• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | American Democracy Originals | Ohio Election Integrity Protected by Early Voting Ruling

Ohio Election Integrity Protected by Early Voting Ruling

September 1, 2012 by Adrian Tawfik Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Avoid Ohio Election Integrity
Avoid the Lines and Vote Early

Rick Hasen’s Election Law Blog Covers Big Win For Ohio Election Integrity and American Democracy

Democracy, elections and voting at Democracy Chronicles

If you want the full story on election reform news, there are few better places than expert Rick Hasen’s Election Law Blog. With the recent early voting court ruling in Ohio, it is again the Election Law Blog that has the best coverage. First, there is the post Breaking News: Federal Judge Orders Ohio to Restore Weekend Early Voting in Ohio Weekend Before Election Day. Hasen gives his analysis of the ruling and the impact:

I thought we were done with blockbuster election law decisions before Labor Day, but now comes this order from a federal district court in Ohio in Obama for America v. Husted granting a preliminary injunction enjoining the state from enforcing a new law barring early voting on the weekend before election day.  The state had such voting in 2008 but eliminated it in 2012 except for UOCAVA voters–including military voters, who might be deployed at any time.

The judge first noted that the state did not mandate that election boards provide military voters who might be deployed at any time an actual right to cast an early ballot.  It instead left the question to local election boards.  Using the Anderson/Burdick balancing test and the right to no arbitrary and disparate treatment recognized in Bush v. Gore and other cases, the Court held that taking away early voting for all voters except (possibly) the UOCAVA voters violated the equal protection clause:

From the onset of this litigation, Defendants have pointed to special concerns for the military—concerns all parties share—and the military’s need to maintain additional access to in-person early voting. But for UOCAVA voters, what is left is, potentially, one day: Monday. Defendants have presented no evidence to sustain the inference that in-person early voting on Monday—one day—will burden county boards of elections to the extent that the injury to Plaintiffs is justified.

Moreover, Defendants undercut the virtue of their support of military voters by failing to protect any significant measure of UOCAVA voting. Unless a serviceperson is “suddenly deployed” at exactly the right time—enabling in-person voting on Monday—he or she will likely be unable to vote, depending on the local elections board’s “discretion.” That the State cannot justify its interest in foreclosing Ohio voters for one day emphasizes the arbitrary nature of its action.

Election Law Blog also has links to some other interesting articles on the subject.  The first is an National Public Radio (NPR) link to a radio talk show on the subject that can be found here.  It has the following introduction on the NPR website:

A federal judge has ruled that an Ohio law which would change early voting rules cannot take effect. The law would limit early voting in the final days before an election to military personnel. Pam Fessler talks to Melissa Block.

Also, Election Law Blog had a link to a Bloomberg News article “Ohio Must Restore Three Days Of Early Voting, Judge Rules” written by Andrew Harris and Margaret Cronin Fisk that can be found here.  The article explains:

Fights over voting access are intensifying in swing states including Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvaniaand Wisconsin, where both Republican and Democratic presidential campaigns see a possibility of victory. Voter cases are also under way in Alabama, Texas and South Carolina.

Today’s decision follows two rulings this week by federal judges in Washington rejecting laws passed by Texas’s Republican-dominated Legislature and approved by Republican Governor Rick Perry. One stopped the state from requiring photographic identification to vote. The other blocked a redistricting plan that the court said would discriminate against black and Hispanic voters.

Rick Hasen, the brain behind Election Law Blog is described by Wikipedia as “the William H. Hannon Distinguished Professor of Law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, California, United States.”  It further states that “Hasen’s area of expertise is in election law and campaign finance regulation.” Another interesting link that I found was https://www.earlyvoting.net/

Ohio Election Integrity

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: American Democracy Originals Tagged With: American State Elections, Early Voting, Voter Access

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Adrian Tawfik

Democracy Chronicles has been run by Founder and Editor-in-Chief Adrian Tawfik since 2011. He received a B.A. from New School University and is based in New York City where he built DC from the ground up. See Adrian's Opinion Column for a sampling of Adrian's personal views and browse his hundreds of original political memes. Also take a look at the rest of our international team of authors.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Impatient Federal Government Asks Ninth Circuit to Rule in California Ballot Case by Saturday; Ninth Circuit Orders Responses to Be Filed by that Time [Corrected headline]
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Taking the bait
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 5 hours ago
  • Could the election in Texas be a multi-party contest, in disguise?
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • “Musk breaks donor record as the ultrarich pour $2.7 billion into the midterms”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago
  • In California Voting Case, Judge Carter Reiterates Oct. 27 Hearing Date on TRO, Takes DOJ to Task for Demanding a Ruling by October 22 After Its Earlier Request for a Ruling by November 3
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 8 hours ago