• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Free Speech: Scope And Relationship With Democracy 

by Livert Ngum - September 17, 2021

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin
Free Speech: Scope And Relationship With Democracy 
Image source

What free speech is

Free speech or freedom of speech can be defined as the right to express oneself without censorship. In procedural or evolutional terms, it can be taken to mean the end of repression and the beginning of expression.

Conceptualization and Codification

When a baby is born it signals its entry into to the world with a cry. Free speech is, therefore, a natural right. But its conceptualization can be traced by to Greek philosophers like Socrates who was persecuted in 399 BC for arguing that it should be promoted. Its codification can also be traced to the 1215 Magna Carta. Many court cases have come up in the U.S on the question of free speech. These cases, like the Schenck V United State in 1919, Brandenburg V Ohio in 1969, etc have often ended with judgements that uphold this basic human right.

The scope

Many people often posit that free speech is a right to uphold but there are widespread disagreements as to what it stands for. The debate arises from the very concept itself that is composed of two words that have two different meanings that are important in human life. The words “free” and “speech” are important in every society. For example, speech does not only mean verbal communication but can also be expressed through photographs, motion pictures and written text which is supposed to be free in one way or the other to express human feelings. But to what extent can such forms of speech can be considered free.

Content and materialization

In the United States of America (USA) like elsewhere, freedom of speech excludes every form of expression that is harmful to the physical integrity of others and to private property, or that conveys messages that are offensive or of a racial nature. Free speech is therefore materialized when people are allowed to say whatever they like to say whenever they like to say and wherever they would like to say what they have to say as long as it doesn’t infringe on the rights of others.

A set of rights and obligations

Our natural human and democratic rights are without doubt inalienable. They, therefore, figure at the summit of all rights and are fully granted without the kinds of obligations that come with all other kinds of civic and political rights. However, this is only a matter of proportions as the natural law of “to every right comes an obligation” applies. This means that Freedom of speech comes with responsibilities and can, therefore, be restricted. Any restriction on free speech may be put in law and well explained so that people can understand them.

Rationale for restrictions

Speech can be restricted to prevent harm to other people. In this situation, harm is seen as the violation of a person’s right. Therefore, speech can be restricted when it unambiguously incites violence, threat, fraud, and others. Harm in speech restriction is mostly misunderstood by many people. For instance, if a speech causes a political candidate to lose a vote, that does not give reason for restricting that speech because the harm is not the direct result of that speech but people’s understanding and reaction to the message transmitted. Also, the type of harm in question must not be subject to the subjective interpretations of a few.

Types of restrictions: censorship and free speech

The concept of censorship is tightly attached to that of free speech and it goes with what kinds of restrictions are applied and who implements these restrictions. In some societies, people have been banned from talking in public places due to remarks they have made which are unacceptable or can stir up trouble. Some people tend to see censorship as a violation of free speech while others say it is a question of government restriction. But that is exactly where the problem lies. Some governments exercise censorship in order to prevent people from expressing dissident opinions often on the pretext that these views are extremist. A close inspection shows that governments that are akin to such practices aim at preserving power. Government should be barred from censoring speech, period!

Censorship from within the populace itself

John Stuart Mill a British philosopher argued that:

“that the chief threat to free speech in democracies was not the state, but the “social tyranny” of one’s fellow citizens. And yet today, the civil libertarians who style themselves as Mill’s inheritors have for the most part failed to refute, or even address, the arguments about free speech and equality that their opponents are making”.

He goes ahead to say that

“…the influence of social pressure and disapprobrium can sometimes be a very powerful means of shutting down legitimate discussion and suppressing or marginalizing minority points of view. Furthermore, an abstract right to freedom of speech does little good if one cannot find a venue to speak or printer to publish one’s ideas. If we think that freedom of speech is in general something that is valuable, therefore, it seems reasonable that we would regard both private and government restrictions on such freedom as at least potentially worthy of concern. It does not follow, of course, that we should have the same standards or criteria for determining the circumstances in which it is appropriate for each party to infringe on such freedoms. We may, for instance, think it inappropriate for a university to refuse to host a speaker merely because they disagree with the stance of that speaker and find his views objectionable. However, if that same speaker has engaged in discriminatory and demeaning speech directed at certain minority groups, we may think it justified for the same university to refuse them a platform, even if we do not regard the harm done by this speech as sufficient or direct enough to warrant government restriction of that speech”.

