• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Thoughts on the Evolution of Democracy

by Fred Gohlke - January 19, 2019

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Thoughts on the Evolution of Democracy

Politics involve two fundamental factors:  (1) The organization of interactions among humans, and (2) our natural focus on providing food, clothing and shelter for ourselves and our families.

As the number of humans in close proximity to each other increases, the need for organization of human interactions increases, but the majority of people are more concerned with their own needs than they are with the needs of their society.  This results in a power vacuum that is filled by power-hungry individuals who gratify themselves by providing the organization (rules) the society needs.

These power-hungry individuals are autocratic.  When their rule is considered excessive by the people, the people demand a greater say in their own governance.  Successful autocrats recognize the latent power in the people they rule and do what they can to meet their people’s needs without compromising their own authority.  Unsuccessful autocrats inflame the people to revolt.

Revolutions require leaders.  Usually, the leaders are power-hungry individuals who seek to replace the existing order.  They are, or become, masters of inciting public ardor in their favor. Their goal is not to empower the people, but, in recent centuries they have used that as their rallying cry.  That was true, even in our own country, where the leading figures, with the exception of George Washington who strenuously opposed their efforts, formed political parties to support their bid for power.

True democracy has no champions.  It offers no rewards for individuals or vested interests; it gives no individual or group an advantage over others.  Hence, it offers no incentive for power-seeking individuals or groups to advocate its adoption.

Democracy will not succeed until we recognize that there are many among us with the ability and the integrity to improve our lives. We must devise a way to seek them out and raise them to public office as our representatives in our government.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Dictatorships, Election History, Founding Fathers

About Fred Gohlke

Fred Gohlke writes for Democracy Chronicles from New Jersey. He has been a proud American for a long time and was born in his grandfather's house on a farm near Alexander, NY. Fred spent 5 years in the U. S. Air Force. He served in Okinawa during the Korean War. His greatest hope is that, by expressing his thoughts, he will inspire someone to challenge them. Only then can we begin the slow process of evolving a more democratic political system for the humans among us. See his full bio for more information.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Liam M says

    February 3, 2019 at 5:29 pm

    I want epistocracy to replace the current “one person one vote” form of democracy. I want a moderate form of epistocracy, which is not too undemocratic. The results should represent what people would vote for if they were well informed.
    I feel like more knowledgeable people would make less selfish decisions, because they can predict the societal impact of policies, not just the personal effect. Actually, many voters are bad at knowing whats good for themselves as well.
    The main issue with epistocracy is how to implement it. How do you determine how knowledgeable people are without partisan bias? There should be research on how to implement epistocracy.
    I’m also an advocate for the use of citizens assemblies. While referendums are notorious for being poisoned by misinformation campaigns, citizens assemblies are made of citizens who are brought into the loop, as they get to join a debate.
    Fearmongering is also a huge issue in democracy. While epistocracy would reduce it’s efficacy, I also think people need to be educated to recognize it.

    Reply
    • Fred Gohlke says

      February 4, 2019 at 1:51 pm

      Good Afternoon, Liam M

      Can you tell me, in epistocracy, who decides which citizens have the political knowledge to rule? I ask because it seems to me you are talking about the Practical Democracy concept, which is described here on Democracy Chronicles at
      https://democracychronicles.org/practical-democracy/
      The Practical Democracy process provides the filtering and selecting mechanism that lets the citizens decide decide which of their number have the political knowledge and ability to advance the common interest. That sure sounds like epistocracy to me and it offers several advantages:

      * It eliminates money from politics,
      * it incorporates partisanship without letting partisans control the process,
      * it completes more quickly than our present system,
      * it functions without political campaigns or the marketing of candidates,
      * it enables and encourages dialogue and deliberation on political issues among the electorate,
      * it lets the people change their representatives as they see fit,
      * it is a bottom-up arrangement that lets every member of the community influence political decisions to the full extent of each individual’s desire and ability,
      * it ensures that candidates for public office are examined carefully BEFORE they are elected, and
      * it builds on agreement by the members of the electorate rather than on confrontation.

      Is that not the essence of an epistocratic political process? If you’d care to critique it in terms of the system you seek, I’ll respond as thoughtfully as I can.
      Fred Gohlke

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Thoughts on the Evolution of Democracy

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy