• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / A Review of the Controversial New WWII book: The Phoney Victory

A Review of the Controversial New WWII book: The Phoney Victory

October 15, 2018 by Dr Nicolas Lewkowicz, PhD, FRHistS Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPin2TweetShares2
New WWII book: The Phoney Victory
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt, and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin meet at Yalta in February 1945 – Image link

A new book, The Phoney Victory, written by Peter Hitchens, presents the idea that the decision of the British government to declare war against Germany in September 1939 was the wrong one, at least when it comes to its timing. Hitchens’ analysis is strengthened by the idea that the “victory” over Germany in 1945 left the country in a state of economic bankruptcy. Is he right?

Hitchens’ Basic Idea

By 1945, the United Kingdom had many of the characteristics of a defeated nation, due to the significant human and material resources that were committed to the fight against the Axis. World War Two is framed within the narrative of the “Good War” against a terrible enemy. However, in Hitchens’ opinion, the declaration of war prompted the Nazi regime to engage in the policy of extermination in the countries that it conquered after 1939.

Hitchens questions whether the country was prepared to fight a war against Germany in 1939. He also states that there is no conclusive evidence that Germany was planning to invade the United Kingdom in 1940. Furthermore, Hitchens proceeds to demystify a number of commonly held assumptions regarding the British participation in World War Two. The author argues that the United Kingdom was not forced into war by Nazi Germany. At the same time, Hitchens rightly states that Poland was not a “bastion of democracy,” as it was governed by an authoritarian and anti-Semitic regime.

This state of affairs does not given credence to the idea that the United Kingdom was fighting for democracy in Europe. The United Kingdom, according to Hitchens, did not enter the war in order to save the Jews. Chamberlain was not an appeaser, as seen in the increase in military expenditure under his tenure. Hitchens also seeks to disprove the idea of “standalone” Britain and the “special relationship” with the United States.

These arguments are used to link the participation of the United Kingdom in World War Two to the country’s geopolitical decline in the aftermath of the conflagration. World War Two paved the way for further European integration, described by Hitchens as “the continuation of Germany by other means” and the disintegration of the old social order in the United Kingdom.

A Critique

Peter Hitchens is, by his own admission, a “scribbler” and not a historian. He omits to broach the geopolitical implications that could have emerged from not declaring war against Nazi Germany in 1939. Giving Nazi Germany a free hand in continental Europe would have meant a larger demotion of the geopolitical position of the United Kingdom than the one that the country suffered as a result of the outcome of World War Two.

The idea of European integration as “the continuation of Germany” proposed by Hitchens is in line with the sense of ontological separation vis-à-vis the idea of Europe that permeates the scholarly and non-scholarly treatment of World War Two in the United Kingdom. The notion of European integration (with the European Union as the embodiment of that idea) is seen by Hitchens as something of a sinister nature.

However, the outcome of World War Two created the end of the internal balance of power in Western Europe, which is now being threatened, to a certain extent, by the exiting of the United Kingdom from the European Union. The period of peace and prosperity that emerged from the ashes of World War Two was due to the participation of the United Kingdom in World War Two, which prompted the reformation of the political culture in Germany and the demarcation of its geopolitical claims of Germany to the commercial realm.

There is evidence that suggests that United Kingdom (and France, for that matter) could have prevented the onset of World War Two by halting Hitler’s expansionist drive in 1938. Both countries had considerable military superiority over Germany at that time and would have been able to liaise with opposition elements within that country in order to bring down Hitler.

My conclusion

The Phoney Victory raises some interesting propositions regarding the participation of the United Kingdom in World War Two. However, it fails to consider the alternative geopolitical outcome that would have been generated by the lack of willingness to fight Hitler in 1939: an international order and commercial system dictated by the needs and interests of the Axis powers and the retreat of the idea of freedom and democracy as subjects of international relations.

You can click here to find the book “The Phoney Victory: The World War II Illusion” directly at its publisher’s website, I.B.Tauris.

FacebookLinkedInPin2TweetShares2

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election History, England, Europe, Germany

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Dr Nicolas Lewkowicz, PhD, FRHistS

Dr Nicolas Lewkowicz, PhD, FRHistS writes for Democracy Chronicles from Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is a Research Professor at University of New Mexico and a Fellow at Royal Historical Society.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • Kazakhstan publishes ‘foreign agent’ register...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 5 hours ago
  • Three Ethiopian journalists beaten and detain...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 hours ago
  • CPJ calls for accountability after Chilean jo...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 hours ago
  • Two Prague-based Russian journalists threaten...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 10 hours ago
  • “Constitution Day conversation with Jamie Ras...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 11 hours ago