• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / Democracy in America / Ranked Voting’s Rare But Real Mathematical Flaws

Ranked Voting’s Rare But Real Mathematical Flaws

May 7, 2023 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Ranked Voting's Rare But Real Mathematical FlawsThis article by David McCune and Adam Graham-Squire is published by ProMarket. Here is an extract:

Should more cities and states adopt ranked choice voting (RCV) for municipal and state elections? Is RCV a “good” way to select election winners? These questions are not easily resolved, as the answer depends on what one wants from a voting method and whether a method’s benefits outweigh its downsides (all voting methods seemingly have downsides). Furthermore, the study of how best to select election winners is decidedly interdisciplinary, involving tools from political science, economics, mathematics, and psychology, among others. As mathematicians, we approach these questions by examining how frequently RCV’s deficiencies manifest in actual elections, where we focus on deficiencies which have historically been of interest in the mathematically oriented social choice literature.

How does RCV work? Voters cast a preference ballot where they rank candidates from first to last. If a candidate receives a majority of first-place preferences, that candidate is declared the winner. Otherwise, the voting process eliminates the candidate with the fewest first-place votes. Ballots that ranked the eliminated candidate first are then reallocated to the candidates they ranked second (or, if the candidate ranked second has previously been eliminated, are reallocated to the third candidate, etc.). The process continues in this fashion until a candidate has earned a majority of the remaining votes. RCV is commonly referred to as “instant runoff voting” because it uses preference ballots to instantaneously mimic the outcomes of potential future runoff elections, thereby saving the jurisdiction the cost and time of holding such runoffs.

To illustrate this process, consider the table below, which contains the preference ballot information for the August 2022 Special Election for the U.S. House in Alaska. This election was the first ranked choice election for state or federal office in the state. Neglecting write-in candidates, this election contained three candidates: Republicans Nick Begich and Sarah Palin and Democrat Mary Peltola.

Read the full article here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: Election Methods

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

american democracy around the web

  • “Trump electors: ‘fake’ or ‘contingent’?”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • Larry Lessig on Trump Disqualification: “A Te...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • Rosalind Dixon: “Politics as Markets: Here an...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • “Biden’s campaign set to counterpunch on misi...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • “North Carolina May Increase Odds of Gridlock...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago