• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Is a Direct National Popular Vote a Good Idea?

by DC Editors - February 10, 2012

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Is a Direct National Popular Vote a Good Idea?

Multiple States Considering Changing the Way They Elect President Through a Direct National Popular Vote

Democracy, elections, and voting at Democracy Chronicles

Responding to Media Personality Jason Lewis’ Critique of the National Popular Vote Initiative

Author: Rich Rubino

Minnesota talk radio show host Jason Lewis warns: ‘Here’s What Happens If The National Popular Vote is Made Prime’ Mr. Lewis is perturbed by the fact that the movement known as the National Popular Vote Initiative (NPVI) is picking up momentum. The NPVI is an interstate compact, wherein participating states agree to award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.  The agreement would be activated once enough states (constituting the requisite 270 electoral votes needed to win a Presidential election) agree to the compact.

Lewis is incorrect in stating that the NPVI was inspired by Al Gore.  As Lewis later admits in his article, the compact enjoys support from across the ideological spectrum. Prominent conservatives, with no love for former Vice President Al Gore, support the NPVI because it will give every voter a seat at the electoral table. Conservative stalwarts, including former U.S. Senators Jack Garn (R-UT), and Fred Thompson (R-TN), and former U.S. Representative Tom Tancredo (R-CO) are steadfast backers of the compact. Tancredo calls it ‘a constitutional way of saying that every vote should count.’

Lewis makes the flawed assertion that this compact would result in ‘deciding the presidential race by pure democratic rule.’  In fact, the NPVI compact in no way leads the nation down the slippery slope of Democratic rule. The President would simply be elected the same way Americans elect Cemetery Commissioners, County Coroners, Governors, and U.S. Senators. All are decided by which candidate garners the most votes. The NPVI merely makes every vote equal and discourages Presidential candidates from allocating the preponderance of their time and resources in just 15 showdown states.  The Founding Fathers respected federalism, and abrogated the method of awarding electors to the states in Article ll, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution which states: ‘Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.’

Lewis goes on to assert that: ‘Campaign Resources are finite and in a popular-vote scenario, less populated states would remain fly-over country as candidates flocked to the most populated urban centers.’  Mr. Lewis is correct in this respect, in that campaign resources are in fact finite.  However, Presidential candidates would likely make a play for votes in every state given the fact that the electoral objective would be to win a numerical victory.  With this in mind, local campaign volunteers would be galvanized in every state, and candidates would make efforts to cultivate as many local precinct captains as possible.

With advertising being inexpensive in many small states, campaigns would likely buy spots in Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.  Voter turnout would likely increase because the majority of American voters who reside in safe states would actually think their vote mattered.  As for Lewis’ supposition that candidates would spend the preponderance of their time in ‘urban centers,’ that would be counterproductive to their campaigns. The nation’s top 25 cities comprise only 12of the American electorate. The nation’s five largest populated cities constitute just 6of the nation’s aggregate electorate.

Accordingly, to win the national popular vote, a candidate must appeal to the large majority of Americans who do not live in these urban centers.  At the state level, candidates do not spend all their time and resources only in urban centers. In 2010, Texas Governor Rick Perry was re-elected by 13 percentage points, despite being overwhelmingly defeated in the state’s two largest cities: Houston and Dallas. In fact, these two Loan Star cities are two of the largest populated U.S. cities. In New York, George Pataki served three terms as Governor despite the fact that he was wiped out in the nation’s largest city, New York City. Finally, California has elected four Governors in the last 46 years who did not even come close to carrying the state’s largest city, Los Angeles.

Lewis is correct when he opines: ‘A republic does not rest on pure majority (mob?) Rule. It incorporates various checks and balances to filter the majority and protect the minority.’

Yet the NPVI in no way establishes ‘mob rule.’ The template for the governance system that the Founding Fathers established came from the Roman Republic. Under the Roman system, the people do not directly govern themselves. Instead, they select fellow citizens to represent them, and these representatives in turn determine who will hold the office of the Presidency.  Under ‘mob rule’ the citizenry would vote on the issues themselves and the majority vote would decide the outcome.  This is diametrically opposed to what the NPVI is advocating.

Finally, Lewis wonders whether the NPVI is constitutionally permissible, pointing to Article 1 Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution which states: ‘No state shall, without the consent of Congress … enter into any agreement or compact with another state …’ However, the protocol for the U.S. Congress is to consider an interstate compact ‘after’ all participating states have signed on.  Federal Case Law dictates that the Compact Clause should not be read literally.

In the 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case of U.S. Steel Corporation v. Multistate Tax Commission, Justice Lewis Powell, writing for the majority, argued: ‘Read literally, the Compact Clause would require the States to obtain congressional approval before entering into any agreement among themselves, irrespective of form, subject, duration, or interest to the United States.’  That being said, to avoid the protracted litigation process that could ensue, National Popular Vote is working to introduce legislation in the U.S. Congress for Congressional consent of the compact.

Lewis, like many other detractors of the NPVI, has an unfounded fear of the effects of the compact.  However, the agreement among the willing states will simply create a situation wherein every vote is equal in every election cycle. This will not result in the electoral apocalypse.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/responding-to-media-personality-jason-lewis-critique-of-the-national-popular-vote-initiative-5647701.html

About the Author

Rich Rubino, of Marblehead, MA is the author of The Poilitical Bible of LIttle Known Facts in American Politics. He holds a B.A. in Communications (Media Track) from Aassumption College and an M.A. in Broadcast Journalism from Emerson College.

Is a Direct National Popular Vote a Good Idea?
Get Out the Vote!
FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Election Methods, Electoral College, Proportional Representation

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | AMERICA | Is a Direct National Popular Vote a Good Idea?

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

A New Approach To Breaking Our Media Silos

By Jenna Spinelle August 12, 2022

It’s no secret that there’s a partisan divide in the media, but thus far, solutions to bridge that divide have been few and far between.

Carmel’s Cautionary Tale for Post-Roe America

By Joe Mathews August 10, 2022

The lesson is about… the human horrors of letting judges, or anyone else, determine our rights on the basis of history – especially when history omits so much.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

New Tech Helps Citizens Audit The Vote

By Steve Schneider August 9, 2022

Rebuilding trust in our democracy would require high-quality verification in the form of audits that will stand up in the court of public opinion.

2022: Year Of Radical Change For Camp Lejeune Justice

By Andrew Straw August 4, 2022

Indiana has been a purple state dominated and oppressed by Republicans who stack every deck in their own favor, all three branches.

Here At The Crossroads, To Lead Or Be Led

By Jack Jones August 1, 2022

We will only have a chance to save our imperiled democracy if we work to reverse discriminatory laws like Citizens United.

Laboratories Against Democracy

By Jenna Spinelle July 25, 2022

Jake Grumbach’s book “Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics” is out now from Princeton University Press.

Mass Shootings: Time To Ramp Up Citizen Action

By Jack Jones July 20, 2022

Those controlling the levers of power need to be confronted on these issues and made uncomfortable enough so that they can act.

Harnessing The Power Of “We The People” On Independence Day

By Jenna Spinelle July 3, 2022

Democracy does not have a singular definition, which is one of the things that makes it so interesting to me — and undoubtedly to many of you.

Florida Doesn’t Need a Speech Czar

By Steve Schneider June 28, 2022

Full disclosure: I’m a liberal Democrat. So, I won’t be sending in my vote-by-mail ballot for Ron DeSantis in November. Nor will I vote for him in 2024.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

July 28, 2022

A Latina suffragette and one of New Mexico’s first female officials during the 20th century will have her image stamped on the US quarter.

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

July 6, 2022

Magnum photographers accustomed to exploring crisis regions have been challenged to capture the quiet operation of Swiss democracy.

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

June 8, 2022

The murder of Sidhu Moose Wala has brought attention to the link between Punjabi music and India’s cross-border criminal networks.

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

June 4, 2022

Higher education is now seen as a new political cleavage, with level of education increasingly important in describing political attitudes.

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

May 25, 2022

The atmosphere in the interstate polling booth in Sydney’s inner east resembled that of an emergency room waiting for a donor organ.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy