• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Can Polarized Politics Be Reduced Through Two Simple Words?

Can Polarized Politics Be Reduced Through Two Simple Words?

October 19, 2013 by George Sanders 1 Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Vote for Polarized Politics Approval Voting

by George Sanders

Can Polarized Politics be reduced through two simple words?

George Washington warned us about “the alternate domination of one faction over another” [polarized politics] in his Farewell address over 200 years ago. But couldn’t polarized politics be seriously mitigated simply by officially adding just two more words to our ballot instructions?:

Instead of “Vote for one,” our ballot instructions can read, “Vote for one or more.” Simply called “Approval Voting,” this means that:
Approval Voting Example Polarized Politics

  1. Similar candidates (and parties) for an office will no longer spoil each others’ chances by having their vote-totals split amongst them,
  2. Expensive primaries no longer needed to eliminate party spoilers,
  3. Same election procedure and ballots (no added costs)–simply count all the approval votes,
  4. More candidates will run and owe their allegiance directly to US!

And with all the extra competition, incumbents will just have to do a better job, big money will have less influence to buy politicians, gerrymandering will be ineffective, lobbyists would be less influential, pre-election polls will be less self fulfilling, elections will be less vitriolic, and more people will vote and have more faith in their elected officials.

And our elected officials would now be able to legislate faster and better using Approval Voting in their procedures to select the most-approved parts of lots of bills on the same subject, quickly putting forth legislation that will already be the most pre-approved and without any wasteful pork-barrel projects.

Best of all, the winning candidate will have the broadest overall support of the electorate–instead of sometimes being just some polarizing bare-majority winner, and We the People will finally understand that “We’re all in this together”!

So, what are the disadvantages for US VOTERS having more choices rather than just one?

Answer: None.

George Sanders

George@VotingInSanity.org

@VotingInSanity

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election Methods, Founding Fathers, Political Lobbying, Polling, Redistricting, Third Party

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About George Sanders

George Sanders writes for Democracy Chronicles from New York. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Adrian Tawfik says

    October 19, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    It’s a very good argument for Approval. It seems to have a lot of support among election method people. Good article.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • Belarusian authorities detain at least two Ra...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 1 hour ago
  • “Small segment of voters will wield outsize p...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “Exclusive: Pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 2 hours ago
  • “Appeals Court Upholds, but Narrows, Gag Orde...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 3 hours ago
  • Indispensable Resource from Federal Judicial...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 hours ago