Two new candidates for Seattle Mayor have relied heavily on “democracy vouchers” whose use is increasing in the city’s elections.
Public Financing of Elections articles on DC
This Public Financing of Elections section has news on multiple countries that choose to use government funding to run campaigns, a practice widespread in South America and Europe. The mechanisms for this can be quite varied, ranging from direct subsidy of political parties to government matching funds for certain types of private donations (often small donations) to exemption from fees of government services (e.g. postage) and many other systems as well. Also check out our sections on American democracy or Money Politics.
A D.C federal judge ruled Wednesday that federal candidates can now raise money to repay themselves after elections are over.
Democracy vouchers,” funded by property taxes and being used in a Seattle mayoral race for the first time, are key to the local vote.
Because of technical advantages, the Democratic Party has drawn an increasing share of money from small donors in recent cycles.
Residents’ reactions to a ballot measure that would offer city funds to residents to finance local election campaigns are mixed.
There can be no doubt whatsoever that America’s campaign finance regime is a wild west that diminishes the power of the many.
Seattle’s democracy vouchers which some people call “monopoly money” actually translate into real cash for local political campaigns.
Despite corporations promising to halt donations to Republican lawmakers who backed Trump Republican fundraising is little hurt.
New York City’s Campaign Finance Board recently awarded an unprecedented $37 million in matching funds to candidates for public office.
The lack of access to sufficient funding from their parties and external networks is a major obstacle to women participation in politics.