• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Mail-In Ballot Postage Is Unnecessary Cause Of Voter Anxiety

Mail-In Ballot Postage Is Unnecessary Cause Of Voter Anxiety

November 2, 2018 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Mail-In Ballot Postage
Absentee ballot envelope from Colorado with British stamps – Image source

From ProPublica‘s Susie Armitage:

You can send your ballot in without a stamp, so why doesn’t anyone tell you that? At the absentee ballot parties organized by assistant professor Allison Rank and her political science students at the State University of New York at Oswego, young voters can sip apple cider and eat donuts as they fill out their ballots. But the main draw is the free stamps.

“The stamp was actually the thing I was concerned about,” one freshman told Rank after she explained the process of completing and mailing in a ballot. According to Rank, only one store on the rural upstate campus sells postage. It has limited hours and only takes cash, which many students don’t carry.

It’s not only students who may be short a stamp this election. An increasing number of Americans vote by mail in an age when fewer of us have a reason to keep postage on hand. But it’s long been an open secret among election officials: Even though the return envelopes on many mail-in ballots say “postage required,” the U.S. Postal Service will deliver even without a stamp.

“In cases where postage on returning Absentee or Vote-By-Mail ballots has not been affixed or is insufficient, it is the U.S. Postal Service’s policy to not delay returning ballots to the appropriate Board of Election as addressed on the return ballot envelope,” Postal Service spokesperson Kim Frum said in an email to ProPublica. “The Postal Service is steadfast in our commitment to support democracy. We will not deny a voter their right to vote by delaying a time-sensitive ballot because of insufficient postage.”

Someone has to pay for that stamp, however, which is why neither the Postal Service nor election administrators publicize the fact that your ballot will be delivered without it.

“It’s absolutely the case that postage is required; it’s just a question of if the voter fails to put sufficient postage on, what happens then,” said Tammy Patrick, senior adviser for the elections program at the Democracy Fund.

Some election jurisdictions prepay the postage for ballots to be returned. In those that don’t, many election offices have what’s called an “overage” account with the Postal Service. This means that if you forget a stamp, or don’t affix sufficient postage for a multipage ballot, the Postal Service will calculate the remaining amount due and bill the election office for it. If your local election office doesn’t have an overage account, your ballot instructions have to say how much postage is required to return the ballot, down to the cent. If you don’t put on the right amount, the Postal Service picks up the tab.

Patrick said that if voters started leaving stamps off their mail-in ballots en masse, it could significantly drive up election administration costs. “We know there are tens of millions of voters who receive their ballots by mail,” she said.

Multiply that by 50 cents for a first-class stamp, or more for longer ballots that require two or three stamps, and the overage charges could run into millions of dollars per election.

Some argue that exercising the right to vote shouldn’t incur a cost on principle, even if it’s the relatively low price of a stamp or two. Maria Swanson, a voter in Pasco County, Florida, was “horrified” to see the words “postage stamp required” on her ballot. “My husband looked at me and said, Who cares about a stamp, but what if you’re elderly or what if you don’t have stamps? How can voting require a stamp?” she told ProPublica. “I never heard in my life of any fee associated with voting.”

Whitney Quesenbery, co-director of the Center for Civic Design, a group that has worked with election officials in California to design vote-by-mail materials, said: “It would be wonderful if it was free postage for all ballots because that’s part of democracy. After all, you’re not using up space at a polling place, you’re reducing lines and keeping the election moving along by voting by mail.”

In 2016, U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey, a Texas Democrat, introduced a bill called the Postage Free Ballot Act, which would give the Postal Service the funding to cover postage for all mail-in ballots. Veasey compared the cost of stamps to a poll tax. “When I was a campaign worker, you would meet people who would want to vote but didn’t have any money for postage,” the lawmaker said in an interview with McClatchy. “It happens more often than people think.” The bill stalled in Congress.

If you’re unsure of the postage required to mail back your ballot, contact your local election office. In some jurisdictions, you can also drop off your ballot at a voting location in person or place it in a secure drop box.

You still have time to get your ballot in the mail, but you’d better hurry. In some states, mail-in ballots must be received by Election Day to be counted, while in others ballots have to be postmarked or received by another specific date. Check with your local elections office to be sure.

You can solve other Election Day-related anxieties using ProPublica’s guide, The Informed Voter’s Guide to Making Sure Your Vote Counts.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Absentee and Mail Voting, Voter Access, Voter Turnout

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “‘We’re going to beat you to death with audits’: Brad Raffensperger gears up to oversee his final election in Georgia”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • Roger Marshall’s complicated history of blurring the line between taxpayer dollars and campaign cash”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • “Who Won the Redistricting War?”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago
  • “Unaggrandizing the Partisan Gerrymander”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago
  • “Trump Has Cast Doubt on Elections on 440 Days in His Second Term”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 day ago