• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

The Post-2020 Election Discourse on Police Abolition

by Erin Green - December 20, 2020

FacebookTweet1LinkedInPinShare1
The Post-2020 Election Discourse on Police Abolition
American cop – Image source

President Obama decided to give his opinion about the current discourse of  police brutality, specifically about the phrase “defund the police.” According to The Hill, Obama said: “You lost a big audience the minute you say it, which makes it a lot less likely that you’re actually going to get the changes you want done…The key is deciding, do you want to actually get something done, or do you want to feel good among the people you already agree with?” If we’re talking about winning congressional elections in “swing states,” then I guess President Obama has a point, but if we’re talking about the crux of the movement, he’s absolutely wrong.

There has been a lot of talk about the correlation between activist work and electoral politics, which is interesting, and in some cases damaging. Of course, rhetoric is an important factor in candidates winning or losing elections because, for a lot of campaigns, rhetoric is the heart of that type of work. What I want to make clear is what the movement is about and what it is not about, because there seems to be some confusion since the 2020 election.

Democratic House Minority Whip, James Clyburn, has made several appearances post-election detailing how “defund the police” has led to the loss of congressional seats. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez addressed this in a podcast, stating “these movements are not going away. And now they’re blaming us for their loss. And so I need my colleagues to understand that we are not the enemy. And that their base is not the enemy. That the movement for Black Lives is not the enemy.” I think it’s important to clarify what Black Lives Matter and “defund the police” or “abolish the police” is and is not. These are social movements demanding justice. Abolition started way before this summer’s tragedies of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and other Black deaths. Abolition, of yes police, has been a movement before the summer of 2020. Abolitionists have been speaking about these specific issues for years. Abolitionists, for years, have been addressing policing as violence, the prison industrial complex, racial violence, racial capitalism, and the legacy of slavery. These are not new concepts. I think the problem is that people are not reading and acknowledging the work of abolitionists.

Another problem is our desire to conflate social movements and activists with electoral politics and politicians. Political activists and community organizers are not engaging in these movements to elect someone. Black Lives Matter activists are not even running for office. The movement itself is not about electoral politics, even though a lot of Democratic politicians have reduced it to that. To Obama’s point of “losing people and elections,” I think a lot of politicians like AOC and Cori Bush (who do demand for this movement) have communicated pretty well the movement’s meaning—while using the phrase—and they won their seats. Abolition was never about winning congressional seats, but the Party made it about that and made it a PR issue which is what I’m most upset about. The activists who started the movement weren’t running for office but somehow people started conflating the two. Conflating the two is dangerous because these activists are not invested in these movements to win House and Senate seats. They are invested in these movements to stop police from murdering Black and brown people.

People who study rhetoric might argue that “defund the police” puts up a wall for our political discourse. They might recommend a more polite way that doesn’t make people uncomfortable. I argue people should be uncomfortable with the high rate of police violence. I would also argue that they might want to review Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail, specifically the section about the danger of the white moderate. People might argue the ideas of the movement aren’t being communicated when one says “defund/abolish the police.” I feel like people who say this don’t do the reading that’s presented to them because this is just inaccurate. Not only have politicians who co-opt this movement been explaining what policies they propose regarding “defunding the police,” but we have years and years of work from political scientists, sociologists, and organizers who detail what it means to “defund the police.” At this point, it is not a matter if it’s being communicated, because it has been communicated. The matter is have you listened? Have you done the reading? Have you asked questions for clarification?

There are way too many people doing work in this field—academics, activists, and politicians—to simply say no one is communicating what they mean. For Obama to reduce these movements to “winning congressional seats,” is depressing because ending police violence for members of these social movements is so much more important than winning an election. I also think this speaks to another issue: our dependency on thinking that electoral politics is the only way to make a change. Voting is a great act of civic engagement and voting does make political change, but it is not the only way of making change. People who see electoral politics as the only avenue for change probably do see Black Lives Matter or “Defund/Abolish the Police” as simply a slogan…a combination of energetic words, but it’s not. A slogan and a movement are two completely different things, and we should not reduce a movement to how marketable it is. We’re trying to save Black communities, not sell vacuum cleaners.

I know for a lot of people this may be brand new to them, but the movement itself is not, and the good thing about that is that there are tons of resources for people to educate themselves on these subjects. And because there is a plentiful amount of resources, most of which is accessible to all people, we should begin to address that it is not a slogan that people are turned off by, but instead a culture of ignoring systemic issues. The main question people ask when someone argues for abolishing the police is “well what about crime?” People assume that abolish the police means just get rid of the police and do something else. At this point, people just aren’t willing to educate themselves because years and years of work prove that assumption to be false. Getting rid of the police is neither the first nor the last step for abolition, but a single step within a series of steps seeking to end police violence.

Ending with Obama’s comments, I want to quote Cori Bush, “It’s not a slogan. It’s a mandate for keeping our people alive.” If we wanted to say “reform the police,” then we would have said that. We said defund for a reason. To “defund the police” is not a slogan for something else. It is an act. I also would like to provide a guide with resources for understanding police and/or prison abolition. I am providing this resource so readers will know what it means to “defund and abolish.” Now that I have provided you the resources and materials, it is up to you to educate yourself on why we must end police violence and not simply reform it.

FacebookTweet1LinkedInPinShare1

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Democrats, Republicans

About Erin Green

Erin writes for Democracy Chronicles from Maryland, where he is a doctoral student in English literature. He enjoys writing about abolitionist movements, cultural politics, poverty, and political rhetorics.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | The Post-2020 Election Discourse on Police Abolition

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy