• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy

Democracy Chronicles

The Torture Memos Are Not the Answer

by Joan Krickellas - July 7, 2016

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

The Torture Memos

In 1949, just after World War II, the Geneva Conventions were established to set standards for the humanitarian treatment of wartime prisoners. The Conventions are a set of treaties adopted by all nations in the world defining these prisoners’ inalienable rights and stating the protections entitled to the wounded combatants. However, the rise of terrorism has caused for US officials to feel the need to treat those involved with terrorism in a manner that does not abide by the provisions set in the Conventions. Thus, in 2002, they issued the Torture Memos, which lays out a very narrow view of what behavior might constitute torture. This helps interrogators in the CIA avoid prosecution, despite the inhumane actions they are taking against detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, and other locations. However, in my opinion, the US’s rejection of the Geneva Convention in favor of the Torture memos is not effective. Such rejection taints the US’s reputation as a nation committed to human rights, allows for the violation of human rights to drastically increase, and provides the president with too much authority as commander in chief.

The US is a nation with strong constitutional protections for basic rights. It is a nation supposedly dedicated to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, yet it commits serious violations of these rights when terrorism is brought into question. It is argued that the maltreatment of suspected terrorists is committed to ensure safety and security; torturing them may cause them to eventually disclose information on terrorist activities.

But, how can the US, a nation founded on freedom, allow for the torture of people who are only suspect?

A glimpse into a book I very much enjoyed, the Guantanamo Diary, written by Mohammedou Slahi, who was detained on suspicion of being involved in a plot to bomb Los Angeles international airport, details the acts of torture committed by the US rendition and torture program against him. He was subjected to death threats, sleep deprivation, and sexual humiliation even though there was no evidence against him. Slahi was tortured to the point where he actually made false confessions. The US can be seen by other nations as hypocritical; they may come to realize that the legal standards in the US Constitution do not apply to everyone around the globe and that the US’s commitment to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are merely circumstantial. In Slahi’s circumstance, Constitutional freedoms do not apply. However, if another country detained an American soldier on the grounds of violating humanitarian law, wouldn’t the US want Geneva Convention protections applied to him?

In addition to tainting the US’s reputation, the rejection of the Geneva Conventions by the US could cause an increase in humanitarian crime. If the Conventions do not apply, then not only could the US inflict torture on suspects, but terrorist groups would be open to being able to do so as well. There would be no limits to torture, since the Torture Memos replacing the Conventions have such a narrow definition. If a detainee decides not to divulge information after being shaken or hit, the government could move on to more severe measures, such as the application of electric shocks and rape. Once torture is allowed, setting the limits would be extremely difficult. As a result, no one would be able to enjoy the benefit of their protections as a matter of law.

Finally, the president has the power to approve of any technique needed to protect the nation’s security. Thus, he has the authority to order physical and psychological torture, despite federal laws stating otherwise. In the Pentagon’s torture memo in 2004, the president’s power is justified on the grounds that “the greater good for society will be accomplished by violating the literal language of criminal law.” However, allowing the president’s powers to override federal laws prohibiting torture implies that his power is supreme, creating an imbalance within the branches of US government, completely violating the strong separation of powers that forms the basis of the Constitution.

No branch of government should be able to act alone, no matter how long and cumbersome the legislative process may be, because by giving the President, one man, too much unbridled power, future tyranny is more likely to occur. I am not claiming to know the answer to tackling terrorism. But, I do know that the Torture Memos are ineffective because we still see, 14 years later, terrorism continuing to rapidly perpetuate and destroy too many innocent lives.

FacebookTweetLinkedInPin

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Civil Rights

About Joan Krickellas

Joan Krickellas is a student at Vassar College majoring in environmental studies, with particular emphasis in biology and women’s studies. Social issues she finds to be of particular interest include those that pertain to human rights, migration/immigration, discrimination, and climate change. She firmly believes that everyone should have the right to voice their opinions. Democracy Chronicles is where she feels comfortable in voicing her own.

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home | DC AUTHORS | The Torture Memos Are Not the Answer

Primary Sidebar

Advertise button

The Christian Evangelical Church

By Jack Jones January 22, 2023

I am not against Big Business having a voice, just not all the voices, and especially not an impersonator pretending to speak for God.

No One In Monterey County Is Good Enough To Serve In Legislature

By Joe Mathews January 9, 2023

California’s “democratic reforms” have left a place as… [key] as Monterey County without any state representation from one of its own.

democracy chronicles newsletter

DC AUTHORS

In America, the Joe-mocracy Rules

By Joe Mathews December 27, 2022

A republic? A democracy? No, our country is an avuncular autocracy run by old guys named joe.

Property Rights, Indiana-Style

By Andrew Straw December 24, 2022

Indiana’s justices have replaced constitutional property rights with ad hominem politics. Replacing them starts with better governors.

To The American Oligarchs: Lay Off Us

By Jack Jones December 21, 2022

No matter how many jobs are ruthlessly pulled out from under us, we are still going to do what it takes to put food on the table.

Indiana’s Irrational Ballot Access System

By Andrew Straw December 4, 2022

Opposing the potential 2024 retention of the Chief Justice Loretta Rush will be key to preventing disability discrimination bad blood in Indiana courts.

Federal Judge Strikes Down Biden’s Loan Forgiveness program

By Jack Jones November 24, 2022

What is unlawful is the Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down President Biden’s loan forgiveness program, not the program itself.

DeSantis Battles Trump in Florida Steel Cage Match

By Steve Schneider November 20, 2022

We take you now to the much-anticipated DeSantis-Trump steel cage match, in which “DeSanctimonious” has promised to “kick Trump’s ass.”

Why Gambling Can’t Really Lose In California

By Joe Mathews November 2, 2022

When state voters approved an expansion of casino gaming, gaming interests assured us that gambling here would be governed by strict limits.

MORE FROM OUR AUTHORS

VISIT OUR POLITICAL ART SECTION:

dc political art

DEMOCRACY CULTURE

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

Girl Scouts Earn Democracy Badge At Workshop In Salina

January 26, 2023

The workshop assisted Girl Scouts in grades K–10 in earning their Democracy Badge through learning activities on democracy.

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

Study: Media Can Reduce Polarization By Telling Personal Stories

January 26, 2023

Sharing personal experiences and pairing them with facts reduces political dehumanization and increases political tolerance.

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

Study: 2020 Election Resulted In Increased Anxiety And Depression

January 7, 2023

A review of 2020 Household Pulse Survey data reveals that as an election nears, people in [America] report more depression and anxiety.

Key Iran Labor Sectors Launch Major Strikes

Charlie Hebdo Caricatures Iran’s Mullahs

January 7, 2023

The satirical weekly is publishing a special issue on Wednesday, January 4, mocking Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in support of the protests…

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

First Impressions Are Strongly Influenced By Political Partisanship

December 22, 2022

How we perceive strangers or the impressions we have about them, particularly their faces, is influenced by political partisanship.

MORE CULTURE

VISIT OUR US DEMOCRACY SECTION:

American Democracy