• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | CULTURE | Scalia is Protagonist in Supreme Court Theater Production

Scalia is Protagonist in Supreme Court Theater Production

March 22, 2015 by DC Editors Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Citizens United decision featured in Supreme Court theater company’s new play in Washington D.C.

Democracy, elections and voting at Democracy Chronicles

To research his latest role, actor Edward Gero had to go to court: the Supreme Court. His character? Real-life Justice Antonin Scalia. But the new play “The Originalist” is more than a portrait of the famously combative leader of the court’s conservative wing. It’s also a story about the polarization of American politics and bridging the gap. Jeffrey Brown reports.

Protagonist Supreme Court Theater

Transcript:

JUDY WOODRUFF: Next: The audience is the judge in the case of Scalia vs. Scalia, a portrait of the Supreme Court justice opening tonight at Washington’s Arena Stage.

Jeffrey Brown has our look.

EDWARD GERO, “The Originalist”: The court has been my theater, and I have the costumes.

JEFFREY BROWN: In the new play “The Originalist,” the first thing you notice about actor Edward Gero is his striking physical resemblance to the character he’s playing, the real-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

EDWARD GERO: I tell people what they don’t want to hear. That’s also what makes me a monster. That’s how half the country see me, aggressive, combative, law and order conservative. Other half sees me as a hero, aggressive, combative, law and order conservative. Which am I?

JEFFREY BROWN: As it happens, both the justice and the actor trace their heritage to nearby villages in Southern Italy. Both are from New Jersey, raised in Catholic homes and schools.

To really be Scalia, all Gero had to do was take a short ride over to the Supreme Court, to watch the justice in action to get the mannerisms down.

EDWARD GERO: He sort of closes his eyes a little bit and heightens his sense of listening.

JEFFREY BROWN: All right, show me. Show me.

EDWARD GERO: Well, you know, he will — he will listen, and then when he hears something, then he will pounce, right? So he sort of gathers up and searching for the right word or for the logic of the argument. Then, once he grabs onto it, he will launch and have a question.

JEFFREY BROWN: Antonin Scalia, of course, is the famously combative leader of the court’s conservative wing, and currently its longest-serving member.

A lover of opera, which the play uses to great effect, and operatic himself in both charm and bluster, he’s an intellectual powerhouse.

EDWARD GERO: Look, I’m not an ideologue. I am an originalist.

JEFFREY BROWN: And a firm proponent that judges should look only to the original text and meaning of the Constitution.

EDWARD GERO: To interpret the Constitution as it is written and as it was understood when the authors crafted the original document. It’s as important as that. Now, the other side of the argument is obvious and wrong. The Constitution is a living document. It must change with the times. Nonsense. Society changes. Fashion changes. The Constitution stands.

JEFFREY BROWN: Playwright John Strand says he was attracted to Scalia’s big personality, but even more to his central place in so many issues in today’s public life.

JOHN STRAND, Playwright, “The Originalist”: I think most people, if they saw that there was a play with Justice Scalia as the main character done at a theater in the United States, they’d expect to see perhaps a hatchet job on the justice, because, sure…

JEFFREY BROWN: You were conscious of that?

JOHN STRAND: Oh, very conscious of that, and it was never my intention to do that. I think that would be childish.

I’m much more interested in exploring who he is, and what his views are, and why came to those views.

JEFFREY BROWN: In fact, what Strand and director Molly Smith say they are examining here is the polarization of American politics today.

MOLLY SMITH, Artistic Director, Arena Stage: And I think we are now in a place where audiences and where artists are really interested in the political system. Why? Because everybody sees it is broken. How can we fix it? How can we present, produce plays on stage that are about this subject?

JEFFREY BROWN: The play explores this by introducing a liberal law clerk played by Kerry Warren. She’s a fictional character, but Scalia has on occasion hired liberal clerks. She’s the opposite of Scalia in every way, excerpt in her fierceness.

KERRY WARREN, Actress: You are probably the most polarizing figure in American civic life.

EDWARD GERO: Is that how you imagine a law clerk speaks to a Supreme Court justice? Probably? I hold the title, thank you very much. Strike the probably. Have you any other honesty to inflict?

KERRY WARREN: Yes, sir.

EDWARD GERO: Well?

KERRY WARREN: Sir, I detest your rulings on just about every important topic, abortion, gay marriage, gun rights, executive privilege

EDWARD GERO: Affirmative action.

KERRY WARREN: Affirmative action, campaign financing, especially Citizens United, capital punishment, the Florida recount, and others.

EDWARD GERO: Detest?

KERRY WARREN: Disagree with strongly?

EDWARD GERO: Detest is good. Let it stand.

KERRY WARREN: Yes, sir. Thank you. Also…

EDWARD GERO: Oh, there’s more.

KERRY WARREN: You’re a monster.

EDWARD GERO: Do you have a habit of crossing the line, Miss?

KERRY WARREN: I don’t mean to be disrespectful, sir. But monster was your term. I need to learn about monsters.

EDWARD GERO: Why?

KERRY WARREN: Because we most fear what we don’t understand.

JEFFREY BROWN: The two spar intellectually, but soon enough with respect, even developing a friendship.

JOHN STRAND: I thought, if we have people who are at polar opposites politically and let’s say even culturally, socially, then we have got the possibility of exploring through those two characters how you take a step toward the other person with whom you disagree.

JEFFREY BROWN: Actor Edward Gero has long combined verbal jousting and adherence to historical texts through his many years on stage performing Shakespeare.

As I was watching you do this, the power and majesty often in Shakespeare plays, and here you are, the power and majesty, the Supreme Court.

EDWARD GERO: Right. There’s no question they’re analogous.

JEFFREY BROWN: Yes?

EDWARD GERO: The focus on language and the listening. The people who inhabit these plays of Shakespeare bear a great respect for the speaker. They’re searching for the truth of the argument.

JEFFREY BROWN: Does Scalia strike you as any particular Shakespearian character?

EDWARD GERO: Well, you know he played Macbeth, so — and I think he’s really proud of having done that.

JEFFREY BROWN: Over lunch recently, Gero got to talk to Scalia about Shakespeare and more, though not about politics or the play, he insists.

And, as he showed us in his dressing room, he was able to pick up a few more tips for playing the justice.

EDWARD GERO: I love the sort of — this pursing of the — through here. You see it again here.

JEFFREY BROWN: Yes.

For all the human focus in “The Originalist,” there’s a lot of actual law, much of it centered on a 2013 landmark ruling by the court on gay marriage. The play uses Scalia’s own words from speeches and opinions. People who know him, lawyers, former clerks, legal reporters, helped ensure a level of accuracy and authenticity.

As to the originalist himself, there’s no word yet as to whether Justice Scalia will attend this play, in which he himself is central to the debate.

For the PBS NewsHour, I’m Jeffrey Brown at the Arena Stage in Washington.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: Democracy Culture Tagged With: Antonin Scalia, Citizens United, Political Artwork, Supreme Court

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About DC Editors

We are your source for news on the all important effort to establish and strengthen democracy across the globe. Our international team with dozens of independent authors are your gateway into the raging struggle for free and fair elections on every continent with a focus on election reform in the United States. See our Facebook Page and also follow us on Twitter @demchron.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • “California Says D.O.J. System for Identifying Noncitizens Is Sloppy”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 hours ago
  • “California officials who process ballots from suspected noncitizens risk prosecution, US warns”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 hours ago
  • NAACP Files New Complaint Against DOJ Plan to Send “Election Monitors,” Arguing That It is a Plan to Intimidate Voters in Violation of the Voting Rights Act
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 12 hours ago
  • “Russia Appears to Step Up Efforts to Influence U.S. Voters” (And U.S. Intelligence Officials Could Not Establish a Secure Connection to Brief State Election Personnel!)
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago
  • California State Court in Santa Monica Case Declares that Parts of the California Voting Rights Act are Unconstitutional after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Callais Case
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 15 hours ago