Dropping preferential voting in favor of Sri Lanka proportional representation to build peace
Democracy, elections and voting at Democracy Chronicles
A simple method for a permanent people’s government
You are here: Home / Democracy News Headlines / International Democracy / National Proposal for Sri Lanka Proportional Representation
Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics
Africa
American Corruption
American Local Elections
American State Elections
Asia
Capitalism and Big Business
Celebrity Politics
China
Democracy Charity
Democracy Protests
Democrats
Dictatorships
Education
Election History
Election Methods
Election Security
Election Transparency
Europe
Internet and Democracy
Journalism and Free Speech
Middle East
Minority Voting Rights
Money Politics
New York City and State Elections
Political Artwork
Political Dissidents
Political Lobbying
Redistricting
Republicans
Russia
Socialism and Labor
Social Media and Democracy
South America
Spying and Privacy
Supreme Court
Third Party
Voter Access
Voter ID
Voter Registration
Voter Suppression
Voter Turnout
Voting Technology
Women Voting Rights
Worldwide
Worldwide Corruption
About DC Editors
We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.
CCKK says
If the proposed mixed system has 125 for first-pass-the-post and 75 for proportional allocation, first a ceiling (upper limit) should be set before the proportional allocation. Limit is number of seats according total country votes. e.g who gets 60% they are entitled for 120 seats. If they have already taken 100 from first-pass system they will get only the gap of 20. Not a 60% from 75 seats. Then it will secure a small party who gets 5% to have 10 seats.
This ceiling should be fixed when mixing two systems. Only gap is filled from the 75 proportional allocation. Then small parties will get the right amount. Any party which gets less than 1% should not give any seat to discourage waste on lots of parties.
A bonus of 5 should be given from the national list of 25 for the winner to have a stable government.
Adrian Tawfik says
Thanks for the comment. I am not an expert on the details but what you said makes sense. Checkout our EM Central page for more on proportional representation too.