• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Finish Off Brexit And Stop Embarrassing The Democracy

Finish Off Brexit And Stop Embarrassing The Democracy

November 20, 2019 by Mats Sederholm 3 Comments

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Finish Off Brexit
Artwork by Banksy – Image source

It is 3½ years since Britons voted for an exit and still, the British Parliament has not been able to deliver what the voters decided. It was not part of the vote to clarify HOW it would be done, if it would be a hard or soft Brexit, for example, only THAT it would, or would not, be done. It is the task of the political system to take care of HOW as well as THAT it happens, and it has failed at both.

The main reason for this, from what we hear in news broadcast after news broadcast from all over the world, is a boundlessly painful process where adults in the room behave like selfish kids. The members of the House of Commons, including the Speaker, have created something that can be likened to a parliamentary coup that gives them the opportunity, on a daily basis, to put forward new proposals and then vote them down. We see a parliament in which everyone is given the chance to set terms and block them at will, depending on their special interests. We see a government that is unable to rule, and an opposition that defies it at every turn. We see parliamentarians without any respect whatsoever for the voters’ decision and instead, many politicians and much of the media lay the blame for the Brexit mess on the electorate who, they say, voted the “wrong way” and created it.

Anti-Brexit supporters are seeking a new referendum, even though the problem is obviously down to Parliament and the politicians. What would a new referendum achieve besides a second chance for the Remainers and for the secret dream of the whole European establishment that, covertly, they may be able to get their way? Furthermore, seventy percent of the British public do not think a second referendum would be any help as the country is still as divided on the issue of leaving the EU as in 2016, although the marginal majority is now the Remainers. Everyone understands that a new referendum cannot be called every time there is a marginal change in public opinion.

All factions have agreed on a new general election, but only on their own terms. Currently scheduled for the 12th of December, if it gets off the ground, it is nothing but a cry for help and not a decision made out of consideration for the voters. The British Parliament has simply hacked its way out of the Brexit mess; a mess that may well continue forever after the election if the same parliamentarians reclaim their seats.

In my most secret fantasies, I see an international political decontamination brigade that, out of nowhere, blasts a hole in the wall of the House of Commons, and flushes it clean with high-pressure washers. And afterward, Democracy’s own security forces install a new parliament which acts on behalf of the voters, and the decision administrators, the MPs, are subordinate to the decisions and not the other way around.

Order! Order!

There are those alongside me who harbor dark thoughts, apparently. According to surveys conducted by Cardiff University and the University of Edinburgh, British voters, whether for or against Brexit, think that “the risk of MEPs being subjected to violence” is “a risk worth taking.”

Great Britain, it’s time to let go of the EU now. In unbalanced relationships, you come to a point where it hurts more to stay put than to leave. It is better to release the tension, to part and from this find a new foundation from which to work. Right now, the whole of Europe is getting daily doses of learning that our democracy and parliamentary systems no longer deliver. The fact that extreme political alternatives are popping up in the wake of this is a consequence for which none of those who defend the development gutlessly should blame any other “extremist force”.

At the moment, British politicians are blocking the work of the EU and all of Europe. You actually have to get a move on!

At the same time, it is regrettable that the UK should leave the EU because I believe that all international forces, not least the UK, are needed to counter the greatest threats to humanity; the climate, the finance industry, right extremist forces and diminished confidence in democracy. The latter keeps growing every hour that goes by. The political fatigue in the UK will, if it has not already done so, reach the same levels as, for example, in Greece after the 2015 election or as in today’s protesting Chile and other parts of South America.

A new democratic regime and a deeper involvement of voters, a bottom-up-democracy with a chance to have greater influence in politics and to participate in social and economic issues are the only things that can rebuild people’s respect for politics and parliamentarians. We would have needed Great Britain to push for this in the EU. Instead, they are becoming a cautionary example.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: England, Europe

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Mats Sederholm

Democracy Chronicles author Mats Sederholm was born in 1957 and today lives close to the capital of Sweden, Stockholm. Colliding Worlds (co-written with Linda Bjuvgård) is his first book to be released in both Swedish and English. His aim is to continue to help perpetuate an increasing awareness of system faults and standards which prevent human development.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. David Anderson says

    November 22, 2019 at 1:33 pm

    Excellent article even if I disagree with much of it.
    If you have time do enjoy (my) https://democracychronicles.org/english-psycho-and-brexit/

    It seems to me the Brits voted for something they didn’t understand so a grown up idea would be – now they seem to understand – to put it to them again.

    A referendum discounts and removes REALLY important stuff in any political decision. For eg.
    “Do you want to pay more property tax?” (Californian referendum in the 70s)
    “NO, fuck no. I hate that tax” Californians understandably said. — but nobody told them: “Fine, you’ll have no more property tax but your universities will be unfunded, and your roads as will your medicare and other stuff you wouldn’t ordinarily de-fund if you saw the entire picture….”

    In a similar way “Do you want your old UK blue passports back and leave the EU?” was asked in the referendum: They never asked (as they should have): “Do you want your old blue passport back and leave the EU — AND screw your economy, leave you tradeless, and wreck peace this century?” THat’s why referenda are shit.
    Thx for your article though. respect, D.A., NYC

    Reply
    • mats sederholm says

      November 24, 2019 at 1:22 pm

      Hi David

      Thanks for the interest.

      “It seems to me the Brits voted for something they didn’t understand so a grown up idea would be – now they seem to understand – to put it to them again. ”

      Yes and no. This is ALWAYS the case more or less before a referrendum.
      Sweden had a referrendum for a EU membership 1994.

      Who did understood what that meant? People had not a clue, still a referrendum is completely valid.

      The validity of a referrendum shall not be based on the amount on knowledge among voters preceding the referenuim. It’s based on democracy and people’s right to make that decision. It’s up to each individual to gather knowledge or to completely dismiss information. Democracy can never be based on information. That would pave the way for a really dangerous path away from democracy.

      Mats

      Reply
    • mats sederholm says

      November 24, 2019 at 1:39 pm

      And David I read your article, well wtitten, I got your point of circumstances precedeing a referendum!!

      But, campaigns and propaganda is something else that always precedes referendums or elections.

      Every day the establishment completely fill your mind and emotions with bullshit. It’s done every single day on all media channels. Mostly they share the same view of economy, politics and social matters and every attempt to break away from status quo order is attacked with fair or unfair methods.

      A week before the Swedish election to EU 1994 the polls said a people’s NO.
      The last week, the establishement-machine start doing their job with advertisements, politicians and “adults in the room” telling the Swedes that voting FOR a membership is the only sane choice.

      So, sorry but in my opinion there are no fair circumstances preceding an election or a referrendum. Brecit is not an exception.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “Minnesota assassination prompts many lawmake...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • DOJ weighs in in Alabama preclearance
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “N.Y.C. Mayoral Primary May Hinge on Early Vo...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Amid upcoming redistricting deadline, massiv...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • “Hawaiʻi Senator Didn’t Disclose Possible Con...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago