• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | DC AUTHORS | Accountability and Transparency Key to More Women Candidates

Accountability and Transparency Key to More Women Candidates

March 21, 2014 by Stephanie Singer Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

More Women Candidates Needed

by Stephanie Singer, City Commissioner of Philadelphia 

Here are some interesting numbers:
About 50% of registered Democrats in Philadelphia are women.
About 50% of Democratic Committeepeople elected in 2010 in Philadelphia are women.
About 36% of Democratic Ward Leaders are women.
About 16% of Philadelphia officials elected to citywide office are women

And how many women are listed on the website of the Philadelphia Democratic Party in leadership roles? As Bill Clinton would say, “Zee-row”.

The under-representation of women in the Philadelphia Democratic Party might just be a consequence of the lack of transparency and accountability that I wrote about last week. Last week’s message seems to have hit a nerve of some kind. Spokesmen for the party machine status quo are on the defensive, saying that they are simply following the party rules. Well, I’ve been reading the Democratic Party rules, and they make clear that the wholesale disempowerment of Democratic voters and Committeepeople in Philadelphia is in violation of national and state party rules for the conduct of local party committees.

Let’s start at the top. The National Democratic Party values transparency. The bylaws of the Democratic National Committee (Article 9, Section 12) specify that “All meetings of the Democratic National Committee, the Executive Committee, and all other official Party committees, commissions and bodies shall be open to the public, and votes shall not be taken by secret ballot.” So according to the rules of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, all official meetings of the Philadelphia ward leaders should be open to the public.

The State Democratic Party values accountability. The bylaws of the Democratic Party of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Rule VII, Section 1) specifies that the members of the Philadelphia City Committee are those elected in the Spring Primary Election in the year the Governor is elected. In other words, the members of the official Philadelphia Democratic City Committee are supposed to be the Committeepeople directly elected by the voters — not just the Ward Leaders. 

The Democrats of Philadelphia deserve transparency and accountability. The current system doesn’t serve the voters. Some people try to justify the status quo by saying that the party machine turns out Democratic voters, but that is hogwash. Over and over again, Democratic candidates lose statewide — for US Senate, for PA Governor and, devastatingly, for statewide courts — because the Democratic Party of Philadelphia fails to get the vote out in the November elections. Even the victories in the last two Presidential elections are more likely a result of the huge, modern, friendly Obama campaign organization than any homegrown party activity.

Luckily, we live in a democracy, and we can use the power of the vote to demand transparency and accountability. The next election in Philadelphia is on May 20.

Sincerely,
Stephanie

PS: Now is a great time to apply for an absentee ballot.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election Transparency, Women Voting Rights

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Stephanie Singer

Stephanie Singer is a former City Commissioner of Philadelphia and worked to modernize the office, introducing improved hiring practices, encouraging digital distribution of public elections data, and promoting free and fair elections.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 months ago