• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / How Modern Consumerism Has Changed Art and Culture

How Modern Consumerism Has Changed Art and Culture

December 25, 2012 by Michael Sainato Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Modern Consumerism Andy Warhol
Pop-Art of the 60s: Andy Warhol’s Marilyn Monroe Nine

As Christmas is upon us, it may be a good time to reflect on the culture of consumerism that has enraptured the globe. In Walter Benjamin’s The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, Benjamin discusses the mass reproduction of art and its effect on what Benjamin coined as the “aura” of the art itself in which the artwork’s presence in time and space is lost through the means of reproduction. The reproduction strips the artwork of its function as an individual unit. Although Benjamin’s discourse focuses on art itself, using film and photography as his main examples, his analysis is applicable to the culture industry itself. Popular culture is created to function in the best interests of the economy and everything is filtered by the culture industry.

Studying Modern Consumerism and Modern Art

The selection mechanism as to what is authoritatively produced and distributed to the masses is contingent upon investment capital and those who control it. Traces of spontaneity are controlled due to the dependency upon such vast amount of capital in order to be widely distributed.

Culture itself is manufactured. Consumers are classified, labeled, and organized by the manufacturers who view them only as statistics in which more capital, money, and power can be gained through further distribution of reproductive cultural entities.

Benjamin begins his discourse with a quote that summarizes how innovation and technology have been constantly transforming culture. “Our fine arts were developed, their types and uses were established, in times very different from the present, by men whose power of action upon things was insignificant in comparison with ours” (Benjamin, 1051). The quote from Paul Valery alludes to the transformation of art due to technological breakthroughs that revolutionized the distribution and techniques of art itself.

Access to art was severely limited due to technological constraints thus limiting art itself due to the cultural constraints that such confinement, in terms of exposure, caused. Benjamin’s discourse begins with a sense of optimism, which deteriorates as the capitalist mode of production—and its cultural effects—are discussed. With such widespread reproduction of art and culture itself, the aura of the artwork itself is lost along the way as what is considered to be art becomes disillusioned amongst widespread reproduction with alternate motives.

Through the capitalist mode of production, art becomes intended to suit capitalist interests rather than being a unique form of individual expression. Benjamin states that such conditions of mass production “neutralized a number of traditional concepts—such as creativity and genius, eternal value and mystery,” (Benjamin, 1052) Benjamin goes on to quote Paul Valery once again in the first part of his discourse, stating that auditory and visual images became marginalized to something hardly more than a sign.

The aura of an artwork is lost during reproduction. It loses its “unique existence in a particular place,” (Benjamin, 1053). The copying of the artwork detaches its essence from the artist and loses that personal connection. Famous artist Pablo Picasso said that “Art is a form of magic designed as a mediator between this strange hostile world and us.”

Most recently in our culture technological innovations have distorted art and disrupted the function that art serves as a mediator in understanding the world we live in. “By replicating the work many times over it substitutes mass existence for a unique existence,” (Benjamin, 1054).

Modern Consumerism and Tech

Technological innovations have led to the emergence of new art forms such as film and photography. In doing so traditional concepts of art have been overthrown and production has overflowed the cultural filter so that art as a form itself loses its own aura. The traditional concept of the definition of art is transformed by such technological reproduction but at the cost of its essence.

Art was becoming so reproduced that it took on different goals and approaches such as Dadaist’s attempt at counterculture, which eventually was culminated with the surrealist movement. In a more modern sense art has been developed into so many forms of entertainment to the point in which the aura is so far removed that it lacks any artistic qualities or skills as technological advancements replace or remove these things.

Due to the mass reproduction of art, art has transcended beyond its function as a specialized field of humanism for better or worse.

Quality has been sacrificed for quantity as mass reproductions of imagery serve different functions without focusing on aesthetic representation in the form of beauty. Mass reproduction has outmoded the primary necessity for art to inhibit specialized techniques and training.

Such exploitative motives ruin art and serve popular culture only as a means to reinforce elitism amongst the established power. Benjamin cites egalitarianism as the ideological condition for the constant decay of art. ‘

Benjamin cites two circumstances, “the desire of the present day masses to ‘get closer’ to things spatially and humanly, and their equally passionate concern for overcoming each thing’s uniqueness by assimilating it as a reproduction” (Benjamin, 1055) as reasons for the loss of the aura in question.

Capitalist motives are the root for such ideologies to gain influence over the masses in order to fuel reproduction. Benjamin cites the phrase “l’art pour l’art” which means “art for art’s sake,” which was a sentiment to preserve the aura as a reaction to the first revolutionary means of reproduction and many counter culture movements have emerged since then.

Benjamin’s discourse advocates a sense of optimism with the emergence of culture industry and its role in transforming art. Benjamin cites massive active participation as a positive aspect of technological reproduction. He refutes notions that popular culture is a form of escapism from the drudgeries of capitalism that causes the masses to be docile and subservient to the elite.

Benjamin argues that by advocating contemplation and absorption of such art forms, such art forms are gradually understood and mastered, in other words through dialectics. By constantly searching for truth and maintaining an open mind for resolutions between disagreements, the masses could transcend such seemingly destructive influences as popular culture.

Modern Consumerism Conclusion

Popular culture serves capitalist interests because of the industries that depend upon it for reproduction. Such industries are indebted to particular ideologies that were formed in order to preserve and further influence upon the masses. Popular culture is an authoritative outlet for such extensions of influence.

See also Democracy Chronicles Political Art page!

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Anarchism, Capitalism and Big Business, Celebrity Politics, Political Artwork, Socialism and Labor, Voting Technology

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Michael Sainato

Michael Sainato writes for Democracy Chronicles from Albany, New York. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “Revisiting Section 2 and the Electors Clause...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 12 hours ago
  • “Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC failed to pay swin...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago
  • Turkish journalist Furkan Karabay arrested ag...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 16 hours ago
  • Tunisian journalist’s health rapidly deterior...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 17 hours ago
  • Pakistani journalist’s YouTube channel blocke...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 18 hours ago