Free speech and the type of political system

Whether a dictatorship or a democracy, free speech is an inevitable positive fatality! Democracy is not limited to a government by the majority. It is equally a government in which the voting rights of the electorate are conveyed through freedom of speech. If free speech is not institutionalized, codified and frameworks set in place for the populace to be guaranteed the freedom to air their views without fear of the police, then democracy might become a one-day affair during which people vote on the election day and then for the next few years (2-7 in general) are subjugated to the dictatorship of the ruling party.

Freedom of speech allows people to express their concerns, raise their voice and disapprove government policy, thus allowing people to indirectly rule the nation. But if the government threatens people when they challenge its policies and there is a blatant failure to protect the right to freedom of speech, then democracy has simply collapsed. Here, the government is finally a dictatorship, even if that government was chosen through elections.

Conclusion

Freedom of speech is seen to be an important part of democracy as it protects the minority rights to partake in politics and decision-making. Freedom of speech ensures that the tyranny of the majority is put to check. The government elected by the majority often claims to be working for all, including the minority but would certainly not give the right to the same minority or even to members of the majority to air their views if freedom of speech is not tightly protected. For fairness, there must be equality of political participation and there must be equality before the law. Free speech is the only guarantee for the average citizens to enjoy both rights.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Journalism and Free Speech

About Livert Ngum

Livert Ngum is a journalist who writes for Democracy Chronicles from the city of Bamenda in Cameroon. She studied journalism and media at National Polytechnic Bamenda.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Free Speech: Scope And Relationship With Democracy 

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

New Tech Helps Citizens Audit The Vote

By Steve Schneider August 9, 2022

Rebuilding trust in our democracy would require high-quality verification in the form of audits that will stand up in the court of public opinion.

2022: Year Of Radical Change For Camp Lejeune Justice

By Andrew Straw August 4, 2022

Indiana has been a purple state dominated and oppressed by Republicans who stack every deck in their own favor, all three branches.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

Here At The Crossroads, To Lead Or Be Led

By Jack Jones August 1, 2022

We will only have a chance to save our imperiled democracy if we work to reverse discriminatory laws like Citizens United.

Laboratories Against Democracy

By Jenna Spinelle July 25, 2022

Jake Grumbach’s book “Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics” is out now from Princeton University Press.

Mass Shootings: Time To Ramp Up Citizen Action

By Jack Jones July 20, 2022

Those controlling the levers of power need to be confronted on these issues and made uncomfortable enough so that they can act.

Harnessing The Power Of “We The People” On Independence Day

By Jenna Spinelle July 3, 2022

Democracy does not have a singular definition, which is one of the things that makes it so interesting to me — and undoubtedly to many of you.

Florida Doesn’t Need a Speech Czar

By Steve Schneider June 28, 2022

Full disclosure: I’m a liberal Democrat. So, I won’t be sending in my vote-by-mail ballot for Ron DeSantis in November. Nor will I vote for him in 2024.

Introducing: When The People Decide

By Jenna Spinelle June 25, 2022

Several activists and average citizens have changed their communities and the country by taking important issues directly to votes.

Democracy’s Summer Blockbusters

By Jenna Spinelle June 8, 2022

The summer will be legally and politically charged particularly with the January 6 committee hearings scheduled to begin June 9.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

July 28, 2022

A Latina suffragette and one of New Mexico’s first female officials during the 20th century will have her image stamped on the US quarter.

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

July 6, 2022

Magnum photographers accustomed to exploring crisis regions have been challenged to capture the quiet operation of Swiss democracy.

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

June 8, 2022

The murder of Sidhu Moose Wala has brought attention to the link between Punjabi music and India’s cross-border criminal networks.

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

June 4, 2022

Higher education is now seen as a new political cleavage, with level of education increasingly important in describing political attitudes.

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

May 25, 2022

The atmosphere in the interstate polling booth in Sydney’s inner east resembled that of an emergency room waiting for a donor organ.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy