• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | DC AUTHORS | On Religion, Authoritarianism and Technology

On Religion, Authoritarianism and Technology

January 19, 2026 by Jenny Oak Tree 1 Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Religion, Authoritarianism and TechnologyI don’t want this to be an incendiary piece where I condemn religion, but it seems that political Islam, Christian Nationalism, and right-wing Zionism are part and parcel of a framework of religious fundamentalism derailing good governance. Bernard Lewis is famous for his writings asserting that Islam is incompatible with democracy and has very few examples of democratic processes in its history, never mind that Ataturk reconfigured Turkey into a beacon of democracy until Erdogan took it to an authoritative space.

We may be living in a world with many truths. The first one is the three Abrahamic religions, which have played an essential role in world history, are being used to justify extremist ideas about gender, race, state administration, and government in an effort to hold power and shape public opinion throughout the world. We see this in Iran, where the Islamic Republic, though its name claims for itself some democratic legitimacy, is ruled by a twelve person Guardian Council who vets all Presidents and laws to be in line with the Islamic Republic’s philosophy on political Islam. To a certain degree, religion builds community and purpose, but it can also be used to justify oppression, as we’ve seen in Iran, as protestors fight for their right to democracy and are killed without any rhyme or reason for the crime of demanding freedom and democracy.

We can say that authoritarianism, much like the one that predated the rise of Hitler, is reappearing, with as much vigor as it did during Hitler’s chancellorship. In understanding Hitler’s ascent to German Chancellor, there are many parallels to what has gone on in Trump’s America. Like Hitler, Trump was accused of a federal crime and convicted and then served no sentence, which in turn made him more popular with his base. In contrast, Hitler was sentenced to five years but spent about eight or nine months in jail writing the myths of Mein Kempf. Hitler told many lies about his belonging to certain parties, that have been widely discredited, further bolstering his credentials to Germans. In a way, the combination of propaganda and indoctrination the Nazis used on their people may indeed be what our bespoken realities are spoon-feeding us now as we fall deeper into the abyss of religious fundamentalism and authoritarianism.

You may ask, how do people believe what amount to lies? Renee DiResta writes in her book, “Invisible Rulers: The People who Turn Lies into Reality”, that once a lie goes viral, it is truth. Efforts to dispel the lie leave less of a viral imprint. We are basically a populace at the mercy of humanity’s impulse to lie and create outrage. We are seeing the seeds of years of misinformation, growth of anti-democratic forces, social media as a tool for deception and self-aggrandization grow to their full potential. This has led to this period in our history, which doesn’t yet have a name, which is a time of incredible unrest, authoritarianism, and rise of religious fundamentalism coopting state administration.

I read history to acknowledge that there are times of great unrest throughout modern history, and we are not unique and it does give us a kind of guidebook on what we should do. Reading through the experts and leaders in democracy, authoritarianism, social media’s impact on the populace, there’s a sense of urgency to our belief that we are fighting for the future of democracy as the powers that be see democracy as infringing on their capitalistic right to be rich. Only when the data social media and AI collect hinders the future of their companies, whether by the AI bubble bursting or increased pressure on private companies to act on misinformation and undemocratic trends on their social media networks, can we get to a point where maybe we can start to untangle all of the threads and begin to address the elephant in the room: Did Americans know when they voted for Trump that they were voting against democracy? If they didn’t, could they join our goal of banding together to preserve democracy?

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American Corruption, Journalism and Free Speech, Religion and Democracy, Social Media and Democracy

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Jenny Oak Tree

Jenny Oak Tree writes for Democracy Chronicles from the state of Alabama. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jack Jones says

    January 22, 2026 at 1:06 pm

    The powers that be see democracy as infringing on their capitalistic right to be rich. Great line! That is the issue. My heart won’t bleed for them, because they want it all. Every sector of life has regulations. The business community, should embrace theirs because when they only care about their right to be rich, people get hurt. It could be spoiled meat or bank regulations. Laws and regulation are there for a reason and usually the code, law or regulation came about after years of trial and error.. Many are set in place to promote business and address other civil concerns. I don’t want anarchy , just like I don’t like authoritarianism. Let the people decide what’s right, while leaning in to promote justice. There are too many lying talking heads out there. Sometimes I wonder if it centers around or more at home with the rich, Jack

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 months ago