his overseas perspective on the Capitol riot.

Why Trump Should be Impeached

By Jack Jones

Trump’s tenure was a reign of terror. The 6 Jan insurrection is ground for Senate impeachment to prevent him from causing further damage to our democracy.

On Approval Voting and the National Popular Vote

By Steve Cobb

Though written without regard for alternative voting methods, maybe the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is OK.

Is Giuliani a Speech-Maker or a Criminal Instigator?

By Steve Schneider

Rudy Giuliani is Trump’s personal lawyer. He has spoken in two rallies that became criminal riots, including the Jan 6, 2021, mob attack on The Capitol.

Democracy Counts in Georgia; D.C. in Chaos

By Steve Schneider

Major upheavals in American politics saw democrats winning Georgia on Jan 5, 2021 while on Jan 6 a Trump mob attacked The Capitol to stop certification of Biden’s victory.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Protest Art from Around the World

Foundation Publishes Protest Art from Around the World

Art has been a powerful medium of protest and creative expression to expose the deception and social bankruptcy of tyranny.

Protecting Californian Elections

How Bad Jokes Complicated Protecting Californian Elections

Public records show California’s scattershot cybersecurity approach ensnared some people who say they were joking.

Kanye West Kept Off the 2020 Arizona Ballot

Why Was Kanye West Kept Off the 2020 Arizona Ballot?

On September 8, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a short order saying Kanye West could not be on the ballot as an independent candidate for president.

Political Comedy Helps Young Adults

Study Claims Political Comedy Helps Young Adults

Interesting news on this front comes from the University of Pennsylvania: New research suggests that humor may

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy