• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

Strengthen Whistleblowers’ Legal Channels to Challenge System

by Kiefer Kofman - October 23, 2014

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Strengthen Whistleblowers Like SnowdenLet’s imagine for a moment that Edward Snowden had gone through the proper channels of the government in his effort to expose the illegalities of the American government. How would this have played out? We consistently here from National Security experts or legal experts such as Jeff Toobin that if Snowden had just gone through the proper channels to release NSA documents, the American justice system would have acted as the proverbial guardians of true democracy. Could we possibly know if this is true? From what the American people see, there aren’t very many cases that help to validate this claim or debunk it; thus, merely shedding a very limited light on two sides of the argument.

Ralph Nader Third-Party Presidential Debate
US civic activist Ralph Nader coined the phrase, whistleblower, in the early 1970s to avoid the negative connotations found in other words such as “informers” and “snitches”. (Nader, Petkas, and Blackwell, Whistleblowing 1972)

In fact, quite surprisingly the conventional wisdom is in stark contrast with reality. Let’s take the most recent case of whistleblower Jeffrey Scudder who worked in the CIA’s historical collections division. This division of the Central Intelligence Agency is specifically constructed to sift through old documents that can be safely released to the American people.

According to Greg Miller’s article published yesterday in the Washington Post, Scudder discovered thousands of documents he thought should be released, and worked assiduously through the proper channels to ensure that this would be done to the rule of law. Unfortunately, as other influential people have similarly scrutinized, Scudder was stonewalled consistently.

Scudder took a further step toward his incandescent commitment to inform the American people of highly pertinent information: he filed two requests under the Freedom of Information Act- hardly a rogue move. Scudder’s requests fell into two categories: One, ”sought to obtain new digital copies of articles already slated for release, and another aimed at articles yet to be cleared.”

Six months after Scudder’s request, he was rewarded for his courage and patriotic intentions by being ”summoned into a meeting with the Counterintelligence Center, was put on administrative leave, was instructed not to travel overseas, and questioned by the FBI.” Further, Scudder had every computer in his home seized by the FBI (including his daughter’s). The CIA has refused to comment on the subject. While one should not jump toward any pre-conceived conclusions, we must take a look at additional prior cases that may illuminate what going through the proper channels actually entails.

History shows need to strengthen whistleblowers

Thomas Drake, a former senior executive of the NSA and decorated Air Force and Navy veteran, also exposed NSA secret surveillance programs (namely the Trailblazer program’s waste, fraud, and privacy abuse which was suppose to create the foundation for the modern restructuring of gathering intelligence for the NSA) as early as 2005. Drake stated in an interview that ”Everything I passed on to Congress just went into a black hole.” Drake, along with fellow whistleblowers, went to Congress and was briefed by Sen. Ron Wyden and Sen. Mark Udall. Here is the ever more important point, however: Many Senators and members of Congress don’t have the security clearance and would not have been able to see such information. In addition, many Senators and members of Congress are either indifferent because they are obliquely affected, or satisfied with the modus operandi of American politics- more specifically, the revolving door of private security contractors in conjunction with political positions.

Drake and his fellow whistleblowers made complaints to the DOD’s inspector general. Did the proper channels maintain the accountability standard we envisaged? The inspector general ”gave up the names of the whistleblowers (Thomas Drake, William Binney, Ed Loomis, and Kirk Wiebe).” According to William Binney, ”We tried to stay for the better part of seven years inside the government trying to get the government to recognize the unconstitutional and illegal activity. And that just failed totally because no one in Congress or -we couldn’t get anybody in the courts, and certainly the DOJ and Inspector General’s Office paid no attention to it.” As a result, the four whistleblowers endured years of legal harassment, and their concerns stonewalled and belittled by the government.

There are two main points to dissect from this: One, without these cases, or similar cases brought to light in the whistleblowing debate, how can the American public surmise an adequate assessment of legal whistleblowing that many in the government/ political establishment purport ad nauseam? Two, and the more broad point to take away from this, is the justification of illegal whistleblowing; which, in lieu of history, is a highly oxymoronic phrase. Albeit so, we must also begin to accept whistleblowing as a prime conduit for raw investigative journalism. Is there a fine line to whistleblowing on classified material? Yes. Yet, when whistleblowing exposes clear illegalities that is carefully disseminated to assure the information won’t bring further/immediate harm to American citizens and troops, nor is intentionally being used to aid an enemy state, and is unbeknownst to the American people, there is zero justification for defaming and jailing those whistleblowers.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: American Corruption, Edward Snowden, Election Transparency, Julian Assange and Wikileaks, Spying and Privacy, Technology Dissidents

About Kiefer Kofman

Kiefer Kofman writes for Democracy Chronicles from his home in New York. His interests include social justice, consumer activism and other social issues.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dr. K says

    October 23, 2014 at 9:27 pm

    Very poignant, on the mark and thorough in scope.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | Strengthen Whistleblowers’ Legal Channels to Challenge System

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy