• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

A New Way to Encourage Political Participation By Design

by Fred Gohlke - October 14, 2018

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Encourage Political Participation By Design

This is part five of a six article series. All six articles have now been published:

  1. A New Proposal For A Practical Democracy Built On Public Agreement
  2. The Flaws In Our Existing Voting Machinery
  3. Creating A More Democratic Process By Correcting Existing Flaws
  4. The Mechanics Behind A New Election System
  5. A New Way To Encourage Political Participation By Design
  6. Practical Democracy: The Next Step In The Evolution Of Democracy

We looked at the flaws in a political system that empowers those with the resources to divide and conquer the people. Then, we set forth the steps required to change that by sifting through the electorate to find those best able to serve the public interest. It may seem difficult to imagine how such a system would work, but it’s actually quite easy.

Thinking Through The Process

Inviting Participation

To create a bottom-up arrangement that lets every member of the community influence political decisions to the full extent of each individual’s desire and ability, the people must be invited to participate in the political process.  We can accomplish this if, before an election, the Mayor of a town writes to each voter:

Encourage Political Participation By Design

Group Members:

  • Dorothy Citizen, 319 Maple Street (394-519-8882)
  • Harold Watkins, 2518 Prospect Avenue (394-519-7029)
  • Laura Hunt, 30 Minue Street (394-519-5174)

Description

When the people of a community are invited to participate in the political process, the media will be reporting that the people are selecting their political leaders and will describe the process.  Most people will meet as requested. Some will meet because they are good citizens and some to influence the events in their community. Some will be unwilling to participate but they will not be a great loss.  If they have no interest in the welfare of their community, they are unlikely to contribute anything valuable to their peers.

Whether or not the triads make a selection depends on many variables, including the makeup of the group.  Random selection of triad members will produce innumerable arrangements of gender, religion, race, and political persuasion.  In addition, the participants may be people of unequal financial resources, unequal intellectual capacity, unequal dress habits, and a multitude of other human differences, any or all of which may affect the way members of the group relate to each other.

If we try to think through how these meetings will go, we quickly realize we cannot guess what the triads will discuss.  In the simplified illustration above, there will be more than 8,000 triads discussing their anxieties about their community.  The range of issues that concern them is huge and it is unlikely all the triads will have the same concerns.

Trying to think through all the possibilities makes the process seem difficult, but, for real people, for the actual participants in the process, it’s quite simple:  They meet and agree which conditions in their town most concern them and which of them is the best advocate for correcting those conditions – or they don’t.

As we consider the process, we find there is only one thing we know for certain:  When a triad advances one of its members, the members have agreed on the issues that most concern them and the person best able to address and resolve those issues.  Given the abundance and diversity of public issues and the difficulty of achieving perfect agreement, it is likely the triads will advance people whose internal gyroscopes (as described by Mansbridge) are in line with their peers’.

When those chosen meet at the next level, they will discuss their concerns as well as those brought up by their new triad-mates. In the course of the discussions, some issues will be judged to have greater effect on the community than others.  The important thing, throughout the process, is not what issues the triads discuss, it is that individuals advance because their peers agree with them. The result is a political system built on agreement rather than confrontation.

As we’ve seen, it’s not difficult to include everyone in the political process. In my next article, we’ll look at why it works and how it can be implemented.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Direct Democracy and Referendums, Election Methods

About Fred Gohlke

Fred Gohlke writes for Democracy Chronicles from New Jersey. He has been a proud American for a long time and was born in his grandfather's house on a farm near Alexander, NY. Fred spent 5 years in the U. S. Air Force. He served in Okinawa during the Korean War. His greatest hope is that, by expressing his thoughts, he will inspire someone to challenge them. Only then can we begin the slow process of evolving a more democratic political system for the humans among us. See his full bio for more information.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | A New Way to Encourage Political Participation By Design

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

In California politics, you must find your inner terminator

By Joe Mathews March 23, 2023

To protect ballot initiatives from continuous opposition, one needs robust endurance and tenacity akin to Schwarzenegger’s.

Harnessing The Power Of Juries

By Jenna Spinelle March 23, 2023

Juries are a democratic institution. They provide an important site for democratic action by citizens and their use should be revived.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

Quality Education and Prioritizing Children: Fighting GOP Exploitation

By Jack Jones March 14, 2023

The GOP has turned its back on the educational needs of America’s youth. We need to invest in our children and protect their futures.

Finding the “We” in Civic Engagement

By Jenna Spinelle March 4, 2023

Collective action problems arise for people who want to get things done. Forming functional groups is key to effective civic engagement.

Taking Cues From The American Oligarchy

By Jack Jones February 20, 2023

The more the GOP has become complete obedience to their oligarch masters, the more they are driving the right winged minded fringe.

How california made a polish poet great

By Joe Mathews February 8, 2023

Exiled to Berkeley, Czesław Miłosz explored the margins of alienation, the horrors of his past, and visions of the future.

What Will It Take To Make Democracy More Representative?

By Jenna Spinelle February 8, 2023

Multiple dimensions of identity simultaneously shape pathways to candidacy and representation for all groups seeking a seat.

Courts Off The Deep End, Again

By Andrew Straw February 1, 2023

Closing the courts, shutting down dissent, and violating the rights of whistleblowers. These are not the actions of an open, free society.

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

1800s Barbershop Converted To Voting Rights Museum

1800s Barbershop Converted To Voting Rights Museum

March 16, 2023

El Paso’s Project XV Museum, Texas’ first voting rights museum, has been built over the last year by David Strother, a barbershop owner.

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

January 30, 2023

Russian mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin responded to comparisons [with]…Rasputin who treated the son of the last tsar for haemophilia.

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

January 30, 2023

Newly-launched AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT is changing the internet landscape. It presents several opportunities, including in education.

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy