• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Thomas Paine and the Origins of Modern Democracy, Part II

Thomas Paine and the Origins of Modern Democracy, Part II

March 25, 2022 by Gary Berton 1 Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

An introduction to Paine’s principles of the structure of democracy

The mechanisms that were central to Paine’s political theories are rooted in his ideology of first principles. The basic foundation of these principles is equality, and as a direct result, justice. If equality is practiced, then all people share equal justice. His first principles built the structure of democracy.

“Mankind being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance…” Common Sense 1776

“WHEN a people agree to form themselves into a republic (for the word REPUBLIC means the PUBLIC GOOD, or the good of the whole, in contradistinction to the despotic form, which makes the good of the sovereign, or of one man, the only object of the government) when, I say, they agree to do this, it is to be understood, that they mutually resolve and pledge themselves to each other, rich and poor alike, to support and maintain this rule of equal justice among them. They therefore renounce not only the despotic form, but the despotic principle, as well of governing as of being governed by mere Will and Power, and substitute in its place a government of justice.” Dissertations on Government 1786.

The structure of his democratic theory is like a house: the foundation of that house is equality and justice – everything else rests upon it. If this principle is compromised and weakened, the whole structure is vulnerable to corruption and oppression. Inherent in the equality/justice principle is rights – both natural and civil, civil arising from natural rights. These are inherent, and received upon birth, without exception. Defending these rights is the object of democratic government.

The four supports that construct the walls of the structure, resting on this foundation, consist of 1) rejection of precedent, 2) no one should live worse off than in the state of nature, 3) recognizing the natural sociability of humanity, and 4) Enlightenment reason. A few thoughts on each:

1) Precedent got us into the problems of government. They represent the failures to ensure equality and justice. Precedent is the “originalist” interpretation of the Constitution; it’s the way things were always done, so they become the excuse to maintain “tradition”; it is the wall preventing people from building the democratic structures of a better world, and instead reinforce the structures that promote elitism, privilege, and injustice.

2) If civilization progressed, why are masses of the people worse off than if they lived in small groups in nature? That is not progress. The well-being of every person is what democracy insists upon; if many or most people live worse off than in small groups in nature, civilization is not progressing but regressing. Why is another discussion.

3) Humanity evolved as a social animal; that natural sociability is the basis of democracy. Building upon it is fundamental to democracy.

4) The basis of knowing and using the real world around us must be the only basis for knowledge, applying that knowledge to solve problems. Anything else, invented to confuse, manipulate, and confuse the people in their decision-making, is then anti-democratic.

On top of this structure is a roof that protects the structure from outside elements. The roof consists of constitutions and democratic structures and laws.

The bizarro world of Edmund Burke says the opposite. It is the political theory of oligarchy. The foundation is order, not equality; his four pillars are “defending historical precedent”; follow “tradition” not Enlightenment; continuity not change for the better; and humanity as a collection of “disconnected individuals”. Its roof is prescription and elite rule, not a democratic order.

You can see how Paine challenged the entire philosophical structure of not only 18th century life and custom, but the life and custom of most of the world today.

Part III: Libertarianism is anti-democratic. Paine was not a libertarian.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election History, Founding Fathers, Thomas Paine, Worldwide

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Gary Berton

Gary Berton writes for DC from New York. He is President of the Thomas Paine National Historical Association and Associate Editor of the Collected Works of Thomas Paine Project.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kerry Cort says

    July 30, 2023 at 2:46 pm

    Thank you for the article and your work focusing on Thomas Paine. I’ve only become acutely aware of him in the last year and from what I’ve seen, view him as the epitome of a true patriot. Our country would definitely do well to look to his example and his views on democracy to help us find our democratic roots again.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ, partners express alarm over detention of...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 hours ago
  • CPJ joins landmark mission to the Philippines...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 6 hours ago
  • Montana Plan is not Without Its Skeptics
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 6 hours ago
  • France 24 and RFI broadcasters suspended in T...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 7 hours ago
  • Hold the Line Coalition welcomes Maria Ressa...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 8 hours ago