• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Our Anemic Democracy

by Dedre Atsey - November 13, 2012

Facebook12TweetLinkedInPinShares12

Anemic democracy voting

by Dedre Atsey

People have generally similar aspirations. Out of instinct for self-preservation, individuals innately strive to achieve their potential and to fruitfully reproduce. In a social structure that facilitates the recognition of how similar people are to one another—and how closely their goals and aspirations align—people would be in general agreement with one another about how to achieve their aims and whom to vote for to represent their interests.

This society of mutual recognition of interests and mutual aid requires a structure where people are allowed and encouraged to communicate their grievances and concerns with each other. However our social structure is such where those in power prefer to maintain their power by having the people divided and set against one another. Whether people are divided over Democrat versus Republican, rap culture versus rock ‘n’ roll culture, or one football team versus another—any imaginable topic is used to keep the population distracted from the wool being pulling over our collective eyes. Those in power would prefer to have people not recognize their common interests.

Becoming Anemic Democracy

This strategy for population control has been in use ever since humans had documented societies but especially over the last forty years have we had the technological and scientific means to really segregate people from one another. More recently, power has the means available to earnestly prevent people from attaining and sustaining meaningful relationships and communication with one another, thereby forsaking their own individual and collective interests.

Those in power with the use of short-sighted, immoral, and ignorant scientists and other lackeys have developed scientific approaches to social control. The general population is not taught in school or from television the various fields of science dedicated to the social control of a population. The means of manipulating public perception and controlling attitudes has been developed into a science. A wide spectrum of tactics for distracting, dividing, and controlling the population is employed, ranging from simple and transparent tactics, to complex psychological manipulation, meant to cover for and pacify edge cases, free-thinkers, and resisters.

This election—when Obama faced off against Romney—the perception of one human candidate being different from and up against another human candidate, is not an actual election between two human candidates with their own agendas and ideas and images for America. Instead of an election, what we have is a cynical branch of science with controlled—and truly catastrophic—results. 
Why is it that neither candidate from the two acceptable parties poses any questions about our objectively fundamentally wrong approaches to foreign wars and our major domestic policies regarding finance, healthcare, housing, drug-war, energy, etc.? We have spent trillions of dollars on war and our veterans are coming home with higher rates of mental illness than in any previous wars. Murdering civilians for the benefit of robber barons is detrimental to one’s mental well-being.

The type of nationalized health care available in any other first world country is smeared as a public option. We virtually do not have any publicly funded media—we now only have privatized media that is out for their own short-term financial interests. We are currently on a dire and despotic trajectory as a country, so much that in my observation, third-party presidential debates are actually gaining a little bit of steam this year because of the sheer number of people affected by our absurd political situation. By watching the third-party debates, one thing that will stand out is the seriousness with which these actual human candidates approach the pressing issues that we have at hand in comparison with how tragically comically these same topics are discussed in our so-called mainstream debates.

Why is it that both candidates from the two acceptable parties agree on absolutely everything? Why is it that the trivial disagreements that they do have and that take the shape merely in style and wording are what the major media organizations report on and relentlessly amplify as though they are fundamental disagreements? The media uses various primitive—as well as advanced—trickery techniques to shape the acceptable scope and spectrum of debate.

The differences between the two candidates are so asinine and trivial it is simply embarrassing to witness the electorate allow the media to convince them that there is any meaningful difference between the two candidates. 
To anybody with the courage, moral fortitude, and context of history enough to look outside of the so-called mainstream sources for information have the answers to the questions posed above. The questions posed above and the answers to them should be taught in elementary school in order to stop repeating these missteps in history.

The two major and acceptable parties are actually one party: It is the party of money and insatiable power. There is a lot of money and there are many people involved in the perpetuation of our charade of a political process. This major effort of having the two candidates debate one another and release commercials about one another, and of having these extravagant political campaigns, exists to provide a side-show meant to distract the casual observer from what is really going on and this major effort of staging these elections and the associated commentary is meant to convince the casual observer to remain casual and to become invested—and to then themselves perpetuate a dishonest, information-suppressing, relentlessly brutal system.

The casual and historically illiterate observer is vested into a system and narrative that is conjured up to make enough sense to be believable. We are told embarrassingly vapid stories about something called a free market and how there is something called trickle-down economics, and that there are these job creators that we absolutely need to devote all our money and time to. We are presented with tales of all these terrorists whom we have to fight against because they hate our freedom.

 

The casual observer is convinced to believe that what is available as a choice in our elections is actually a choice and not a charade. The casual observer and voter allows him or herself to believe that being a responsible citizen is comprised of getting up in the morning to go to work, collect their paycheck and raise their family, and that their participation in the democratic process of the most powerful, violent, and feared empire the world has ever seen consists of soaking up every four years some Koch/Coke/Exxon/Goldman Sachs/Americans For Prosperity/etc. sponsored infomercials and then vote for one or another representative of power and money.

The casual observer and voter is molded to believe that they have nothing more important to talk about with their friends, coworkers, and relatives than the local football game. The casual observer is not taught in school or by television that sports has been used as an explicit tool for political and social control since before Roman times. The casual observer does not dare to look outside of the mainstream even on issues that they feel the mainstream misinforms them on. The lie is repeated to the casual observer intensely enough to convince them to invalidate their own concerns about social security being cut and privatized, about endless war in a half dozen countries to fight terrorists we ourselves train and fund, etc.

Even if the casual observer knows what is happening is problematic, the media has such a stranglehold on acceptable analysis and acceptable spectrum for our policies that the casual observer does not dare to make known their disagreement with what they see in the mainstream. The casual observer is loaded with perceived and real intimidations to voice and act on their opinion. The casual observer is loaded with obligations to family and work. “Alternatives” to the casual observer is a dirty word. The casual observer votes for one of the two major parties.

Why the media is so involved in dictating our policies and has such control over our political system should be old-hat knowledge to anyone that pays any more than only casual attention. Anyone who goes beyond obediently observing casually knows that our media companies, our CNNs, our FOXs, our MSNBCs are precisely the same companies or subsidiaries of companies that donate to and control our political process.

Any citizen has a moral obligation to ask themselves some specific questions. Why is it that we are engaged in these insane wars to catch terrorists in all of these Middle Eastern countries? These are one-sided wars of aggression deemed illegal by the United Nations. We are slaughtering entire families with experimental high-tech gadgetry. This is costing us trillions of dollars and, far more importantly, every moment these wars and occupations are allowed to continue, they costing us our very own morality as individuals.

The media companies that issue ridiculous purple terrorist alerts are the very same companies or subsidiaries of companies that built and sold the weapons used to annihilate Iraq. The casual observer has a moral obligation to question whether it is in our best interest as a society to allow for our media companies to be the very same entities that arm our military. The detachment from the reality of our current political situation in the mainstream commentary really is astounding.

Astounding also should be the amount of unimaginable damage and suffering we allow our political leaders to inflict on the world and ourselves. The fact that the people in these Middle Eastern countries show enough restraint to not retaliate against our completely immoral, illegal provocative wars of absurd aggression is a testament to the patience and tolerance of these people. We can ask ourselves just how pleased and welcoming we would be should a country more rich and dangerous than our own invaded us, bombed our cities, raped our mothers and sisters, and installed a puppet government by holding elections even more farcical than our current ones.

Why is it that in response to our ridiculous predictable manufactured economic crisis of 2008—in which dishonest speculators personally made billions a year directly off of the suffering of others—instead of correcting the problem by trying and jailing dishonest and immoral speculators (such as those involved in the sub-prime mortgage shenanigans), we instead penalized some companies with million-dollar slaps on the wrist? An individual named John Paulson pocketed $5 billion in 2010 from the direct result of people losing their homes—that’s an average of $2.5 million per hour in a 40-hour work-week. We need to review our values and question what makes for a decent society. To not be in a state of persistent rage over such permitted injustices is to be woefully uninformed. People need to seriously discuss what virtues ought to be valued and what qualities and actions ought to be penalized.

We need to ask why we are allowing all of these conglomerated corporations to race everyone to the bottom by shipping our jobs overseas, and making our goods in China instead of making our goods here. Where is the leadership to recognize that shipping raw materials to China to make products to be exported back to be sold here a very bad idea and in many ways illogical?

Our mainstream has no tolerance for anything or anyone advocating for people to realize their capability to identify with anything beyond vacuous fashion. From infancy we are trained by any number of entities—toy companies to our misinformed and ignorant teachers—to not dig beyond the surface.

George W. Bush famously quipped that Americans should “go out and shop” as a resolution to our major economic problems. The leadership required to reverse our pervasive and perverse regression is not be found within the two major parties. The two parties have by now discredited themselves enough that scarcely anyone that identifies with them in any way should be taken at all seriously.
To escape from further catastrophe, ideally, Obama and Romney would be tried for treason by a jury. With anything resembling an informed jury, the two would surely be found guilty of treason and condemned to the harsh penalties reserved for those guilty of treason. Next would be charged the Supreme Court Justices, past presidents, and most of the House and Senate for the same.

An honest resolution to our political and moral crises would include a process by which the lackeys in current leadership positions, those most responsible for the perpetuation of our broken and regressive mainstream system of disinformation, exploitation, and short-term profit maximization, would lose their wealth and privileges. These lackeys with no skills outside of lying and brown-nosing will find rewarding work in the difficult labor involved in repairing our debilitated cities, infrastructure, and people.

This article is meant to be a very broad and general overview of our current political situation. I am not in any way an expert on any of these topics, but I am fortunate enough to have reading comprehension and I have not vested myself into the current political system enough to believe the obvious omnipresent lies present in our mainstream discussion. I did not cite specific sources for my claims, but nothing written here should be at all controversial.

Below is a selection of authors for further reading on topics that have been touched upon in this article. Each of the broadly categorized authors listed below have extraordinary and impeccable credentials and arguments against various aspects of our current power structure, which is precisely why they are almost without exception shut out of our mainstream discussion. My primary interests are our most immoral acts that our country is involved in, our wars, and the social control required to sustain them.

Sources

  • Media: Neil Postman, Marshall McLuhan, Amy Goodman, Robert McChesney, Laura Flanders, David Barsamian, André Schiffrin, Jeff Cohen.
  • Foreign Policy: Tariq Ali, Robert Fisk, Chalmers Johnson, Jeremy Scahill, Chris Hedges, Alexander Cockburn, Patrick Cockburn, Norman Finkelstein, John Pilger, Andrew Bacevich.
  • Our Economy: Matt Taibbi, Michael Perelman, Michael Hudson, Joseph Stiglitz, Dean Baker.
  • Social Control: Bill Moyers, Juliet Schor, Dave Zirin, Michael Parenti, Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Adam Curtis, Joseph Turow, Susan Linn.
  • Miscellaneous: Glenn Greenwald, Gore Vidal, Ralph Nader, Howard Zinn, Michael Pollan, Greg Palast, Seymour Hersh, Barbara Ehrenreich, John Taylor Gatto, John Nichols.
Facebook12TweetLinkedInPinShares12

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American Corruption, Noam Chomsky, Socialism and Labor

About Dedre Atsey

Dedre Atsey lives in Texas where he also writes for Democracy Chronicles. Take a look at his most recent posts about democracy! Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Ossipoff says

    November 14, 2012 at 11:04 pm

    Well said.

    This author thoroughly expresses and describes the motivation, mechanism and disastrous results of the sorry scam that I had only sketched a little of the electoral/political aspect of.

    Reply
    • Adrian Tawfik says

      November 15, 2012 at 11:17 am

      Thanks for writing this article. I think there are many people who share your views just like Mr. Ossipoff. I am not in the same camp I think on the other hand. The US is a country that has its problems but to call it an empire is going to far and missing the fact that there does exist a democracy in this country even if the election system is so full of flaws. The last 30 or so years has seen an undeniable backsliding in democracy but to claim that they are totally fraudulent is going to far. Federal, state and local elections for 230 years is nothing to scoff at given the nature of the world outside our borders. America’s wars are another topic but I am a true believer that a country that has real elections, in the modern sense of the word, will find better leadership and compared to dictatorship avoid war. This may seem ridiculous given America’s circumstances today but take a different democratic country like Switzerland, India or Brazil and I think history shows that facing elections has mollified their country’s foreign policy as leaders seek trade and compromise. How else could the unification of 20+ European countries still be on the table at this very moment? I expect the same pacification of foreign policy to happen to Tunisia, Libya and Egypt if their election systems survive. The lack of democracy has created violence across the Arab world in daily life but democracy is the way out. Democracies are generally more inward focused and hopefully these countries will confirm an election system is paramount to creating effective leadership. Even at the depths of this financial crisis, the American people are wealthier, safer and freer than human beings have been ever in history. But our leadership started falling apart when we started the erosion in our election systems in the 1970s. Democratic reform in the US is possible (given that we don’t live in a dictatorship) and once these reforms bring us back to a fair election system, like those of Canada or Australia, we will have better political leadership. Do not expect a utopia in your lifetime and you might see that the democratic system of government is the worst system of government there is, except for anything else the world has ever tried.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Our Anemic Democracy

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

A New Approach To Breaking Our Media Silos

By Jenna Spinelle August 12, 2022

It’s no secret that there’s a partisan divide in the media, but thus far, solutions to bridge that divide have been few and far between.

Carmel’s Cautionary Tale for Post-Roe America

By Joe Mathews August 10, 2022

The lesson is about… the human horrors of letting judges, or anyone else, determine our rights on the basis of history – especially when history omits so much.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

New Tech Helps Citizens Audit The Vote

By Steve Schneider August 9, 2022

Rebuilding trust in our democracy would require high-quality verification in the form of audits that will stand up in the court of public opinion.

2022: Year Of Radical Change For Camp Lejeune Justice

By Andrew Straw August 4, 2022

Indiana has been a purple state dominated and oppressed by Republicans who stack every deck in their own favor, all three branches.

Here At The Crossroads, To Lead Or Be Led

By Jack Jones August 1, 2022

We will only have a chance to save our imperiled democracy if we work to reverse discriminatory laws like Citizens United.

Laboratories Against Democracy

By Jenna Spinelle July 25, 2022

Jake Grumbach’s book “Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics” is out now from Princeton University Press.

Mass Shootings: Time To Ramp Up Citizen Action

By Jack Jones July 20, 2022

Those controlling the levers of power need to be confronted on these issues and made uncomfortable enough so that they can act.

Harnessing The Power Of “We The People” On Independence Day

By Jenna Spinelle July 3, 2022

Democracy does not have a singular definition, which is one of the things that makes it so interesting to me — and undoubtedly to many of you.

Florida Doesn’t Need a Speech Czar

By Steve Schneider June 28, 2022

Full disclosure: I’m a liberal Democrat. So, I won’t be sending in my vote-by-mail ballot for Ron DeSantis in November. Nor will I vote for him in 2024.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

New Quarter Will Honor Activist Who Fought For Women’s Voting

July 28, 2022

A Latina suffragette and one of New Mexico’s first female officials during the 20th century will have her image stamped on the US quarter.

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

Magnum Photographers Challenged To Picture Swiss Democracy

July 6, 2022

Magnum photographers accustomed to exploring crisis regions have been challenged to capture the quiet operation of Swiss democracy.

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

India: Why Are Punjab Political Singers Under Attack?

June 8, 2022

The murder of Sidhu Moose Wala has brought attention to the link between Punjabi music and India’s cross-border criminal networks.

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

University Educated Less Likely To Endorse Authoritarianism

June 4, 2022

Higher education is now seen as a new political cleavage, with level of education increasingly important in describing political attitudes.

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

From Cake To Volunteers, Welcome To Australia’s Democracy Day

May 25, 2022

The atmosphere in the interstate polling booth in Sydney’s inner east resembled that of an emergency room waiting for a donor organ.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy