• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Drawing the Line in Liberal America

by DC Editors - January 2, 2016

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Liberal America

For the first time in American history, Social Liberals outnumber conservatives. Our country is fast changing, and as John F. Kennedy said, “Change is the law of life”. Unfortunately, America is changing too much. We are beginning to lose our core values, all so we can say we support change. Americans should take a step back, and fully assess the situation before making uninformed decisions on what we support.

Massachusetts currently has a new bill (HB 1577) which will be reviewed again in January of 2016. HB 1577 is “An Act Relative to Transgender Anti-Discrimination”. In 2011, the Massachusetts House and Senate passed “An Act Relative to Gender Identity”, which banned discrimination against transgender individuals in housing, employment, lending, and public education. It was a groundbreaking bill, making the commonwealth one of eighteen states to have legal protections for the transgender community.

Now members of Boston Based Gay & Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) and supporters of the LGBT community are pushing for more legislation. Supporters of the Bill feel it is necessary because it would “Protect people in the Transgender community in public accommodations”. On the Opposing Side, the Republicans feel there is “Potential for Abuse” and would “Pose a Privacy Set to Others”. HB 1577 will not be passed unless the Democrats can somehow gain the Republicans Support. In order to override a veto from Governor Baker (R), the Massachusetts Senate and the Massachusetts House of Representatives would have to have bipartisan support.

Democrats Argument for HB 1577

GLAD has stated that this Bill would finish the job on the 2011 legislation. Democrats such as Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy III and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey have called for support of this Bill. GLAD has also made it known that passing this Bill would be vital to transgender people being able to live full, productive lives as themselves. Without it, they argue that it could compromise the individual’s physical and mental health.

Current Massachusetts laws ban discrimination in public accommodations based on “age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, sex, religion, and marital status.” HB 1577 would add gender identity to this list of personal characteristics, expanding protection to both transgender individuals and people who do not identify with a specific gender.

In 2013, Fenway Health, a LGBT healthcare, research and advocacy organization founded by Northeastern University students and headquartered in Boston conducted a survey within the Massachusetts transgender community to assess how much discrimination transgender people had faced since the 2011 Bill. Out of 452 people surveyed, 65% disclosed that they had faced some sort of discrimination in public since 2011. Mason J. Dunn, President of the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition, says that there is “A large category of public spaces unprotected from discrimination.”

Republicans Argument Against HB 1577

Governor Charles Baker has been hesitant on HB 1577, and has voiced the same concerns as all Republicans. The Republicans support the 2011 Bill, but don’t feel that additional legislation is required. HB 1577 could pose a security threat to others. The Massachusetts Family Institute feels that gender identity is too “loosely defined”. They feel this can compromise the security of non transgender people.

Passing this Bill would also be passing the potential for lots of abuse when it comes to women and children in the Republicans eyes. They argue that the bill would also allow sexual predators to claim “confusion” about their gender in order to gain unquestioned access to private areas.

Since the law does not require a person to have a documented problem with gender confusion, there is no way to distinguish between those people that this bill is designed to help and the people who would abuse its existence to fulfill any number of deviant desires. The legislation also opens up businesses and law enforcement officials to civil and even criminal penalties for “discriminating” on the basis of gender identity.

In Boston, which has a city-wide ordinance, police officers were sued and their department fined $20,000 after they responded to a complaint from a women’s shelter by removing a man from the women’s bathroom at that facility. It is also unclear why this bill is needed, since the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), the state agency entrusted with addressing discrimination claims, is already able to handle cases brought by transgendered individuals in public accommodations under existing law. In addition, female athletes are concerned that this law would force single-sex school sports teams to accept student athletes of any gender, creating chaotic locker room situations and dangerous on-field environments.

The language of the bill also specifically targets women’s-only fitness centers, shelters, and other single-sex facilities.

Personally, I find HB 1577 totally unnecessary, and I think anyone who cares about the well being of Massachusetts’s citizens would have the discernment to vote against this bill. Any sexual predator can claim “confusion” over their gender identity and immediately get unquestioned access into strictly women’s areas. This is not a matter of discrimination; it is a matter of protecting the public.

Passing this Bill would be totally irresponsible. Transgender people have gained all the rights necessary to living a prosperous life thanks to “An Act Relative to Gender Identity”. HB 1577 places a burden on families, business owners, and law enforcement. The MCAD stated as early as 2001 that “We hold that “sex” discrimination, as prohibited by chapter 151B, includes a prohibition against discrimination against transsexual individuals.” This completely disproves the point made by Attorney General Healey that “Massachusetts law does not adequately protect transgender people.” We cannot sacrifice security. I feel America must evolve, but as a country, we must evolve while still embracing our core values.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: LGBT People and Democracy, Women Voting Rights

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. R-J says

    March 8, 2016 at 11:00 am

    Please, keep telling me that I have all the rights and privileges I need while I am denied food at a restaurant or that I have been denied service and discriminated against at a hospital.

    Stop perpetuating fear mongering.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Drawing the Line in Liberal America

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

In California politics, you must find your inner terminator

By Joe Mathews March 23, 2023

To protect ballot initiatives from continuous opposition, one needs robust endurance and tenacity akin to Schwarzenegger’s.

Harnessing The Power Of Juries

By Jenna Spinelle March 23, 2023

Juries are a democratic institution. They provide an important site for democratic action by citizens and their use should be revived.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

Quality Education and Prioritizing Children: Fighting GOP Exploitation

By Jack Jones March 14, 2023

The GOP has turned its back on the educational needs of America’s youth. We need to invest in our children and protect their futures.

Finding the “We” in Civic Engagement

By Jenna Spinelle March 4, 2023

Collective action problems arise for people who want to get things done. Forming functional groups is key to effective civic engagement.

Taking Cues From The American Oligarchy

By Jack Jones February 20, 2023

The more the GOP has become complete obedience to their oligarch masters, the more they are driving the right winged minded fringe.

How california made a polish poet great

By Joe Mathews February 8, 2023

Exiled to Berkeley, Czesław Miłosz explored the margins of alienation, the horrors of his past, and visions of the future.

What Will It Take To Make Democracy More Representative?

By Jenna Spinelle February 8, 2023

Multiple dimensions of identity simultaneously shape pathways to candidacy and representation for all groups seeking a seat.

Courts Off The Deep End, Again

By Andrew Straw February 1, 2023

Closing the courts, shutting down dissent, and violating the rights of whistleblowers. These are not the actions of an open, free society.

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

1800s Barbershop Converted To Voting Rights Museum

1800s Barbershop Converted To Voting Rights Museum

March 16, 2023

El Paso’s Project XV Museum, Texas’ first voting rights museum, has been built over the last year by David Strother, a barbershop owner.

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

Russian Wagner Boss Acknowledges Comparison With Rasputin

January 30, 2023

Russian mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin responded to comparisons [with]…Rasputin who treated the son of the last tsar for haemophilia.

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

ChatGPT Is Changing Education, AI Experts Say

January 30, 2023

Newly-launched AI-powered chatbot ChatGPT is changing the internet landscape. It presents several opportunities, including in education.

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy