• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
Home | AMERICA | Setback for Virginia Ballot Access Bill Follows a Pattern

Setback for Virginia Ballot Access Bill Follows a Pattern

February 3, 2018 by Adrian Tawfik Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Virginia Ballot Access Bill
Image by Adrian Tawfik

Virginia politicians defeated the latest attempt to reform the state law that determines which independent and third party candidates may run for elected office. The latest information was published by Richard Winger who has for years been seen as a leading expert in ballot access law for independent and third party candidates.

The bill, defeated by committee on February 1st, “would have eased the definition of “political party” from a group that polled 10% for any statewide race at either of the last two elections, to 3%”, according to Winger. The defeated bill was introduced by Republican Virginia House Delegate Nicholas Freitas who today is campaigning to win nomination as the Republican candidate for US Senate in 2018.

This bill was one of 91 bills that are awaiting review at Virginia’s House Privileges and Elections Committee, according to Richmond Sunlight, an amazing transparency organization aggregating information about the government of Virginia. According to the Richmond Sunlight, other laws to come before this powerful committee include redistricting, student voter registration, voter id repeal, and campaign finance transparency.

To understand the basics of how the Virginia system to register as a candidate (if you are not a Democrat or Republican of course) works today, here is some great information compiled by the impressive American politics and elections online encyclopedia Ballotpedia concerning the most up-to-date Virginia Ballot Access laws for independent candidates for the United States House of Representatives or the United States Senate for the 2018:

The candidate “must file a declaration of candidacy, a petition, and a candidate qualification certificate form with the Virginia State Board of Elections. A candidate for statewide office or the Virginia General Assembly must file a declaration of candidacy form, a petition, a statement of economic interests form, and a candidate qualification certificate form. The candidate must file the required forms by 7:00 p.m. on the second Tuesday in June.”

“A candidate for local office must file a declaration of candidacy, a petition, a statement of economic interests form, and a candidate qualification certificate form with the local authority in the county or city in which the office is being sought. The candidate must submit the required forms by 7:00 p.m. on the second Tuesday in June. An independent candidate must gather the same number of petition signatures as partisan candidates. There are no filing fees for independent candidates.”

For some wider understanding of the laws that prevent the success of independent and third party candidates in Virginia, this video below has an interview with the 2016 Libertarian candidate for Governor of Virginia Robert Sarvis. In the video, recorded during the election, Sarvis talks about his hope of not being prevented from participating in the debates with the Democratic and Republican candidates that were scheduled to take place. After the video was made, he learned he would not be allowed to participate. The video gives a good inside view of how many hurdles he faced throughout the campaign.

The video is about ten minutes. Take a look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxda9VacWvQ

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: American Democracy Originals, Democracy in America Tagged With: American State Elections, Third Party

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Adrian Tawfik

Democracy Chronicles has been run by Founder and Editor-in-Chief Adrian Tawfik since 2011. He received a B.A. from New School University and is based in New York City where he built DC from the ground up. See Adrian's Opinion Column for a sampling of Adrian's personal views and browse his hundreds of original political memes. Also take a look at the rest of our international team of authors.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • Federal court issues TRO against DOJ for election-related activities
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 9 hours ago
  • State of Alaska Explains Why DOJ’s New Demand to Segregate Ballots is Nonsensical and Unworkable
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 12 hours ago
  • The Confusion Over the Candidate with the Same Last Name…in Nevada…with a Sneaky Republican-Backed Voter-Confusing (?) Ad Featuring AOC That I’m Sure DOJ Will Investigate (Ha!)
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 12 hours ago
  • In DOJ’s Alaska Lawsuit, a Bait and Switch: Before It Wanted to Delay Certification; Now It Wants to Segregate Ballots, a Remedy That Will Offer No Relevant Evidence About Any Voter Confusion
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 12 hours ago
  • Michael Rosin: “18 U.S.C. § 611 Does NOT Authorize the United States to Order the Sequestration of Mail In Ballots from Alleged Non-Citizens”
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 14 hours ago