Those of us in Oregon need to vote against the “top two primary” election because it continues to use single-mark ballots, which are the source of the problem. The idea of an “open” primary is a nice idea, but primary elections — of either kind — need to use a better kind of ballot.
Instead of single-mark ballots, if the proposed law were written to use a simple “approval” ballot, where a voter can mark more than one candidate, then I would happily support a “top two primary,” because that would give us much fairer results. Alas, the proposed law refers to getting the “most votes,” and this kind of primitive election method — which is the same one we have now — is likely to cause wild outcomes. Worse, money will be used to make those wild outcomes likely.
For example, if there are two Republicans and two Democrats in the race, wealthy conservatives can quietly give money to support two additional Democratic candidates. Then vote splitting among the Democratic candidates will cause both of the Republican candidates to win! In other words, the runoff election would be between two Republican candidates just because there were “too many” Democratic candidates in the primary election.
If this sounds bizarre, consider that the whole reason we now have primary elections is that our long-time use of single-mark ballots was causing “general” elections to be won by whichever political party had fewer candidates. The original purpose of primary elections was to ensure that each political party had only one candidate in the general election, and then vote splitting was less likely to happen.
If Oregon’s top two primary proposal passes, it does offer one advantage. Soon the unfairness of vote splitting will become more obvious, and then we can finally focus attention on using better ballots and better counting methods.
But in the meantime this proposed law would make elections much less fair, not more fair.
Please vote against it.
Also see the VoteFair Ranking Service, an advanced method of voting created by Richard Fobes!
See http://saveoregonsdemocracy.org for more information about Measure 90.
Thank you Dan for these additional reasons to vote against the “top two primary.”
For convenience, here is a quote, from “The Olympia Report” that appears on that website:
“… In California, which switched to a top-two primary system in 2011, the Republican Party has responded by voting to adopt a pre-primary process through which one candidate is identified [as] the official party candidate on all party mailings and, more importantly, given access to party funding and other resources.”
Another point made at that website is that candidates from third political parties do not win:
“With top two primaries in Washington and California, no minor party nor non-affiliated candidate has qualified for the general election for a statewide office. None.”
Alas, apparently nobody bothered to “do the math” regarding “top two primaries.” Oregon voters have the opportunity to not make the same mistake.