• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / The Mirage Of Presidential Election In Cameroon

The Mirage Of Presidential Election In Cameroon

August 29, 2018 by Kenral Simo 2 Comments

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
The Mirage Of Presidential Election In Cameroon In October 2018
Assistant Secretary Jendayi E. Frazer, President Paul Biya of Cameroon, and U.S. Ambassador R. Niels Marquardt at the inauguration of the new U.S. Embassy to Cameroon, 16 February 2006.

2018 is a year for general elections in Cameroon. The coming elections include a presidential election that is more than likely to be a complete mirage, a staged-managed invention to shore up the international reputation of the longtime incumbent, Paul Biya, who has ruled with an iron fist since 1982. His victory in the rigged contest is not in doubt.

This is arguably as a result of the nature of Cameroon’s undemocratic politics, the corruption of the electoral machine, voter apathy and pushing through with elections despite deep political crisis in the English-speaking regions of the mostly French-speaking west African country.

In March 2018, Senatorial elections were held in which President Paul Biya’s Cameroon People Democratic Movement (CPDM) party won 63 out of 70 elected seats. Ni John Fru Ndi’s chief opposition party, the Social Democratic Front (SDF) obtained only 7 seats, down from 14. The rest of the 30 seats were filled by Presidential appointment as is required by what prevails as law in the country.

Then, on 13 June 2018, Biya wrote a letter to the Senate President and to the National Assembly President asking them to consult their various bureaus on his proposed postponement of the legislative and municipal elections by one year starting from October 2018.

Biya argued that organising the municipal and legislative elections together with the presidential election would be too cumbersome. The Government has also posited that the insecurity in the Anglophone regions of the country and in the Far North Region warranted the postponement.

Considering that the Parliament, in which the CPDM has the majority, rarely ever opposes Biya’s bills, it is obvious that Parliament eventually did as Biya has “proposed”.

Since the return of multi-party politics in Cameroon in the early 1990s, the CPDM has used all sorts of new strategies to consolidate its grip over the executive, legislative and judiciary. The gradual decline in opposition numbers in Parliament has effectively reinforced one-party dominance.

The atomised opposition has thus been unable to unite to constitute a single front to challenge Biya. Even if it did, it would only pose very minimal threat to Biya’s continued rule since the regime’s control of the election administration and its repression of political freedoms ensures the status quo. Finding no other way forward, a group of “opposition” parties, however headed by doubtful opposition figures, has coalesced to support the candidacy of Paul Biya. One begins to wonder if these are political parties or mere associations supporting Biya.

Added to the move by these associations to throw their support to Biya, greatly weakening the opposition, Biya has once again secured a de facto win even before voting begins. Growing voter apathy and the worsening armed separatist conflict in the Anglophone regions (regions concomitant with the former British Southern Cameroons) will go a long way to give Biya an easy landslide victory in elections that are now clearly staged managed by the CPDM-run Elections Cameroon (ELECAM).

Biya and his CPDM have tightened their grip over all aspects of social, economic and political life. His cronies have also been working hard to eliminate any traces of local government so that any form of protest in the upcoming Presidential elections will be inconsequential. The army will be unleashed to repress any such attempts in the most violent of ways. Even if there are no votes at all in the English-speaking regions, it will not change the fact that Biya will secure his win.

However, all is not lost. Like for all African States, true democracy remains the primary prescription for Cameroon’s political woes. Only time stands in its way.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Africa, Cameroon, Dictatorships

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Kenral Simo

Kenral Simo writes for Democracy Chronicles from Cameroon. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. David Anderson says

    September 2, 2018 at 11:39 am

    President Paul is happy in his Swiss hotel.. where’s the problem? (sarcasm alert there)
    We can see a similar situation across the bay in Equatorial Guinea.
    Good article.David

    Reply
  2. David Anderson says

    September 2, 2018 at 11:27 pm

    Interesting piece. As you kind of imply – more worrying than Paul B’s tenure is what comes after it?
    With a little luck he’ll be found floating at the bottom of the hotel pool in Switzerland. But like with the criminal Nguema next door in Equatorial Guinea, the central question has to be: What’s next?
    With both of these “leader” – criminals…. so little has been said about how the best way to proceed after their (imminent, both are very old) demise.
    Thx for your article.
    D

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • The Atlantic and the NYT Open the Week with M...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 1 hour ago
  • “In win for Cooper and Democrats, NC judges b...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago
  • Watch Archived Video of My Conversation with...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago
  • “Trump attempts to spin anti-democracy, autho...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago
  • Thanks to Rick Pildes for Blogging Last Week
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago