• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

The Election to Decide Future for Australian Refugees

by Abbie Hallinan - June 21, 2016

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Australian Refugees

As the refugee crisis around the world proliferates, the upcoming Australian election provides a critical opportunity for the public to shape the future lives of refugees and the abusive nature of Australian refugee policies. Despite the 8-week extension of the Australian campaigning period, Liberal and Labour parties are continually failing to provide adequate policy proposals and strategies to resolve Australia’s appalling refugee regime.  

The voices and opinions of Australian citizens have been evidently ignored and shaped by the egocentric ideologies of both the Liberal and Labour parties. The new 2016 – 2017 Australian national budget sparked controversy over the current refugee regime in Australia: it failed to reserve money for closing the inhumane and torturous offshore processing centres operated by the government. As a result, with the extension of the current campaign, Liberal and Labour parties have been clearly distinguishing their stances on refugee policies amongst the Australian public.

At first glance, the decreasing living conditions of refugees worldwide appear to have been exacerbated by conflict in Syria, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Iraq. Yet, I question how much this could have been lessened if the Australian government were to change its xenophobic, realist policies and increase the admission of refugees in Australia. Instead of continually disposing of refugees in the pacific islands, Turnbull could have very well surrendered his priority of sustaining ‘White Australia’, in favour of upholding Australia’s accord to the human rights charter of the United Nations.

Australian RefugeesPolicies imprisoning refugees on isolated Pacific Islands, such as the Nauru and Manus Island detention centres, continue to be maintained by both the Liberal and Labour parties. The Manus Island, however, is being shut down from the initiative of Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister, Peter O’Neill. The Australian government was asked to immediately make alternative arrangements for asylum seekers, as the PNG Supreme Court determine Australia’s detention of asylum seekers on Manus island illegal.

If it takes another nation to call out the proscribed behaviour of the Australian government, and the two major political parties refuse to publicly recognise the inhumane conditions – what will it take for Australian refugee policies to change? And more importantly, what will the future look like for refugees seeking safety and security in Australia?

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton recently commented that refugees are not “numerate or literate in their own language, let alone English” and therefore have no place in Australian society. Shortly following, a Labour spokesman stated that Mr Dutton should retract his statement and apologise for his deeply xenophobic and offensive comments, as Australia has a strong history of multiculturalism. Yet, considering our treatment of Indigenous peoples in Australia, it is hardly surprising. If Australia cannot treat it’s own minority group with dignity and respect, the chances for respecting and accepting refugees in Australia is far slimmer.

Unsurprisingly, Current Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull continues to turn a blind eye at Australia’s human right abuses, in hope that no one acknowledges his ratification of Australia’s contemptible refugee regime. In preparation for the upcoming election and in response to the national budget, the Liberal Party has held strong on its stance on stopping the boats. In fact, they so much as declared that this action was integral to restoring the “integrity of Australia’s borders”.  When did denying the human rights of individuals fleeing war zones and perilous living conditions begin to facilitate the “integrity” of Australia’s borders? Integrity is the principle of having strong moral principles, and evidently, there is no integrity here.

All hope for the Labour party to offer an appealing alternative is rather dim. Despite efforts of the Labour party appearing to be fighting for refugee policy reform, their proposals do not provide adequate solutions. Policies of the Labour party are merely surface level and deprived of any substance.  Labour candidate, Bill Shorten, aims to change the Liberal party’s reverting efforts of turning away boats and undermining international law. Additionally, Labour is aiming to increase the annual humanitarian intake in Australia from 13,750 to 27,000 – almost double that of the previous Abbott government.

Rather than maintaining Australia’s sovereign borders, the proposed policies of the Labour party account more for the interests of refugees. Unfortunately, much to the surprise of the Labour party and the Australian public, maintaining ‘humane’ offshore processing facilities does not quite meet the standards of international law, nor does it resolve the objectionable refugee policies in Australia. The only resolve emerging from this policy is the continual cycle of misfortune for refugees seeking safety.

Australia has an international responsibility to accept those fleeing war and dangerous living conditions – so when will it live up to its responsibilities and leave integrity, sovereignty and economic security behind? Will individuals seeking protection in Australia be refugees forever?

LINKS

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/18/peter-dutton-says-illiterate-refugees-would-be-taking-australian-jobs

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/2016/federal-budget-offers-no-new-hope-worlds-refugees/

http://www.alp.org.au/asylumseekers

https://www.liberal.org.au/our-plan/protecting-our-borders

 

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Asia, Australia

About Abbie Hallinan

Abbie Hallinan writes for the Democracy Chronicles from Melbourne, Australia. Having lived in Australia, America and New Zealand, she has developed a broad perspective on international relations and politics. She is currently at the University of Melbourne studying a Bachelor of Arts (Politics & International Relations and Anthropology) and a Diploma of Languages (French).

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | The Election to Decide Future for Australian Refugees

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy