• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | States Curbing the Revolving Door Between Government and Industry

States Curbing the Revolving Door Between Government and Industry

July 27, 2019 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

States Curbing the Revolving Door Between Government and Industry

From Common Cause

Three states in particular – Iowa, North Dakota and Maryland – have developed revolving door restrictions that effectively prevent former state officials from conducting any lobbying activity for a period of time after leaving public office – something the federal government should implement, a new Public Citizen analysis finds.

As “laboratories of democracy,” the experiences among the states in trying to slow the revolving door between government and industry offer lessons for the federal government.

The revolving door is a practice in which former public officials cash in on their government service by becoming lobbyists or strategic consultants after they leave government, then selling their inside connections and knowledge to corporate interests. This revolving door muddies whether public officials are representing the public interest or corporate interests.

Several states have determined that a one-year ban on lobbying by former public officials is far too short. At the very least, the “cooling-off’ period should be a full two-year legislative cycle so that turnover fades the former officials’ inside connections. Florida imposes a six-year cooling-off period.

More importantly, states like Iowa, North Dakota and Maryland prohibit former officials from conducting any “lobbying activity” for compensation during the cooling-off period, not just banning “lobbying contacts” during that period as is done at the federal level.

The worst states – Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Wyoming – have no restrictions, the analysis found.

See how other states manage the revolving door here.

The government-to-lobbyist revolving door is potentially corrupting. Public officials may be influenced by the implicit or explicit promise of a lucrative job in the private sector with an entity seeking a government contract or to shape public policy. In addition, public officials-turned-lobbyists have access to lawmakers that is not available to others – access they sell for a hefty price.

Federal restrictions on the revolving door are woefully inadequate. While former U.S. senators are subject to a two-year cooling-off period, members of the U.S. House of Representatives and most executive branch officials are subject only to a one-year ban.

Worse yet, all former federal public officials are prohibited only from making lobbying contacts during the cooling-off period. They can immediately join a lobbying firm and organize and direct a lobbying campaign; they just can’t pick up the telephone to contact their former colleagues.

A recent Public Citizen report that found 59% (26 of 44) of former members of the 115th Congress (2017-2019) who have found employment outside politics have gone through the revolving door and are conducting lobbying activities.

As several states have shown, an effective revolving door law should be more comprehensive than the narrow ban on lobbying contacts now prohibited under the cooling-off period at the federal level, and the cooling-off period needs to be longer than a single year.

Following the example of the “best” states, federal revolving door laws should be strengthened by:

· Extending all cooling-off periods to a minimum of two years or longer to allow the inside connections to sitting government officials to fade;

· Banning “lobbying activity” such as of conducting research, preparation, planning and supervision of a lobbying campaign as well as banning “lobbying contacts” during the cooling-off period; and

· Applying the ban on lobbying by former elected officials and very senior staff across the board to prohibit lobbying all agencies and both the legislative and executive branches of government during the cooling-off period.

“Public officials are supposed to serve the public interest of the American people,” said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen. “Increasingly, however, these public officials are leaving government service to work on behalf of private interests, as well as their own, as lobbyists or strategic consultants on behalf of lobbying campaigns for special interests. If we want government to work for us, we need to slow the revolving door.”

Read the full report here.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy in America Tagged With: American State Elections, Money Politics, Political Lobbying

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago