• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Why the Government Must Act on Social Media Election Regulations

By Jenny Oak Tree - September 19, 2018 Leave a Comment

FacebookTweetLinkedInPinShares11
Social Media Election Regulations
link

Election meddling is not a new concept, for Russia or America. America’s election meddling is a time-honored tradition disguised as democracy promotion, aligning countries with American values, and various other rationalizations.

Social media has opened the door for easier election incursions that involve misinformation campaigns and influencing elections through providing inaccurate information. While “fake news” has been a rallying call of Trump, it probably all started with Russia’s incursion in the 2016 election.

America has meddled in elections, going so far as to oust the Shah of Iran in the 1970s, which shifted Iran from a potential liberal country to one based on religious theocracy. Even Obama can be accused of meddling in the Israeli elections, specifically buying ads and putting people on the ground to have Israelis oust Likud PM Netanyahu and vote for the Kadima Party’s most influential member, Tzipi Livni. Election meddling did not start and end with the Russian incursion of 2016 and is not an isolated incident without the ability to be repeated.

Social media has allowed election meddling to be easier. It’s a global network of connections that have groups and pages dedicated to causes and philosophies. These causes and philosophies can post any items, memes, photos, or videos that showcase information, any of which might not be true. Russia is not new to cyber incursions either, as they have tried to meddle in American elections since the 1990s. However, social media has allowed for a less sophisticated approach that predates the creation of social media.

Nowadays academic cyber security research is devoted to social media investigations of potential Russian incursions for the purpose of attacking America through various misinformation campaigns. The most important thing social media has been able to do is make misinformation campaigns easier.

So, what role do the regulators of social media and the CEOs of social media do to prevent this? That’s really an ill-defined question because regulation of social media has yet to be enacted. While the FCC and FTC provide a framework that started with radio and television regulation, social media may be harder because it’s less defined. For instance, Facebook owns three social media platforms: Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Because of the prevalence of social media and how to define what is social media, it’s hard to say what percentage of social media is monopolized by Facebook and how the FTC and FCC could regulate such influence. This question is best left to legislators to decide, as social media legislation must be written with new rules and regulations specifically designed to target social media.

The question of the influence of the CEOs of social media to regulate their own platforms is a matter of opinion. The ability to regulate speech on social media is left to platform’s mediators and not Congress or the American people or any other body. So, it really is a question of what CEOs deem as misinformation. Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has made a show of trying to tap down on misinformation campaigns, highlighting ones from Iran and Russia in the last few months. So far his efforts have only proved that Zuckerberg cannot do much to stave off these attacks. A concerted effort by NSA, FBI, and other bodies may be the way forward to prevent such attacks.

The two challenges ahead of us are that election meddling is easier than before and regulation of social media is more muddled than ever. It will take great movement by Congress towards new legislation and the action of other government bodies such as the FTC and FCC’s influence to provide a firewall to protect American elections. Private companies like Facebook have little chance of standing up to Russia’s intelligence services alone.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPinShares11

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Internet and Democracy, Journalism and Free Speech, Social Media and Democracy, Spying and Privacy, Voting Technology

About Jenny Oak Tree

Jenny Oak Tree writes for Democracy Chronicles from the state of Alabama. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well. Together, they help cover free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Syria Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Why the Government Must Act on Social Media Election Regulations

Primary Sidebar

donate button

America After Trump

By Jenny Oak Tree

Our country must grieve and we must understand the trauma that has been created by Trumpism. Only then can the United States rise again.

Teaching Voting Theory With a Card-Based Voting Game

By Steve Cobb

This uniquely inventive new game’s name ‘Concurrence’ is a play on words: it means “agreement” in English and “competition” in Russian.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

U

By Aydasara Ortega

Data governance surfaces as key terrain on which to regulate firms engaged in datafication by responding to the injustices of informational capitalism.

On The Dynamics of Abortion. And Argentina.

By David Anderson, J.D.

There’s big news from Argentina lately. By a fair margin abortion was finally legalized there last month after decades of grassroots activism.

An Expat American in the Middle East Discusses Trump Concerns

By Steve Schneider

Democracy Chronicles author Steve Schneider interviews ex-pat American Jason Meursault who shares his overseas perspective on the Capitol riot.

Why Trump Should be Impeached

By Jack Jones

Trump’s tenure was a reign of terror. The 6 Jan insurrection is ground for Senate impeachment to prevent him from causing further damage to our democracy.

On Approval Voting and the National Popular Vote

By Steve Cobb

Though written without regard for alternative voting methods, maybe the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is OK.

Is Giuliani a Speech-Maker or a Criminal Instigator?

By Steve Schneider

Rudy Giuliani is Trump’s personal lawyer. He has spoken in two rallies that became criminal riots, including the Jan 6, 2021, mob attack on The Capitol.

Democracy Counts in Georgia; D.C. in Chaos

By Steve Schneider

Major upheavals in American politics saw democrats winning Georgia on Jan 5, 2021 while on Jan 6 a Trump mob attacked The Capitol to stop certification of Biden’s victory.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Protest Art from Around the World

Foundation Publishes Protest Art from Around the World

Art has been a powerful medium of protest and creative expression to expose the deception and social bankruptcy of tyranny.

Protecting Californian Elections

How Bad Jokes Complicated Protecting Californian Elections

Public records show California’s scattershot cybersecurity approach ensnared some people who say they were joking.

Kanye West Kept Off the 2020 Arizona Ballot

Why Was Kanye West Kept Off the 2020 Arizona Ballot?

On September 8, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a short order saying Kanye West could not be on the ballot as an independent candidate for president.

Political Comedy Helps Young Adults

Study Claims Political Comedy Helps Young Adults

Interesting news on this front comes from the University of Pennsylvania: New research suggests that humor may

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy