• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | DC AUTHORS | Defending the Right to Videotape Public Meetings

Defending the Right to Videotape Public Meetings

June 7, 2014 by Stephanie Singer 1 Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Into Videotape Public Meetings

I thought it was obvious that people have the right to videotape public meetings of elected officials. But my colleagues at the Philadelphia City Commissioners actually passed a motion to remove a videographer from a recent public hearing. They actually directed an employee to remove the person and her camera. Apparently the reporters and editors at the political-machine-friendly Public Record don’t understand this basic civil right either.

So, just in case you were wondering, you have the right to videotape any public hearing or meeting of the City Commissioners (as long as you are unobtrusive and not disruptive). The most the Commissioners can do is ask you to change the location from which you are videotaping.

 Philadelphia skyline, a statue of Benjamin Franklin
From top left, the Philadelphia skyline, a statue of Benjamin Franklin, the Liberty Bell, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia City Hall, and Independence Hall

Hope to see you and your cameras at future meetings of the City Commissioners. I think we need to have a public meeting soon in order to certify the results of the May 20th election, one of the most important official acts of the City Commissioners. But my colleagues have not confirmed a meeting for this purpose. I can’t do it alone. Maybe you can help me convince them to do the right thing. Contact information is at www.PhiladelphiaVotes.com.

“Silence = Death” was the slogan on a pin I wore in college in the 1980’s to show support for the gay community in the face of the AIDS epidemic.

“Silence is consensus” is a ground rule of the Quaker method of doing business, which I learned as a faculty member in the 1990’s at Haverford College: disagreeing silently is no different, practically, from agreeing out loud.

Many of you have expressed your appreciation for the messages I have been sending. I need your help to make sure my ideas are not silenced. I need your help to amplify these messages. I need you to be my “human megaphone” by spreading the messages you hear from me in your own voice to your own audience. There are many ways to take part:

Retweet me (@sfsinger).
Put ideas in your own words and write letters to the editor of traditional publications you read.
Detail of everything is on my facebook page.

Untitled Election Videotaped public meetings City Commissioners

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Election Transparency, Internet and Democracy, Voting Technology

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Stephanie Singer

Stephanie Singer is a former City Commissioner of Philadelphia and worked to modernize the office, introducing improved hiring practices, encouraging digital distribution of public elections data, and promoting free and fair elections.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dude says

    June 12, 2014 at 6:16 pm

    You don’t need video to preserve the democratic process. Cameras are not allowed at labor board meetings or in courtrooms. That is what the stenographer with the minutes are for. Considering the ethical issues surrounding your office, to me it just looks like you are trying to create a smokescreen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • CPJ files declaration in support of detained journalist Mario Guevara 
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Musk must face lawsuit brought by voters he convinced to sign petition in $1 million-a-day election giveaway, judge says”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Adams Adviser Suspended From Campaign After Giving Cash to Reporter”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago
  • “Obama applauds Newsom’s California redistricting plan as ‘responsible’ as Texas GOP pushes new maps”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 months ago