• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Democracy Chronicles

Towards better democracy everywhere.

  • AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
  • WORLD DEMOCRACY
  • POLITICAL ART
  • more
    • election technology
    • money politics
    • political dissidents
    • THIRD PARTY
      • third party central
      • green party
      • justice party
      • libertarian party
    • voting methods
  • DC INFO
    • author central
    • about
    • advertise with DC
    • contact
    • privacy policy
You are here: Home / DC Authors / Why America Should Emulate Oregon’s Vote-by-Mail System

Why America Should Emulate Oregon’s Vote-by-Mail System

November 27, 2017 by Hassan Elhage Leave a Comment

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet
Oregon’s Vote-by-Mail System

Elections can be chaotic. Violence during campaigns, corrupt unwillingness by political leaders to transfer power, and long lines. Through it all, America has shown a relatively consistent democratic process, albeit imperfect.

For one, intelligence agencies all say Russia tampered last November’s election. And Donald Trump— the unlikely candidate backed by Russia— is now sitting in the highest office of the land. The result is an undermining faith in American democracy. An enemy went out of its way to select its preferred candidate, and its choice prevailed in one of the most surprising presidential victories of all time.

But activists see even more at fault domestically, with the Electoral College that progressed a less popular candidate. They argue Trump would not have won if it were not for the Electoral College’s dismissal of the popular vote.

Ironically, Trump, as President of the United States, himself distrusts American elections, holding faith in an alternative reality. He believes he is the rightful winner of the popular vote due to the illegitimate votes of millions of undocumented immigrants, hence his executive order for an Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

Either way, Russia and Trump have both created doubt in the minds of Americans as to the integrity of the election process. The impact is on future elections. Soon Americans will once again embrace their weather as they take off from obligations to stand on their feet and cast away their votes. Democracy at its finest, isn’t it?

Forget Trump’s rhetoric, Russia’s ploys, and the electoral college for a second. The biggest threat to democracy is the voting process we currently have in place. The literal way we vote, which can make or break an election, is wrong. Misguided under the guise of tradition. It forces voters to take off work to stand in rain and vote based on who CNN presented more favorably the night before. A more voter-friendly structure looks like this: it allows multiple weeks to vote, thus, maximizing reflection and turnout and minimizing the effectiveness of last-minute sabotages. Oregon is already leading the nation on this path.

To start, the most important part of an election is the vote count, and the integrity of it. It determines the fate of the presidency. And thus, nothing is more essential than a reliable way to count votes. It is for this reason Oregon willingly uses paper votes via mail as an initial record, which reliably ensures the security of a voter’s decision in case a retracing is needed.

But the core benefit of a paper system via mail is voters get an abundance of the most precious and important entity: time. Sometimes problems arise for a voter. Like when personal information has changed and no longer matches registration information. Thus, Oregon’s system affords voters the opportunity to clear up discrepancies by visiting the local elections office during the voting period. There are no poll sites limited to one date, saving voters the hassle of dealing with such problems after waiting hours on line, and ensuring their vote is counted.

Convenience through time alone is the reason Oregon ranks one of the highest in voter turnout. Votes are accumulated over a period, meaning the totals add up.

Better yet, without having one single date for voting, there is less ability for breaking news to rattle the outcome. Thus, Oregon’s system is even more resistant to the natural turn of campaign surprises than France’s method of a media blackout before elections. As an example, the October surprise letter by FBI director James Comey with its infamous timing would be less impactful had America followed the Oregonian way and gave voters the luxury of time to reflect and vote when ready. With the gift of more time, the timing of breaking news is made obsolete.

If we want to uphold our commitment to taking democracy seriously, we should change elections so that each voter is afforded more than one day to think through their big political decisions and complete the act. And no voter should be standing in a long line, counting the number of seconds until the end. Instead, each should hold onto their ballot in the comfort of their own home, delivered and returned at the time that works best. There’s no reason to rush democracy. One day should not decide the next four years.

FacebookLinkedInPinTweet

Filed Under: DC Authors Tagged With: Absentee and Mail Voting, American State Elections, Voter Turnout

Some highlighted Democracy Chronicles topics

Africa American Corruption American Local Elections American State Elections Asia Capitalism and Big Business Celebrity Politics China Democracy Charity Democracy Protests Democrats Dictatorships Education Election History Election Methods Election Security Election Transparency Europe Internet and Democracy Journalism and Free Speech Middle East Minority Voting Rights Money Politics New York City and State Elections Political Artwork Political Dissidents Political Lobbying Redistricting Republicans Russia Socialism and Labor Social Media and Democracy South America Spying and Privacy Supreme Court Third Party Voter Access Voter ID Voter Registration Voter Suppression Voter Turnout Voting Technology Women Voting Rights Worldwide Worldwide Corruption

About Hassan Elhage

Hassan Elhage is an undergraduate student at New York University with a strong interest in human rights, political ideology, and American and international politics. He currently writes for the Democracy Chronicles from New York City. Checkout the rest of our international team of authors as well!

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

democracy chronicles newsletter

democracy around the web

  • The Impoundment Act, Polarization, Bipartisan...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 10 hours ago
  • Journalist Comlan Hugues Sossoukpè forcibly e...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 11 hours ago
  • CPJ, Freedom House urge U.S. gov to maintain...
    Source: Committee to Protect Journalists Published on: 11 hours ago
  • FL Supreme Court Upholds Congressional Distri...
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 14 hours ago
  • UK Plans to Lower Voting Age to 16
    Source: Election Law Blog Published on: 14 hours ago