• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Moneyed Interests, Information Provision, and Congress

Moneyed Interests, Information Provision, and Congress

May 17, 2022 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Moneyed Interests, Information Provision, and CongressThis article by Alexander C. Furnas, Timothy M. L. Pira, Alexandra Hertel-Ferdinandez, Lee Drutman, Kevin Kosar, is published by Sage Journals. Here is an excerpt:

It is well established that wealthy donors and large corporations gain more access to Congress than average citizens (Bauer, Sola Pool, and Dexter 1963; Hansen 1991; Langbein 1986; McKay 2018, 2020). It is less clear how, or even if, such privileged access yields legislative action.

Since at least Schattschneider (1960), political scientists have been concerned about elite influence in representative institutions. Recently, scholars have focused more attention on whether out-sized economic resources afford political actors privileged access and influence in the policymaking process (Bartels 2008; Bowman 2020; Gilens 2012; Grossmann and Isaac n.d.; Hacker and Pierson 2010; Jacobs and Skocpol 2005; Lax et al. 2019; McKay 2018; Schlozman et al. 2012). While some have questioned the relationship between economic resources and political clout (Ansolabehere et al. 2003; Baumgartner et al. 2009; Branham et al. 2017; Enns et al. 2014; McCarty and Rothenberg 1996; Prasad 2018; Witko et al., 2021), other research has documented that greater economic resources afford wealthy campaign donors and private sector businesses more opportunities to shape public policy (Drutman 2015; Hall and Wayman 1990; Hertel-Fernandez et al. 2018; Miler 2010; Miler 2018; McKay 2012; Kalla and Broockman 2016; Page and Gilens 2017).

This scholarship has extended to work documenting how political elites—including state legislators and senior staff in Congress—misjudge their constituents’ opinions in ways that systematically favor concentrated economic interests (Broockman and Skovron 2018Broockman, David E., Skovron, Christopher. 2018. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 542‐563.

View Full Reference List; Hertel-Fernandez et al. 2019). These studies suggest that the wealthy and well-organized interests enjoy greater access because politicians incorrectly believe their self-interests are congruent with constituents’ interests.

Find more information on this article here. Also, visit the main Democracy Chronicles section on American Democracy or our articles on Money Politics and Worldwide Corruption.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Election Science, Money Politics

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • After weeks of attacks, CPJ calls for protection of journalists during Serbia election
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 46 minutes ago
  • “Understanding warrants for mid-election records”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 55 minutes ago
  • “72 percent drop in approving new citizens leaves would-be voters in limbo”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 hour ago
  • “Why Reported Challenges With Touchscreen Voting Machines Don’t Signal Election Rigging”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 hour ago
  • Citing preamble to NVRA, DOJ sues to enjoin certification of Alaska’s Senate race (it won’t go anywhere)
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago