• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | DC AUTHORS | Arizona Can Make its Money Politics More Transparent

Arizona Can Make its Money Politics More Transparent

December 12, 2017 by Thomas Manning Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Make its Money Politics More Transparent

Former Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard has begun an effort to try and make monetary donations more transparent in political campaigns. Also known as “dark money,” the issue has been raised by numerous candidates over the past previous election cycles, mainly by Democrats, who see it as immoral to take money from special interest groups and corporations.

“We spent the time in between broadening the base, not too many people were involved in that petition effort,” Goddard said of the new attempt to have the petition on the ballot by the 2018 election. Goddard was referring to efforts made by past legislative sessions to sign bills that would require candidates to show where their donations come from in a more transparent fashion.

To get the “Stop Political Dirty Money Amendment,” on the ballot for the 2018 election, Goddard and his allies need over 2,500 signatures.

However, despite all the momentum the Democrats believe they have in getting it to be on the ballot, there are those, including the Governor who believe that such an amendment will curtail free speech.  “I’ve always been a fan of more transparency, but I think people have a First Amendment right as to participate and not to be bullied,” Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey said.

Republicans and Democrats differ vastly on the role of money in politics, with many Democrats opposing the right to monetary political donations saying that it corrupts the process and say that the public should have a right to know where the money of people who are donating it comes from.

The Citizens United decision also polarized the two sides. In January of 2010, the United States Supreme Court ruled five to four that the United States Government cannot restrict monetary donations to political candidates. The Democrats have been strongly opposed to the ruling since 2010 and have made the supreme court case a campaign issue.

The ballot initiative must be passed by July 5, to get on the November 2018 ballot.

“It’s a hard job, but I think it’s possible, or I wouldn’t be doing it,” Goddard continued.

The last time Arizona had any bills signed that related to money in politics, was in March 2016. In Senate bill 1516, the Governor signed a law that loosened the regulations revolving around money in political campaigns.

“Laws that relate to free speech should not be so complicated that everyday Arizonans willing to participate in public service have to hire lawyers and accountants to get involved,” Ducey said in March 2016 after signing the bill into law.

Like almost every topic in American society, the bill was debated bitterly in Arizona’s House and Senate. However, unlike many of the partisan topics, there was a split in voting, where many Republicans and Democrats voted both for and against the legislation.

“It quashes participation for anyone who else doesn’t have the price of admission,” Arizona Senator, Steve Farley (D-Tucson), said following the passage of the bill. Democrats argue that the bill favors the billionaires over the average Arizonan.

Ultimately, people shouldn’t have to worry about being bullied for making political donations to a candidate they chose, but on the other hand there should be a counter balance to be able to see where monetary donations to political candidates come from. Transparency is the only way to know what is influencing the decision making process in America.

Links to sources:

  1. Azfamily.com – https://www.azfamily.com/story/36957098/initiative-seeks-disclosure-of-dark-money-donors
  2. kjzz.com – https://kjzz.org/content/573275/arizona-voters-could-see-stop-dirty-money-amendment-2018-ballot
  3. AzCentral.com – https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2016/03/31/arizona-gov-doug-ducey-signs-darkmoney-bill/82492558/
FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American State Elections, Election Transparency, Journalism and Free Speech, Money Politics

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Thomas Manning

Thomas Manning writes for Democracy Chronicles from New York City and is a key part of our increasing coverage of democracy news. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 7 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 7 months ago