• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Obama Expands ‘Reasonable’ Search and Seizure to Cell Phones

by John Amaruso - May 4, 2014

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Search and Seizure

In the latest expansion of the national security state, the Obama administration has brought to the Supreme Court the argument that anyone’s cell phone is subject to search and seizure without first obtaining search warrants. The Supreme Court case Riley V. California is being decided upon under the context of the increasing government surveillance culture and has added yet another nail in the coffin of individual privacy.

The Justice Department lawyer Michael Dreeban has made the case that evidence found in suspect’s personal mobile devices have led to countless convictions that without would have seized to transpire, presumptuously claiming that this fact alone should bear right to law enforcement to conduct cell phone searches under any arrest related circumstance. Dreeban went on to say that if law enforcement had to go through the process of legally securing a warrant to scour through the contents of an arrested person’s phone, encryption could be enacted to thwart law enforcement’s ability to view the material.

Justice Kennedy echoed this sentiment, saying that criminals have utilized cell phones to facilitate crimes, making criminals “more dangerous, more sophisticated, more elusive with cellphones.”

Obama search and seizureThe issue of cell phone privacy comes in the age where over 90% of Americans own at least one cellphone according to a Pew Research Center, and admittedly millions of Americans store their sensitive and private information on their devices. Justice Elena Kagan said in the deliberations that “people carry their entire lives on their cellphones.”

The protection under the fourth amendment against unreasonable search and seizure by local and federal law enforcement seems to not be enough to slow down the Obama administration, which has expanded the notion of ‘reasonable’ search and seizure, and has adamantly defended the government’s right to do so under dubious circumstances.

Lawyer for David Riley, the plaintiff in this case, Jeffrey Fisher, said that the alteration in the notion of privacy first outlined in the constitution has “fundamentally… changed the nature of privacy that Americans fought for at the founding of the Republic.”

With billions of private e-mails, phone conversations and communications intercepted, cataloged and analyzed by the U.S. government on a daily basis, the transforming of local and federal law enforcement into impregnable ‘justice’ makers is the next step in the rapidly changing landscape of privacy, liberty, and security. Many would quote Benjamin Franklin’s infamous “liberty over security” line to sum up this trade off for an omnipotent government in return for the promised, although simply perceived feeling of peace and security- but for threat of being so cliche, the underscore of limitless government oversight into the lives of each and every American citizen is as much a threat to security as it is a bulwark should be apt enough to underpin the seriousness of this debate.

And while the Supreme Court, with a median age of 67 years, tries applying 40 year old legal procedures over the confiscation of personal effects from arrested individuals, the rest of us who depend on our cellphones and mobile devices to store our personal information are witnessing the decline of liberty for the American public and the rise of the omnipotent, security-obsessed nanny state, which offers nothing more than perceived threats of terror and destruction to garnish our compliance and servility.

The decision is expected to be handed down by late June.

Sources:

  1. AP: Justices wary of unlimited cellphone searches – http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/apr/29/no-warrant-cellphone-searches-before-supreme-court/
  2. The Wire: What You Need To Know About the Cell Phone Privacy Arguments at the Supreme Court Today – http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-cell-phone-privacy-arguments-at-the-supreme-court-today/361362/

 

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Edward Snowden, Spying and Privacy, Supreme Court, Voting Technology

About John Amaruso

John Amaruso is a filmmaker and writer based in the greater New York area. His interests include politics, film, and travel. You can find his other writings on his website Mind Under Matter or by following him on Twitter @MindUnderMattr or on Facebook. John is the director of DC's documentary film "Design of a Broken System", currently filming.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Obama Expands ‘Reasonable’ Search and Seizure to Cell Phones

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

A Dangerous Reprise Of American Exceptionalism In Ukraine

By Jamie Lampidis May 15, 2022

The stakes are too high to cave into Putin’s phantasmatic imperial play, and too high to believe that this war can be won by arming Ukrainians.

On The Coming End Of Roe v. Wade

By Peter J. Dellolio May 11, 2022

Anyone who says that the evolution of law has nothing to do with politics is either very corrupt or very stupid. Laws evolved through the centuries.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

Goodbye Roe v. Wade, Goodbye Rule Of Law

By Andrew Straw May 5, 2022

Congress should impeach judges who act like that because it is not good behavior, and they were asked not to act that way when they were confirmed.

PODCAST: Debating The Future Of Debates

By Jenna Spinelle May 4, 2022

We love a good debate — and have certainly had plenty of them on this show. But how effective are they in today’s media and political landscape?

What “Pro-Palestine” Student Groups Get Wrong

By David Anderson, J.D. May 3, 2022

Back then – as now – this fit into a “colonialist” narrative of European Jews oppressing Arabs – an easy, eye pleasing but intellectually lazy fit.

Examining Government As A “Necessary Evil”

By Gary Berton April 29, 2022

Thomas Paine defines government as separate from society, and indeed if society functioned perfectly there would be no need for government.

Ukrainian And Polish History: Fighting The Empires

By Maxim Sidorenko April 26, 2022

On February 24th, Russia started an unprovoked war against Ukraine. It has become one more attempt of the empire to demolish the Ukrainian state.

PODCAST: What Student Debt Says About Democratic Institutions

By Jenna Spinelle April 26, 2022

In a new book, Josh Mitchell draws alarming parallels to the housing crisis, showing the catastrophic consequences student debt has had on families.

Aging White Men Who Commit Voter Fraud Have Nothing To Fear

By Steve Schneider April 22, 2022

The sentences stand in contrast with the actions of the Governor who recently got the state legislature to create an election integrity police force.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

North Korea Cracks Down On 'Capitalist' Pop Culture

North Korea Cracks Down On ‘Capitalist’ Pop Culture

May 6, 2022

North Korea has increased its campaign against “capitalist” style clothing, others, in broader crackdown on foreign pop culture.

DiCaprio, Ruffalo Urge Brazilians To Vote, Irking Bolsonaro

DiCaprio, Ruffalo Urge Brazilians To Vote, Irking Bolsonaro

May 6, 2022

Hollywood stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo joined other celebrities making a final push for voters in Brazil to register to vote.

Mock M&M Election Teaches Alaskans About Ranked Voting

Mock M&M Election Teaches Alaskans About Ranked Voting

April 26, 2022

There are paper cups with eight different kinds of M&M near the entrance to Amalga Distillery in Juneau for a mock ranked choice vote.

How Moral Echo Chambers Increase Likelihood Of Radicalism

How Moral Echo Chambers Increase Likelihood Of Radicalism

April 21, 2022

Moral convergence – group of people who share moral standards – emerges in online situations where communities share similar values.

Dr. Oz Seeks To Make History In US Senate Bid

Dr. Oz Seeks To Make History In US Senate Bid

April 16, 2022

Trump’s endorsement of Dr. Oz in the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania adds a new wrinkle to the tight race for GOP nominee in a month.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy