• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / A New Way to Encourage Political Participation By Design

A New Way to Encourage Political Participation By Design

October 14, 2018 by Fred Gohlke Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Encourage Political Participation By Design

This is part five of a six article series. All six articles have now been published:

  1. A New Proposal For A Practical Democracy Built On Public Agreement
  2. The Flaws In Our Existing Voting Machinery
  3. Creating A More Democratic Process By Correcting Existing Flaws
  4. The Mechanics Behind A New Election System
  5. A New Way To Encourage Political Participation By Design
  6. Practical Democracy: The Next Step In The Evolution Of Democracy

We looked at the flaws in a political system that empowers those with the resources to divide and conquer the people. Then, we set forth the steps required to change that by sifting through the electorate to find those best able to serve the public interest. It may seem difficult to imagine how such a system would work, but it’s actually quite easy.

Thinking Through The Process

Inviting Participation

To create a bottom-up arrangement that lets every member of the community influence political decisions to the full extent of each individual’s desire and ability, the people must be invited to participate in the political process.  We can accomplish this if, before an election, the Mayor of a town writes to each voter:

Encourage Political Participation By Design

Group Members:

  • Dorothy Citizen, 319 Maple Street (394-519-8882)
  • Harold Watkins, 2518 Prospect Avenue (394-519-7029)
  • Laura Hunt, 30 Minue Street (394-519-5174)

Description

When the people of a community are invited to participate in the political process, the media will be reporting that the people are selecting their political leaders and will describe the process.  Most people will meet as requested. Some will meet because they are good citizens and some to influence the events in their community. Some will be unwilling to participate but they will not be a great loss.  If they have no interest in the welfare of their community, they are unlikely to contribute anything valuable to their peers.

Whether or not the triads make a selection depends on many variables, including the makeup of the group.  Random selection of triad members will produce innumerable arrangements of gender, religion, race, and political persuasion.  In addition, the participants may be people of unequal financial resources, unequal intellectual capacity, unequal dress habits, and a multitude of other human differences, any or all of which may affect the way members of the group relate to each other.

If we try to think through how these meetings will go, we quickly realize we cannot guess what the triads will discuss.  In the simplified illustration above, there will be more than 8,000 triads discussing their anxieties about their community.  The range of issues that concern them is huge and it is unlikely all the triads will have the same concerns.

Trying to think through all the possibilities makes the process seem difficult, but, for real people, for the actual participants in the process, it’s quite simple:  They meet and agree which conditions in their town most concern them and which of them is the best advocate for correcting those conditions – or they don’t.

As we consider the process, we find there is only one thing we know for certain:  When a triad advances one of its members, the members have agreed on the issues that most concern them and the person best able to address and resolve those issues.  Given the abundance and diversity of public issues and the difficulty of achieving perfect agreement, it is likely the triads will advance people whose internal gyroscopes (as described by Mansbridge) are in line with their peers’.

When those chosen meet at the next level, they will discuss their concerns as well as those brought up by their new triad-mates. In the course of the discussions, some issues will be judged to have greater effect on the community than others.  The important thing, throughout the process, is not what issues the triads discuss, it is that individuals advance because their peers agree with them. The result is a political system built on agreement rather than confrontation.

As we’ve seen, it’s not difficult to include everyone in the political process. In my next article, we’ll look at why it works and how it can be implemented.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Direct Democracy and Referendums, Election Methods

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Fred Gohlke

Fred Gohlke writes for Democracy Chronicles from New Jersey. He has been a proud American for a long time and was born in his grandfather's house on a farm near Alexander, NY. Fred spent 5 years in the U. S. Air Force. He served in Okinawa during the Korean War. His greatest hope is that, by expressing his thoughts, he will inspire someone to challenge them. Only then can we begin the slow process of evolving a more democratic political system for the humans among us. See his full bio for more information.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 3 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 months ago