Some interesting new research was recently published by experts Adam Bonica and Maya Sen at an American Economic Association journal. Take a look at the research abstract here:
We review the substantial literature on estimating judicial ideology, from the US Supreme Court to the lowest state court. As a way to showcase the strengths and drawbacks of various measures, we further analyze trends in judicial polarization within the US federal courts.
Our analysis shows substantial gaps in the ideology of judges appointed by Republican Presidents versus those appointed by Democrats. Similar to trends in Congressional polarization, the increasing gap is mostly driven by a rightward movement by judges appointed by Republicans. We conclude by noting important avenues for future research in the study of the ideology of judges.
Also, see related Democracy Chronicles articles like those on the Voter Access, Voter Turnout, or even seen our section on American Democracy.
Daniel Jones says
Isn’t the best kind of “Justice” less served, by this Ideological Polarization?
Is there an institution that devoted Itself to the study and Evolution of “Pure Justice”? (Justice For Justice Sake} and not tainted and distorted through Political Ideological Agendas?
I wish there is. I believe there Could be. I believe there Should be.